Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A mechanical chart Lagrangian with positive definite kinetic matrix is hyperregular, with the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian

Statement

Let n≥1, let J⊆R and U⊆Rn be open and nonempty, and let G:J×U→Mn(R), A:J×U→Rn and V:J×U→R be of class C2 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Assume that G(t,q) is symmetric and positive definite for every (t,q):

G(t,q)T=G(t,q),wTG(t,q)w>0for every 0≠w∈Rn.

Define the mechanical chart Lagrangian

L(t,q,v):=12vTG(t,q)v+A(t,q)⋅v−V(t,q),

with the Euclidean inner product of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Then:

  1. L is of class C2 on J×U×Rn, with Lv(t,q,v)=G(t,q)v+A(t,q) and Lvv(t,q,v)=G(t,q); in particular L is regular on the chart;
  2. the Legendre map FL(t,q,v)=(t,q,G(t,q)v+A(t,q)) is a C2 bijection of J×U×Rn onto itself with C2 inverse

v(t,q,p)=G(t,q)−1(p−A(t,q));

hence L is hyperregular in the sense of The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity; 3. the Hamiltonian of the inverse branch is

H(t,q,p)=12(p−A(t,q))TG(t,q)−1(p−A(t,q))+V(t,q),

a C2 function on J×U×Rn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The C2 fields G,A,V with G(t,q) symmetric positive definite, the Lagrangian L displayed above, and the Legendre map FL(t,q,v)=(t,q,Lv(t,q,v)).

[F1]

Partial derivatives of a quadratic form: if G is symmetric, then the gradient of v↦12vTGv is v↦Gv, and the second derivative in v is the constant matrix G; this is the sum and product rule applied to 12∑i,jGijvivj together with Gij=Gji (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes).

[F2]

Finite sums and products of Cr Euclidean maps are Cr, and composites of composable Cr maps are Cr (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). In particular L is C2 because G,A,V are.

[F3]

A symmetric positive definite matrix is invertible: if Gw=0 then wTGw=0, so w=0, and a linear map of Rn with trivial kernel is bijective by Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T (zero kernel gives image dimension n); its linear inverse is two-sided (Invertible matrices and the general linear group GL⁡n(F), Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).

[F4]

Inversion preserves regularity: if the entries of B:J×U→Mn(R) are Cr and det⁡B never vanishes, then the entries of B−1 are Cr (Matrix inversion preserves Ck regularity where the determinant is nonzero). For B=G, invertibility holds by [F3], and det⁡G≠0 because det⁡(G)det⁡(G−1)=det⁡(GG−1)=det⁡(In)=1 for an invertible G with inverse G−1 (For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B), A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit).

Proof

technique · direct; differentiate the quadratic Lagrangian, invert the velocity--momentum relation by positive definiteness, and complete the square
1.1F1F2F3algebra

By [F1] and [F2] the map L is C2, its gradient in the velocity slot is Lv(t,q,v)=G(t,q)v+A(t,q) and the velocity Hessian is Lvv(t,q,v)=G(t,q). Since G(t,q) is positive definite, it is invertible by [F3], so det⁡Lvv(t,q,v)=det⁡G(t,q)≠0; this proves clause 1.

1.2F3algebra

Clause 2, bijectivity: fix (t,q,p)∈J×U×Rn. By [F3] the matrix G(t,q) is invertible, so the equation G(t,q)v+A(t,q)=p has the unique solution v=G(t,q)−1(p−A(t,q)); hence FL is bijective with the displayed inverse.

2.1F4step 1.2algebra

Clause 2, regularity of the inverse: the entries of G are C2 and det⁡G never vanishes, so by [F4] the entries of (t,q)↦G(t,q)−1 are C2; the formula for v is then a finite combination of C2 maps and is C2 (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition). By The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity this makes L hyperregular.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Clause 3: with v=v(t,q,p)=G−1(p−A) one has p−A=Gv, hence p⋅v−L(t,q,v)=(Gv+A)⋅v−12vTGv−A⋅v+V=12vTGv+V=12(p−A)TG−1(p−A)+V, where the last step uses (Gv)⋅v=vTGv=(p−A)TG−1(p−A) and the symmetry of G−1 (the inverse of a symmetric matrix is symmetric). Thus clause 3 holds, and H is C2 by the same closure properties.

Remarks

  • The case of a constant diagonal matrix G=diag⁡(m1,…,mn) with mi>0 and A=0 gives L=12∑imiq˙i2−V(q) and H=12∑ipi2/mi+V(q), the classical kinetic-plus-potential form. The proposition is stated for a configuration- and time-dependent positive definite G, which is what the consuming classical-mechanics items need for moving constraints and rotating frames.

  • The covector field A is a mathematical datum of the chart: it is allowed to depend on (t,q) and enters the momentum as p=Gv+A. It is not an electromagnetic potential and no physical interpretation of A is asserted here; in particular p is not mass×velocity unless G is constant and A=0. The scope of these identifications is recorded in Scope of the Legendre map: regular versus hyperregular, the meaning of the covector datum, and the limits of the branch description.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources