Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second derivative growth under an explicit horizon decay hypothesis

Statement

Fix m>0 and real qe,qm with qe2+qm2=m2, and let ψ be an admissible neutral spherical C3 solution of □gψ=0 on the regular ingoing extremal RN metric. Put ϕ=rψ and let H=∂rϕ(v,m) be its constant spherical horizon charge. If H≠0 and

lim⁡v→+∞ϕ(v,m)=0,

then

lim⁡v→+∞∂r2ϕ(v,m)v=−Hm2.

Thus this transverse second derivative grows linearly in magnitude with rate ∣H∣/m2 under the stated horizon-trace decay hypothesis. Both sides of the limit have unit [ψ] m−2. The hypothesis is conditional: this proposition proves no global decay theorem, and it concerns neither coupled Einstein–Maxwell perturbations nor a nonlinear instability.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m>0, qe2+qm2=m2, ACω, an admissible real spherical C3 solution ψ of □gψ=0, its constant charge H≠0, and lim⁡v→+∞ϕ(v,m)=0.

[F1]

Spherical scalar waves in regular extremal RN coordinates: the background is g=−D dv2+2 dv dr+r2γS2 with D=(1−m/r)2 and fixed Maxwell field Fin=−qer−2dv∧dr+qmωS2. The vector field ξ=∂v generates the null level r=m with zero signed surface gravity. The reduced C3 profile ψ(v,r) lifts to ψ~(v,r,ω)=ψ(v,r), ϕ=rψ, and its wave operator is the trace of the C1 scalar Hessian, equivalently w−1∂a(wgab∂bψ~); it is C1.

[F2]

Exact spherical horizon charge: H(v)=∂rϕ(v,m) is constant on R.

[F3]

The derivative of the metric density and the chart formula for the divergence of a vector field: for a smooth vector field J, ∇aJa=w−1∂a(wJa) with w=∣det⁡(gab)∣. Its coordinate proof uses only first derivatives of J and the product rule, so it extends to C1 vector fields. Here Ja=gab∂bψ~ is C2, since ψ is C3 and g is smooth.

[F4]

Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields: the connection is metric compatible, so ∇cgab=0; its coordinate tensor derivatives have the stated component formula.

[F5]

Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) for any primitive G: every continuous real function on an interval has a primitive; its oriented integral from a base point is such a primitive, and any primitive evaluates the integral by endpoint differences.

[F6]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): for a continuous function on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), some c∈(a,b) satisfies F(b)−F(a)=F′(c)(b−a).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the geometric connection suppliers assume only ACω for the tangent-bundle smooth structure; no full axiom of choice is assumed.

[A2]

The charge H is nonzero and the horizon trace ϕ(v,m) tends to zero as v→+∞. This is an explicit conditional hypothesis, not a consequence of the charge theorem.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3F4A1algebra

In a local sphere chart with angular metric components γAB, the inverse of the ingoing (v,r) metric block is (011D) and the full density is w=r2det⁡(γAB). For Ja=gab∂bψ~, spherical symmetry gives Jv=ψr, Jr=ψv+Dψr, and JA=0. This vector field is C2, so [F3] applies. By [F1], [F4] and metric compatibility, □gψ~=∇aJa. Applying the density formula and cancelling the angular density, which is independent of v,r, yields 0=□gψ~=1r2[∂v(r2ψr)+∂r ⁣(r2(ψv+Dψr))]. Expanding and using equality of the continuous mixed partials gives 2r2ψvr+2rψv+∂r(r2Dψr)=0. With ϕ=rψ, the identities 2r2ψvr+2rψv=2rϕvr and r2Dψr=D(rϕr−ϕ) reduce this to 2ϕvr+Dϕrr+D′ϕr−D′rϕ=0.

1.2givenF5F6A2algebra

Let f(v):=ϕ(v,m), which is continuous and tends to zero by [A2], and define F(v):=∫v0vf(s) ds for any fixed v0∈R. By [F5], F exists and F′=f. Given ε>0, choose S≥v0 so that ∣f(s)∣<ε for every s≥S. For each v>max⁡{S,0}, the mean value theorem [F6] on [S,v] gives a c∈(S,v) with F(v)−F(S)=f(c)(v−S); hence ∣F(v)v∣≤∣F(S)∣v+εv−Sv. Taking v→+∞ gives lim sup⁡∣F(v)/v∣≤ε. Since ε was arbitrary, F(v)/v→0.

2.1step 1.1F2A1algebra

Differentiate the equation in step 1.1 once in r, which is permitted because ϕ is C3. The result is 2ϕvrr+Dϕrrr+2D′ϕrr+(D′′−D′r)ϕr−(D′′r−D′r2)ϕ=0. Direct differentiation gives D(m)=D′(m)=0 and D′′(m)=2/m2. Evaluating at r=m and using [F2] therefore yields the exact horizon transport identity ∂vϕrr(v,m)=−Hm2+ϕ(v,m)m3.

3.1givenF2F5F7step 1.2step 2.1A2algebra∎

Define P(v):=−H(v−v0)/m2+F(v)/m3 and G(v):=ϕrr(v,m). By [F5], F′(v)=ϕ(v,m), so P′(v)=−H/m2+ϕ(v,m)/m3=G′(v) by step 2.1. Both P and G are continuous on [v0,∞) and differentiable on its interior; [F7] makes G−P constant there. Since P(v0)=0, this gives ϕrr(v,m)−ϕrr(v0,m)=−Hm2(v−v0)+F(v)m3. Divide by v and use step 1.2; the fixed terms ϕrr(v0,m)/v and Hv0/(m2v) tend to zero, while F(v)/(m3v)→0. Therefore ϕrr(v,m)/v→−H/m2. Since H≠0, the limit is nonzero and its absolute value is ∣H∣/m2, proving the stated linear growth.

Remarks

The exact transport equation contains the term ϕ(v,m)/m3. The decay hypothesis makes its integrated contribution sublinear, as proved in step 1.2; the equation does not assert that the horizon value vanishes from the wave equation alone. No global decay theorem or generic-data statement is imported.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources