Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Successive Gaussian shell integration composes

Physical scope

Pure mathematics; no physical premises or physical claim.

Statement

Assume AC. Let d≥1, let C1,C2 be real symmetric positive-semidefinite d×d covariance matrices, and let f:Rd→[0,∞] be Borel. With TC the normalized finite Gaussian shell transform, TC2(TC1f)(x)=TC1+C2f(x)(x∈Rd), as an equality in [0,∞]. In particular, for every finite nonnegative Borel potential V, exp⁡[−(VC1)C2(x)]=exp⁡[−VC1+C2(x)]. The Gaussian measures are normalized probabilities, so no determinant/vacuum constant appears; changing to unnormalized Gaussian weights requires carrying their normalization factors. This is an exact finite-regulator semigroup identity. The proposition does not assert any equation for the derivative with respect to t of VC(t)(x) along a parameterized covariance C(t); deriving such an equation would require a specified differentiable covariance path and separate differentiability and integrability hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; finite dimension; the covariance matrices and Borel function in the Statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the finite-dimensional Gaussian laws.

[F1]

Normalized finite Gaussian shell transform: TCf(x)=∫f(x+z) dγC(z), and VC=−log⁡TC(e−V) when V is finite nonnegative Borel.

[F2]

Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: the law γC exists for every positive-semidefinite covariance C, including singular C.

[F3]

For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique: the product of sigma-finite measures is a sigma-finite measure with the rectangle product formula.

[F4]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: integrable complex functions on a sigma-finite product may be integrated in either order.

[F5]

Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law: γC has characteristic function exp⁡(−uTCu/2), and that transform uniquely determines its law, including singular C.

[F6]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product-measurable functions have measurable section integrals and equal iterated integrals.

Proof

technique · product Gaussian law and Tonelli

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the Statement.

1.1A1F2F3F4F5given

On (Rd,γC1)×(Rd,γC2), the sum map (y,z)↦y+z has characteristic function ∫eiu⋅(y+z) d(γC1×γC2)=exp⁡(−uTC1u/2)exp⁡(−uTC2u/2)=exp⁡[−uT(C1+C2)u/2]. The product measure exists by [F3], the integrand is bounded and therefore integrable, and [F4] justifies the iterated integral/product factorization. Since C1+C2 is positive semidefinite, [F2] and [F5] identify the pushforward under addition as γC1+C2. This includes singular and zero covariances.

2.1F1F6step 1.1given

The function (x,y,z)↦f(x+y+z) is nonnegative and Borel. Apply [F6] to integrate first in y and then in z; the resulting iterated integral equals the integral against the product law of (y,z). By step 1.1 its pushforward under addition is γC1+C2. Therefore ∫(∫f(x+z+y) dγC1(y))dγC2(z)=∫f(x+w) dγC1+C2(w), including the value +∞. By [F1] this is exactly TC2(TC1f)(x)=TC1+C2f(x).

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

For finite nonnegative Borel V, [F1] gives exp⁡[−VC1(x)]=TC1(e−V)(x) and the corresponding identity after applying C2. Substituting f=e−V into step 2.1 proves the stated potential-weight identity. Since the normalized Gaussian integrals are expectations under probability laws, no determinant factor occurs. No differentiation or covariance-path limit was used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources