Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite canonical partition is invariant under static electromagnetic gauge changes

Physical scope

Finite one-particle canonical model on a bounded region with static smooth potentials and a fixed action reference; only time-independent gauge changes are covered, with no claim of field dynamics or empirical realization.

Statement

Let Ω⊂R3 be nonempty bounded open with compact closure, m>0, and qp∈R the signed particle charge in coulombs, as defined in Static electromagnetic coupling and typed canonical momentum and distinct from its exact elementary-charge constant e. Let a0>0 be an action reference and β>0 have units J−1. Let A,φ satisfy the smoothness assumptions of Static electromagnetic coupling and typed canonical momentum, with φ bounded. Adopt the canonical preparation Canonical thermal preparation and the single-particle reference convention Classical particle counting and physical observables relative to dx dp/a03. Then Zβ=1a03∫Ω∫R3e−βH(x,p)dp dx=1a03(2πmβ)3/2∫Ωe−βqpφ(x)dx is finite and positive. If χ∈C3 is time-independent and Aχ=A+∇χ, φχ=φ, then the paired canonical coordinate map Tχ(x,p)=(x,p+qp∇χ(x)) satisfies Zβ,χ=Zβ. It carries the canonical probability to the transformed canonical probability and leaves the expectation of every integrable measurable observable of (x,π) unchanged, where π=p−qpA(x). The result is a conditional prediction of the adopted static model, not an experimental observation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The static external-potential model, smooth time-independent gauge function, fixed action reference and canonical preparation.

[A1]

Ω has finite positive volume, φ is bounded, m>0, β>0, and the canonical density is the one adopted in Canonical thermal preparation relative to the stated phase reference (Classical configuration, cotangent phase and reference measures) and single-particle counting scale (Classical particle counting and physical observables).

[A2]
[F1]

The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π proves ∫Re−x2dx=π. Tonelli gives ∫R3e−∣x∣2d3x=π3/2. For a=β/(2m)>0, the linear map u↦a u has Jacobian a3/2, so the local scaling calculation gives ∫R3e−β∣u∣2/(2m)d3u=a−3/2π3/2=(2πm/β)3/2.

[F2]

Tonelli permits the nonnegative position-momentum integration (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

The nonnegative change-of-variables theorem applies to a C1 diffeomorphism with its absolute Jacobian under Countable Choice (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F4]

Proof

Given: [A1]–[A2] and the Gaussian, product-integration, unit and change-of-variables interfaces [F1]–[F4].

1.1A1A2F1F2F4algebra

Put u=p−qpA(x) in the inner integral. Translation preserves Lebesgue measure and H=∣u∣2/(2m)+qpφ(x). By [F1]–[F2], the displayed formula for Zβ follows. Since e−βqpφ is bounded above and below by positive constants on finite positive-volume Ω, the normalizer is finite and strictly positive.

2.1A2F3step 1.1algebra∎

The map Tχ has inverse T−χ and derivative DTχ=(I0qpD2χI),det⁡DTχ=1. By the paired gauge transformation, Hχ(Tχ(x,p))=∣p+qp∇χ−qp(A+∇χ)∣2/(2m)+qpφ=H(x,p). Apply [F3] to the nonnegative integrand and this diffeomorphism; its unit Jacobian gives Zβ,χ=Zβ. The same substitution carries normalized densities into one another. Moreover (p+qp∇χ)−qp(A+∇χ)=p−qpA=π, so any integrable function of (x,π) has identical expectations in the paired states.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources