Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conducting-medium propagation: the exact attenuation constant, the skin depth and its good- and poor-conductor regimes

Physical scope

Exact conditional statement about a monochromatic plane-wave field in a homogeneous isotropic Ohmic medium at rest with constant scalar eps,mu>0 and sigma>0: the exact complex propagation constant and decay, the closed-form skin depth, explicit bounded remainder inequalities in the good-conductor regime epsomega/sigma<=1/4 and the poor-conductor regime sigma/(epsomega)<=1/2, and the phase relation. Excluded: sigma=0 (no attenuation, infinite skin depth), the ideal-conductor limit, frequency-dependent or tensor conductivity, anisotropy, dispersion, nonlinearity, any laboratory material and all empirical claims.

Statement

Assume the elementary inertial-rest branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch in the isotropic scalar case at rest in the laboratory frame with constants ε,μ>0 and σ>0, the fields of The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields on the laboratory region of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields and the plane-wave structure of Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch: let ω>0, e∈C3∖{0}, n∈R3 a unit vector and k=λn, λ∈C, and let E(x,t)=Re⁡(e ei(k⋅x−ωt)) be a plane-wave field satisfying the amplitude conditions of Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch(b) with k⋅e=0. Put a:=μεω2>0, b:=μσω>0, r:=a2+b2 and let p,q>0 be the quantities of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth. Then:

(a) [Exact propagation constant and decay] λ2=k⋅k=εμω2+iμσω=a+ib, so λ=±(p+iq); if x3′:=n⋅x, then for λ=p+iq E(x,t)=e−qx3′ Re⁡(e ei(px3′−ωt)), so the field oscillates with wavenumber p and its amplitude decays in the direction of increasing x3′ at the exact rate q; with λ=−(p+iq) the exact formula is E(x,t)=eqx3′Re⁡(e ei(−px3′−ωt)), which grows in that direction, so the decaying branch is the one with λ=p+iq, in agreement with the selection rule of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth(b).

(b) [Exact skin depth] q2=(a2+b2−a)/2, p2=(a2+b2+a)/2, pq=b/2=μσω/2, and the skin depth of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth equals the exact closed expression δ(ω)=1q=2 (r+a)b=2(a2+b2+a)μσω.

(c) [Good-conductor regime] put t:=a/b=εω/σ>0. For every t≤1/4 the exact value satisfies the explicit bounds ∣q−b/2∣≤2tb/2=2εωσμσω2,∣δ−2/b∣≤4t2/b=4εωσ2μσω; equivalently δ=2/(μσω) (1+O(εω/σ)) in the declared regime εω/σ≤1/4, with the displayed explicit remainder bounds.

(d) [Poor-conductor regime] put t′:=b/a=σ/(εω)>0. For every t′≤1/2 the exact value satisfies ∣q−σ2με∣≤t′24⋅σ2με,∣δ−2σεμ∣≤t′22⋅2σεμ, so in this regime δ is frequency-independent up to the displayed relative error O((σ/(εω))2).

(e) [Phase relation for a real amplitude] if e∈R3 and λ=p+iq, then E(x,t)=e−qx3′ecos⁡(px3′−ωt),H(x,t)=e−qx3′μω(pcos⁡(px3′−ωt)−qsin⁡(px3′−ωt)) (n×e), and the ratio of the quadrature to the in-phase coefficient is q/p=1+t2−t with 1−2t≤q/p≤1 for every t≤1/2; in particular q/p→1 as t↓0, so the magnetic scalar factor is p2+q2cos⁡(px3′−ωt+η) with η:=arctan⁡(q/p)→π/4 (45 degrees), not a 90-degree quadrature phase shift. At fixed position with the e−iωt convention this corresponds to the stated signed +η phase in the decreasing phase variable.

(f) [Limits and scope] for σ=0 one has b=0, q=0, no attenuation and δ=+∞, and the approximations of (c) and (d) are not applicable; the ideal-conductor limit σ→∞ is not covered by this theorem, which works inside the finite-Ohmic branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch (a separate boundary model is needed for an ideal conductor); the frequency dependence of σ (Drude or other) is not supplied, and σ is the declared constant of the branch; the conclusions are exact identities for the ideal plane-wave field and carry no empirical content, no measured conductivity and no claim about any laboratory field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The declared Ohmic branch with constants ε,μ>0, σ>0; the unit vector n, k=λn, e≠0 with k⋅e=0; the plane-wave field E=Re⁡(e ei(k⋅x−ωt)) with H determined by the amplitude conditions; the numbers a=μεω2>0, b=μσω>0, r=a2+b2 and the parameters p,q>0 of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth.

[F1]

Concrete propagation data: k⋅k=εμω2+iμσω and h=k×e/(ωμ) by Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch(b)-(c); and by Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth(b), κ=p+iq is the unique complex number with Re⁡κ≥0, Im⁡κ≥0 and κ2=a+ib, where p=(r+a)/2 and q=(r−a)/2; also v=(εμ)−1/2 and Z=(μ/ε)1/2.

[F2]

The complex exponential in Cartesian form: for real x,y, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y) and ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

[F3]

Complex arithmetic and modulus: C is a field, a product vanishes only if a factor does, and from z2=w and κ2=w one gets (z−κ)(z+κ)=0, hence z=±κ (The complex numbers as R[x]/(x2+1), with the real embedding and imaginary unit i, C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)); the modulus satisfies zz‾=∣z∣2 and ∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣ (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[F4]

Real roots and order: every nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root, and ab=ab for a,b≥0 follows from squaring and uniqueness (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}); for 0≤a≤b one has a2≤b2, and for 0≤a,b with a2≤b2 one has a≤b (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives); if 0≤a≤b and 0≤c≤d then ac≤bd, and if 0<c<d then 1/d<1/c in the sense 0<1/d≤1/c (Multiplying inequalities of positives, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication: multiplication by a positive preserves order, and 1/c−1/d=(d−c)/(cd)>0).

[F6]

The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2) is continuous and strictly increasing with tan⁡(arctan⁡y)=y (The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2)), and the addition formulas cos⁡(θ+η)=cos⁡θcos⁡η−sin⁡θsin⁡η hold for real angles (The addition formulas for sine and cosine).

[F7]

Trigonometry: sin⁡2θ+cos⁡2θ=1 and cos⁡(−θ)=cos⁡θ (Pythagorean and parity identities for all six trigonometric functions on their natural domains); tan⁡θ=sin⁡θ/cos⁡θ where defined (Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains); sin⁡(θ+π/2)=cos⁡θ and cos⁡(π/2)=0 (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi). Cosine is strictly decreasing on [0,π] and hence positive on (0,π/2) (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine). Consequently sin⁡(π/4)=cos⁡(−π/4)=cos⁡(π/4)>0, so tan⁡(π/4)=1 and arctan⁡1=π/4 by [F6].

Proof

technique · direct; substitute the concrete data into the medium plane-wave theorem, extract the decaying root via Euler's Cartesian form, and bound the exact radicals with elementary square-root inequalities
1.1givenF1F2F3F5algebra

[Propagation constant and decay, part (a)] By [F1], k⋅k=εμω2+iμσω=a+ib, and since k=λn with n⋅n=1 the bilinear expansion gives λ2=k⋅k=a+ib; by [F1] and [F5] with [F3], the solutions of z2=a+ib are exactly z=±(p+iq). Writing x3′=n⋅x, so that k⋅x=λx3′, the exponent is i(k⋅x−ωt)=iλx3′−iωt; for λ=p+iq this is −qx3′+i(px3′−ωt), and the Cartesian form [F2] gives ei(k⋅x−ωt)=e−qx3′(cos⁡(px3′−ωt)+isin⁡(px3′−ωt)), whence E=e−qx3′Re⁡(e ei(px3′−ωt)) componentwise; the amplitude factor e−qx3′ decreases as x3′ increases because q>0 by [F1]. For λ=−(p+iq) the same computation gives iλx3′−iωt=qx3′+i(−px3′−ωt) and E=eqx3′Re⁡(e ei(−px3′−ωt)), which grows in the direction of increasing x3′; the decaying branch is therefore λ=p+iq, matching the root selection of [F1].

2.1step 1.1F1F4algebra

[Exact skin depth, part (b)] By [F1], q2=(r−a)/2 and p2=(r+a)/2 with r=a2+b2; multiplying, (pq)2=(r2−a2)/4=b2/4, and since p,q≥0 and b>0 the uniqueness of the nonnegative square root in [F4] gives pq=b/2=μσω/2. For the skin depth δ=1/q of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth(c): δ2=1/q2=2/(r−a)=2(r+a)/((r−a)(r+a))=2(r+a)/b2, where (r−a)(r+a)=r2−a2=b2 by [F4]; since δ>0 and b>0, taking the nonnegative square root gives δ=2(r+a)/b, and substituting a=μεω2 and b=μσω gives the displayed closed form.

3.1step 2.1F1F4algebra

[Ratio identities] With t=a/b>0 one has r=b1+t2 because r2=a2+b2=b2(t2+1) and both sides are nonnegative, by [F4]; hence q2=(r−a)/2=b2(1+t2−t) and 1+t2−t=(1+t2+t)−1, the second identity because (1+t2−t)(1+t2+t)=1+t2−t2=1 with all factors positive by [F4] and [F1]. Moreover q/p=1+t2−t: indeed q2/p2=(r−a)/(r+a), and the same rationalisation gives (r−a)/(r+a)=(1+t2−t)2, so the positive quantities q/p and 1+t2−t have equal squares and are equal by [F4]. With s=t′=b/a>0 one has analogously r=a1+s2 and q2=a2(1+s2−1). Writing qt:=σ2με, the identity qt=a s2 holds: expanding a=ω(εμ)1/2 and s=σεω by [F1] gives a s2=ω(εμ)1/2σ2εω=σ2με; hence q2/qt2=2(1+s2−1)s2=21+1+s2 by the same rationalisation.

4.1step 3.1F1F4algebra

[Good-conductor bounds, part (c)] For t≥0 one has 1≤1+t2≤1+t: the left inequality because 1≤1+t2 and both sides are nonnegative, the right because 1+t2≤(1+t)2=1+2t+t2, both by [F4]. Hence 11+2t≤1+t2−t≤11+t≤1 by step 3.1 and [F4], and 11+2t≥1−2t because 0≤1−2t≤1 and (1−2t)(1+2t)=1−4t2≤1 for t≤1/2; therefore 1−2t≤qb/2≤1, that is b/21−2t≤q≤b/2. For t≤1/4 one has 1−2t≥0 and (1−2t)2≤1−2t, so 1−2t≥1−2t by [F4], giving ∣q−b/2∣≤2tb/2 with the stated equivalent form since b/2=μσω/2. For δ=1/q one has 2/b≤δ≤2/b1−2t from the bound on q and [F4]; and 11−2t≤1+4t for t≤1/4 because 1≤(1+4t)(1−2t)=1+2t−8t2, i.e. 0≤2t(1−4t), by [F4]; hence ∣δ−2/b∣≤4t2/b with the stated equivalent form.

4.2step 3.1F4algebra

[Poor-conductor bounds, part (d)] By step 3.1, q2=a2(1+s2−1) and q2/qt2=21+1+s2 with qt=σ2με, s=t′=b/a>0. Since 1+s2≥1, the ratio is at most 1, so q≤qt; and 1+s2≤1+s22 because 1+s2≤(1+s22)2=1+s2+s44, so q2/qt2≥22+s22=11+s24; for s2≤1 (which holds when s≤1/2) one has 11+s2/4≥1−s24 since (1−s24)(1+s24)=1−s416≤1 with 1−s24≥0; therefore q/qt≥1−s24, i.e. ∣q−qt∣≤s24qt. For δ=1/q and δt=1/qt we get δ/δt=qt/q≤11−s2/4≤1+s22 whenever s2≤1 (since 11−s2/4≤1+s22 is equivalent to 1≤1+s24−s48, true for s2≤2), whence ∣δ−δt∣≤s22δt; substituting δt=2σεμ gives both displayed bounds, by [F4] throughout.

5.1givenstep 1.1step 3.1step 4.1F1F2F4F6F7algebra

[Phase relation, part (e)] Assume e∈R3 and λ=p+iq; by [F1], h=k×e/(ωμ)=λ (n×e)/(ωμ) because k=λn and n×e is real, and the exponent is computed as in step 1.1. Writing θ:=px3′−ωt and using λ/(μω)=(p+iq)/(μω) with real p,q, the Cartesian form [F2] gives Re⁡((p+iq)(cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ))=pcos⁡θ−qsin⁡θ, so E=e−qx3′ecos⁡θ and H=e−qx3′(pcos⁡θ−qsin⁡θ)(n×e)/(μω), the two displayed identities. By step 3.1, q/p=1+t2−t, and the bounds 1−2t≤q/p≤1 for t≤1/2 are the ones established in step 4.1 for the same quantity; as t↓0 the inequality 0≤1+t2−1=t2/(1+t2+1)≤t2/2 gives ∣1+t2−t−1∣≤t+t2/2→0, so η:=arctan⁡(q/p) tends to arctan⁡1=π/4 by the continuity of arctan⁡ in [F6]. Put r:=q/p>0 and η=arctan⁡r∈(0,π/2); by [F6], sin⁡η=rcos⁡η, and the Pythagorean identity sin⁡2η+cos⁡2η=1 with cos⁡η>0 gives cos⁡η=1/1+r2 and sin⁡η=r/1+r2; equivalently cos⁡η=p/p2+q2 and sin⁡η=q/p2+q2, since 1+r2=p2+q2/p with p>0 by [F4]. The addition formula of [F6] then gives p2+q2cos⁡(θ+η)=pcos⁡θ−qsin⁡θ, which is the stated form of the magnetic scalar factor.

6.1givenstep 4.2F1F8∎

[Limits and scope, part (f)] Clause (f): for σ=0 the definition of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth gives b=0, q=0, no attenuation and δ=+∞, and the divisions and bounds of steps 3.1-4.2 use b>0, q>0 and are not evaluated at zero; the limit σ→∞ is outside the finite-Ohmic branch and the frequency dependence of σ is not supplied; all identities are exact for the plane-wave field and involve no measurement, material data or empirical statement, and no choice principle is used since every quantity is defined by explicit formulas in the given scalars.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources