Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Creeping continuum pressure and bounded observations

Physical scope

Conditional pressure-observation stability for the separately adopted steady forced creeping Stokes branch on a bounded no-slip domain. The material- acceleration term is omitted by that model assumption; no finite-Re Navier–Stokes approximation error, empirical coefficient inference, or experimental validation is asserted.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let D∗⊂R3 be a nonempty bounded connected Lipschitz open set whose boundary has a finite rigidly moved graph-chart atlas, contained in a slab (a,b)×R2, and set CP(D∗):=b−a. Let ℓ0>0 metres and U0>0 metres per second be reference length and velocity; the physical domain is Ωphys=ℓ0D∗. Fix constant density ρ0>0 kilograms per cubic metre and constant dynamic viscosity μ0>0 pascal seconds. Write ν∗:=μ0/(ρ0U0ℓ0)>0 for the dimensionless kinematic viscosity and νphys:=μ0/ρ0 for its dimensional value in square metres per second. For each continuous body-acceleration field bi∈C0(Ωphys;R3)∩L2(Ωphys;R3) in metres per second squared, set gi∗(y):=ℓ0bi(ℓ0y)/U02. Use the forced creeping Stokes branch defined on this page: the velocity ui∗∈V:=H01(D∗;R3) with gradient norm ∥v∥V=∥∇v∥L2(D∗) has zero trace on the selected stationary no-slip wall, the pressure qi∗∈Q:=L02(D∗)={q∈L2(D∗):∫D∗q dy=0} is the spatial mean-zero multiplier, and the weak model equation is

2ν∗∫D∗ε(ui∗):ε(v) dy−∫D∗qi∗div⁡v dy=Fi(v)(v∈V),−∫D∗rdiv⁡ui∗ dy=0(r∈Q),

where ε(w)=(∇w+∇wT)/2 and Fi(v):=∫D∗gi∗(y)⋅v(y) dy. The physical pressure is recovered from pi,phys(ℓ0y)=ρ0U02qi∗(y) using this mean-zero gauge. Let m≥1 be an integer and let S1,…,Sm:Q→R be bounded real-linear pressure sensors with ∥Sj∥Q′:=sup⁡∥q∥L2(D∗)≤1∣Sj(q)∣. Define the physical pressure-output vector Pphys(bi):=ρ0U02(S1(qi∗),…,Sm(qi∗))∈Rm. The earlier Stokes-load solvability and sensor-stability theorem gives the weak solution pairs and yields

∥Pphys(b1)−Pphys(b2)∥Rm≤3ρ0U02Cdiv(D∗)CP(D∗)(∑j=1m∥Sj∥Q′2)1/2∥g1∗−g2∗∥L2(D∗),

where Cdiv(D∗)<∞ satisfies: there is a bounded linear right inverse BD∗:Q→V with div⁡BD∗q=q and ∥∇BD∗q∥L2(D∗)≤Cdiv(D∗)∥q∥Q. This is a conditional stability result for the adopted forced creeping model. It does not infer that inertia is negligible from Re⁡, estimate the error against the full Navier–Stokes model at finite Reynolds number, fix an absolute pressure gauge, or report an experiment.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Countable Choice is the statement that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The weak Stokes solvability supplier uses exactly this choice strength. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[L1]

The current creeping-force postulate adopts the steady alternative force law div⁡u=0 and div⁡σ+ρ0b=0 for a specified body-acceleration field, with no material-acceleration momentum equation imposed on the same field. This is the conditional physical interface used below. Alternative restricted creeping-flow force balance

[A2]

The selected boundary branch is stationary no-slip, hence velocity trace zero; this is adopted boundary data, not a consequence of an interior balance. Specified wall, thermal, periodic and initial data

[F3]

The forced creeping branch definition fixes ν∗, the mean-zero pressure gauge, V=H01(D∗;R3), Q=L02(D∗), and the weak Stokes form with Fi(v)=∫gi∗⋅v. Its body-force right-hand side uses the current adopted steady alternative force-balance interface [L1]. Forced creeping Stokes branch for pressure observations

[F1]

The bounded Stokes sensor theorem assumes Countable Choice, D∗ bounded connected Lipschitz, ν∗>0, V=H01(D∗;R3) with gradient norm, Q=L02(D∗) with its L2 norm, and a continuous load in V′. It supplies a unique weak pair and the finite-sensor bound with constant 3Cdiv(D∗). Lipschitz stability of bounded Stokes pressure observations

[F2]

The Poincare supplier gives ∥v∥L2(D∗)≤CP(D∗)∥v∥V for zero-trace fields, with CP(D∗)=b−a for the chosen bounding slab. A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields

Proof

Given: Countable Choice; the dimensionless domain and scales; the two body-acceleration inputs; the forced creeping model interface; and the finite family of bounded pressure sensors.

1.1givenF2F3algebra

For each i∈{1,2} and v∈V, the local forced-branch definition gives Fi(v)=∫D∗gi∗⋅v [F3]. Cauchy–Schwarz and [F2] give ∣Fi(v)∣≤∥gi∗∥L2(D∗)∥v∥L2(D∗)≤CP(D∗)∥gi∗∥L2(D∗)∥v∥V. Thus Fi∈V′ and ∥F1−F2∥V′≤CP(D∗)∥g1∗−g2∗∥L2(D∗).

2.1A1A2F1F3L1givenstep 1.1

By step 1.1, F1,F2∈V′. Apply [F1] to these loads and the sensors S1,…,Sm. Its weak Stokes solutions are the pairs specified by [F3], so ∥(Sj(q1∗)−Sj(q2∗))j=1m∥Rm≤3Cdiv(D∗)(∑j=1m∥Sj∥Q′2)1/2∥F1−F2∥V′. Under the adopted physical assumption [L1], together with the Newtonian closure in [F3] and selected boundary data [A2], this weak system is the forced creeping model and contains no inertial term. The omission of material acceleration is the stated branch choice, not a consequence of small Reynolds number.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

By the definition of the physical outputs, their difference is the dimensionless sensor vector in step 2.1 multiplied by the positive pressure scale ρ0U02. Substitute the load bound from step 1.1 and the sensor estimate from step 2.1, then multiply by this scale to obtain the claimed inequality. The right side has pressure units, and the result is conditional on the adopted creeping balance, not an approximation estimate for full Navier–Stokes flow.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources