Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reduction of the field equations of the homogeneous cosmological model to the Friedmann and acceleration equations, with derived continuity

Physical scope

Conditional reduction of the adopted field law for the homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model: the field equations hold exactly when the Friedmann and acceleration equations hold for the model data, and then the continuity equation holds as a consequence of the field law. The result is conditional on the adopted geometry, matter content and field law; it asserts no measured value, no existence of solutions for arbitrary equations of state and no claim that the model describes nature.

Statement

Adopt the homogeneous cosmological model of Adopted homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model with a comoving perfect fluid with an FLRW model datum (I,Σ,γ,k,a), conversion constant c>0, a vacuum or comoving perfect-fluid matter sector, and the field law of Adopted Einstein field equation in the direct-equation presentation with the same c, the parameter Λ∈R and the framework's GN>0 (SI unit and coordinate conventions of the classical gravitational framework, Adopted spacetime model and classical domain of the gravitational framework). Write g for the FLRW metric, Gab for its Einstein tensor, Tab for the model's stress-energy tensor and, in the matter sector, let ε(t),p(t) be the homogeneous density and pressure and n=c−1∂t the comoving congruence. Then:

(a) On the spacetime, the field equation Gab+Λgab=8πGNc4Tab holds if and only if the Friedmann equation (F) and the acceleration equation (A) of The Friedmann, acceleration and continuity equations of an FLRW model datum hold for the data (c,GN,Λ,I,k,a,ε,p). Here the vacuum sector is the case ε=p=0, in which Tab=0.

(b) If the field equation holds, then the continuity equation (C) of The Friedmann, acceleration and continuity equations of an FLRW model datum holds; in the vacuum sector it holds trivially.

No converse of (b) is asserted: the continuity equation is not claimed to suffice for the field equation, and no existence or uniqueness of solutions of the reduced system is asserted for any data or equation of state.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The adopted homogeneous cosmological model with FLRW datum (I,Σ,γ,k,a), its metric g, comoving congruence n=c−1∂t, the field law with parameters c,GN,Λ, and the vacuum or comoving perfect-fluid matter sector with homogeneous ε(t),p(t).

[L1]

The model's spacetime is a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, n is the comoving congruence, and in a product chart (x0,x1,x2,x3) with x0=t the metric has components g00=−c2, g0i=0, gij=a(t)2γij; the physical four-velocity of the comoving observers is U=cn (Adopted homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model with a comoving perfect fluid clause (i), The FLRW metric is smooth Lorentzian; the comoving field is unit timelike and cosmic time parametrizes comoving curves by proper time; the slices carry the scaled spatial metric, FLRW model data: warped product metric, cosmic time, comoving congruence, scale factor and Hubble parameter).

[L2]

In the perfect-fluid sector the stress-energy tensor of the model is Tab=(ε+p)nanb+pgab with n the fluid's unit four-velocity, which by clause (ii) of the postulate is the comoving congruence; in the vacuum sector T=0 (The perfect-fluid matter model: rest energy density, pressure, four-velocity and stress-energy, Stress-energy tensor field of a model).

[L3]

The Einstein tensor of g has, in the product chart, the components G00=3(a˙2+kc2)/a2, G0i=0 and Gij=−((2aa¨+a˙2)/c2+k)γij (Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors of the FLRW metric in product charts clause (c)). In the same chart g00=−c2, g0i=0, gij=a2γij and γij is the nonzero symmetric matrix of the spatial metric [L1].

[L4]

In the comoving congruence the expansion is ϑ=∇ana=3H/c, the comoving congruence is geodesic with vanishing acceleration ab=na∇anb=0, and homogeneity gives ∂ip=0 (The comoving congruence is geodesic; its expansion is three Hubble parameters per unit conversion constant, Adopted homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model with a comoving perfect fluid clause (ii)).

[L5]

For the perfect-fluid model, ∇aTab=0 holds on the matter domain if and only if the fluid equations Dε+(ε+p)ϑ=0 and (ε+p)ab+hba∂ap=0 hold, with Df=na∂af and hab=gab+nanb (Divergence-free dust is exactly the dust system, and divergence-free perfect fluid is exactly the fluid equations, The perfect-fluid matter model: rest energy density, pressure, four-velocity and stress-energy).

[L6]

The field law of Adopted Einstein field equation in the direct-equation presentation is Gab+Λgab=8πGNc4Tab on the matter domain, and every solution satisfies ∇aTab=0, a consequence of the equation and the contracted second Bianchi identity (Adopted Einstein field equation in the direct-equation presentation, Consistency conditions of the adopted field law: conservation, trace, parameter variation and the energy conditions of a perfect fluid clause (a)). The equations (F), (A), (C) and (S) are those of The Friedmann, acceleration and continuity equations of an FLRW model datum, and (F) with (S) is equivalent to (F) with (A) (Equivalence of the Friedmann and acceleration systems, and the derivation of acceleration from Friedmann and continuity where the Hubble parameter does not vanish clause (a)).

Proof

technique · compute the two sides of the field equation component by component in a product chart, then read off the reduced equations and the conservation consequence
1.1L1L2algebra

(Stress-energy components.) In the product chart, and in the perfect-fluid sector, [L2] gives Tab=(ε+p)nanb+pgab with na=gabnb; by [L1], n0=g00n0=−c2⋅c−1=−c and ni=0, so T00=(ε+p)c2−pc2=εc2, T0i=0, and Tij=0+p a2γij=pa2γij. In the vacuum sector ε=p=0 gives the same displays with T=0.

2.1L3step 1.1algebra

(The 00 component.) By [L3] and step 1.1, the 00 component of the field equation reads 3(a˙2+kc2)/a2−Λc2=8πGNc4εc2=8πGNc2ε; dividing by 3 and rearranging gives H2+kc2/a2=8πGN3c2ε+Λc23, which is (F). The rearrangement is reversible, so the 00 component holds exactly when (F) holds.

2.2L3step 1.1algebra

(The ij components and the mixed components.) By [L3] and step 1.1, the ij component reads −(2aa¨+a˙2c2+k)γij+Λa2γij=8πGNc4pa2γij; since at each point the matrix γij has nonzero diagonal entries and is symmetric, this system of nine component equations holds exactly when the single scalar equation (S) of The Friedmann, acceleration and continuity equations of an FLRW model datum holds. The mixed components hold identically: G0i=0 by [L3] and T0i=0 by step 1.1, so both sides vanish.

3.1L6step 2.1step 2.2algebra

(Part (a).) Combining steps 2.1 and 2.2, the field equation holds exactly when (F) and (S) both hold; by [L6] and Equivalence of the Friedmann and acceleration systems, and the derivation of acceleration from Friedmann and continuity where the Hubble parameter does not vanish clause (a), the pair (F) and (S) is equivalent to the pair (F) and (A). Hence the field equation holds exactly when (F) and (A) hold, which is claim (a), including the vacuum case treated throughout with ε=p=0.

4.1L6step 3.1algebra∎

(Part (b), without division by H.) Assume the field equation holds, so (F) and (A) hold by step 3.1. The smooth data allow the derivative calculation of Equivalence of the Friedmann and acceleration systems, and the derivation of acceleration from Friedmann and continuity where the Hubble parameter does not vanish [L2]-[L3] and proof step 2.1: H˙=a¨/a−H2 and differentiation of (F) gives 2H(H˙−kc2/a2)=(8πGN/(3c2))ε˙. Subtracting (F) from (A) gives H˙−kc2/a2=a¨/a−(H2+kc2/a2)=−4πGN(ε+p)/c2. Substituting this into the differentiated (F) and multiplying by 3c2/(8πGN) yields ε˙=−3H(ε+p), which is (C) throughout I, including every point where H=0. Only the positive constant GN and c are divided by, so static or turning points are retained. In vacuum ε=p=0 the same equation is immediate. The conservation identity in [L6] also yields (C) through the fluid equations [L4]-[L5]. This proves (b).

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources