How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nondegenerate stationary perturbation of a simple gapped label: first- and second-order coefficients and an explicit cubic remainder
The stationary perturbation statement for the declared perturbed-family model with a simple isolated label: self-adjointness of the family for real couplings, existence, uniqueness and reality of the followed label inside the gap contour, the exact first- and second-order energy coefficients with the reduced inverse of the complementary spectral subspace, and the explicit cubic remainder bound on the coupling disk. The theorem concerns spectral data of the declared operator family only; it asserts no ramping protocol, no branch population, no relaxation, no transition rate and no measurement.
Statement
Adopt the framework data and the declared perturbed-family model of The declared perturbed-family model: bounded self-adjoint perturbation, isolated gapped label and followed spectral cluster in the simple-label case: is self-adjoint on , with , on for real , and is an isolated eigenvalue of of multiplicity one with gap at least , . Let be a normalized eigenvector, , let be the reduced inverse of the model clause (c)(iii). In the branch put Then clauses (a)-(e) hold for every real with in this positive-norm branch; clause (f) covers independently of :
(a) is self-adjoint on ; the model's followed label of the contour exists, is the unique spectral value of inside that contour, is real, and its spectral projection is the orthogonal rank-one projection ;
(b) the gauge-fixed eigenvector is analytic in , satisfies and , and
(c) the model's label identity holds, so the deviation of the model's energy label is controlled by the perturbation alone;
(d) the exact coefficients are with , and ; the second-order coefficient involves the whole complementary spectral subspace of through , continuum included;
(e) the cubic remainder obeys so at the bound is and for it is at most ;
(f) if , that is , then , and for every real , and no radius involving division by is used in this branch;
(g) the theorem is conditional on the strict positive gap, on the multiplicity one of and on the boundedness of ; it asserts no unbounded or degenerate perturbation theorem, no time-dependent perturbation, and no statement about which branch of the family a preparation occupies.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the declared perturbed-family model in the simple-label case; and the reduced inverse as in the statement; a real with ; the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Self-adjointness of bounded perturbations. For a self-adjoint and a symmetric with and -bound less than one, on is self-adjoint (Kato-Rellich theorem).
Contour construction and reality. Under the hypotheses of the contour theorem ( self-adjoint on its exact dense domain, isolated with gap at least and rank-one spectral projection , bounded with , ): is closed and densely defined on with norm-convergent resolvent series on the contour ; the operator is an operator-norm holomorphic rank-one Riesz projection, there is exactly one spectral value of inside , of algebraic multiplicity one with , and for real the operator is self-adjoint and is its orthogonal spectral projection (Contour perturbation projection clauses (a)-(d)).
Coefficients and remainder. Under the hypotheses of [F2] with the reduced inverse of Simple-level reduced-resolvent coefficients and the gauge-fixed : on the complex disk , , , , the identity holds, the coefficients and bounds of clause (d) hold, and the cubic remainder bound of clause (e) holds; for one has , , (Analytic perturbation remainder clauses (a)-(c)).
Model data. The model's clause (c) supplies and exactly as the followed perturbed label and Riesz/spectral projection of the contour theorem, the multiplicity-one hypothesis, the gap at least , the reduced inverse and the reading of as the model's sharp energy observable (The declared perturbed-family model: bounded self-adjoint perturbation, isolated gapped label and followed spectral cluster).
Proof
Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F4].
[Self-adjointness on ] The perturbation is bounded and symmetric with , and the -bound of is because ; hence [F1] gives that on is self-adjoint for every real . This is the self-adjointness assertion of (a).
[Contour, label and projection] In the simple-label case the projection has rank one and the gap hypothesis is , so [F2] applies for every real with ; since gives , the conclusions hold: there is exactly one spectral value of inside , it has algebraic multiplicity one with range , is holomorphic and rank one, and for real the projection is the orthogonal spectral projection at the real value . By [F4] these are exactly the model's followed label and its projection, so clause (a) is proved.
[Gauge-fixed eigenvector, coefficients and remainder] With the identified objects, [F3] applies on the disk : is analytic with the displayed normalization and eigenvector equation, the quantitative bounds , , hold, the label identity of clause (c) holds, and the coefficients, the bounds , , and the cubic remainder bound hold. By [F4] the operator is the model's complementary reduced inverse, so the second-order term involves the whole complementary spectral subspace, continuum included. This proves clauses (b), (c), (d) and (e).
[The branch] If then and the family is constant, ; [F3] clause (c) gives , , for every real without using a radius (no division by occurs). This is clause (f).
[Scope] Every hypothesis used above is one of: the model's bounded self-adjoint perturbation and simple gapped label, the strict positive gap , multiplicity one, and the choice assumption of the spectral suppliers. No unbounded perturbation, degenerate label, time-dependent coupling, ramping protocol, transition rate, branch population or measurement entered the argument; the objects , , are spectral data of the declared family, which is clause (g).
Remarks
- Where the continuum enters. The reduced inverse acts on the whole complementary subspace , so the second-order coefficient automatically includes the contribution of the continuous spectrum of ; the theorem needs no discrete-eigenbasis expansion and no sum over bound states.
- Determinant of the remainder. The bound is a genuine cubic bound on the disk of radius ; no uniformity in beyond that disk is claimed, and the gap enters both the radius and the constant.
Depends on
The declared perturbed-family model: bounded self-adjoint perturbation, isolated gapped label and followed spectral cluster
State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems
Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes
Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution
Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework
Kato-Rellich theorem
Contour perturbation projection
Simple-level reduced-resolvent coefficients
Analytic perturbation remainder
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Section 9.1 printed pages 203-205 (PDF pages 211-213): the perturbative expansions (9.2)-(9.11), the first-order shift E_b = <E0|Delta|E0> (9.6) and the second-order shift (9.11), derived under the non-degeneracy assumption
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 6.6 printed pages 153-159 (PDF pages 165-171): strong and norm resolvent convergence and the analytic perturbation consequences for bounded perturbations