Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nondegenerate stationary perturbation of a simple gapped label: first- and second-order coefficients and an explicit cubic remainder

Physical scope

The stationary perturbation statement for the declared perturbed-family model with a simple isolated label: self-adjointness of the family for real couplings, existence, uniqueness and reality of the followed label inside the gap contour, the exact first- and second-order energy coefficients with the reduced inverse of the complementary spectral subspace, and the explicit cubic remainder bound on the coupling disk. The theorem concerns spectral data of the declared operator family only; it asserts no ramping protocol, no branch population, no relaxation, no transition rate and no measurement.

Statement

Adopt the framework data and the declared perturbed-family model of The declared perturbed-family model: bounded self-adjoint perturbation, isolated gapped label and followed spectral cluster in the simple-label case: H0 is self-adjoint on D(H0), V=V∗∈B(H) with v=∥V∥≥0, H(λ)=H0+λV on D(H0) for real λ, and E is an isolated eigenvalue of H0 of multiplicity one with gap at least g>0, dist⁡(E,σ(H0)∖{E})≥g. Let ψ0 be a normalized eigenvector, P0ψ0=ψ0, let S:=ιQ0(H0∣D(H0)∩Q0H−E)−1Q0,Q0=I−P0, be the reduced inverse of the model clause (c)(iii). In the branch v>0 put R:=g8v. Then clauses (a)-(e) hold for every real λ with ∣λ∣<R in this positive-norm branch; clause (f) covers v=0 independently of R:

(a) H(λ) is self-adjoint on D(H0); the model's followed label Eλ of the contour ∣z−E∣=g/2 exists, is the unique spectral value of H(λ) inside that contour, is real, and its spectral projection is the orthogonal rank-one projection Pλ=EH(λ)({Eλ});

(b) the gauge-fixed eigenvector ψ(λ):=Pλψ0⟨Pλψ0,ψ0⟩ is analytic in λ, satisfies ⟨ψ(λ),ψ0⟩=1 and (H0+λV)ψ(λ)=Eλψ(λ), and q:=2∣λ∣v/g≤14,∥Pλ−P0∥≤13,∥ψ(λ)∥≤2;

(c) the model's label identity Eλ=⟨(H0+λV)ψ(λ),ψ0⟩=E+λ⟨Vψ(λ),ψ0⟩ holds, so the deviation λ↦Eλ−E of the model's energy label is controlled by the perturbation alone;

(d) the exact coefficients are E′(0)=⟨Vψ0,ψ0⟩,ψ′(0)=−SVψ0,E′′(0)=−2⟨VSVψ0,ψ0⟩, with ∣E′(0)∣≤v, ∥ψ′(0)∥≤v/g and ∣E′′(0)∣≤2v2/g; the second-order coefficient involves the whole complementary spectral subspace of H0 through S, continuum included;

(e) the cubic remainder obeys ∣Eλ−E−λE′(0)−λ22E′′(0)∣≤Rv (∣λ∣/R)31−∣λ∣/R, so at ∣λ∣=R/2 the bound is g/32 and for ∣λ∣≤R/2 it is at most 128v3∣λ∣3/g2;

(f) if v=0, that is V=0, then Pλ=P0, Eλ=E and ψ(λ)=ψ0 for every real λ, and no radius involving division by v is used in this branch;

(g) the theorem is conditional on the strict positive gap, on the multiplicity one of E and on the boundedness of V; it asserts no unbounded or degenerate perturbation theorem, no time-dependent perturbation, and no statement about which branch of the family a preparation occupies.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the declared perturbed-family model in the simple-label case; E,g,v,R and the reduced inverse S as in the statement; a real λ with ∣λ∣<R; the Axiom of Countable Choice.

[F1]

Self-adjointness of bounded perturbations. For a self-adjoint A and a symmetric B with D(A)⊆D(B) and A-bound less than one, A+B on D(A) is self-adjoint (Kato-Rellich theorem).

[F2]

Contour construction and reality. Under the hypotheses of the contour theorem (H0 self-adjoint on its exact dense domain, E isolated with gap at least g>0 and rank-one spectral projection P0, V=V∗ bounded with v=∥V∥>0, q=2∣λ∣v/g<1): Hλ=H0+λV is closed and densely defined on D(H0) with norm-convergent resolvent series on the contour Γ={∣z−E∣=g/2}; the operator Pλ=12πi∮ΓRλ(z) dz is an operator-norm holomorphic rank-one Riesz projection, there is exactly one spectral value Eλ of Hλ inside Γ, of algebraic multiplicity one with ran⁡Pλ=ker⁡(Hλ−Eλ), and for real λ the operator Hλ is self-adjoint and Pλ=EHλ({Eλ}) is its orthogonal spectral projection (Contour perturbation projection clauses (a)-(d)).

[F3]

Coefficients and remainder. Under the hypotheses of [F2] with the reduced inverse S of Simple-level reduced-resolvent coefficients and the gauge-fixed ψ(λ): on the complex disk ∣λ∣<R=g/(8v), q=2∣λ∣v/g≤1/4, ∥Pλ−P0∥≤1/3, ∥ψ(λ)∥≤2, the identity Eλ=⟨(H0+λV)ψ(λ),ψ0⟩=E+λ⟨Vψ(λ),ψ0⟩ holds, the coefficients and bounds of clause (d) hold, and the cubic remainder bound of clause (e) holds; for v=0 one has Pλ=P0, Eλ=E, ψ(λ)=ψ0 (Analytic perturbation remainder clauses (a)-(c)).

[F4]

Model data. The model's clause (c) supplies Eλ and Pλ exactly as the followed perturbed label and Riesz/spectral projection of the contour theorem, the multiplicity-one hypothesis, the gap at least g, the reduced inverse S and the reading of H(λ) as the model's sharp energy observable (The declared perturbed-family model: bounded self-adjoint perturbation, isolated gapped label and followed spectral cluster).

Proof

technique · direct; instantiate the supplied contour construction and the supplied remainder theorem at the model's data, with Kato-Rellich for the self-adjointness of the family

Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F4].

1.1F1F4given

[Self-adjointness on D(H0)] The perturbation V is bounded and symmetric with D(H0)⊆D(V)=H, and the H0-bound of V is 0<1 because ∥Vu∥≤v∥u∥; hence [F1] gives that H(λ)=H0+λV on D(H0) is self-adjoint for every real λ. This is the self-adjointness assertion of (a).

1.2F2F4given

[Contour, label and projection] In the simple-label case the projection P0=EH0({E}) has rank one and the gap hypothesis is dist⁡(E,σ(H0)∖{E})≥g, so [F2] applies for every real λ with 2∣λ∣v/g<1; since ∣λ∣<R=g/(8v) gives q=2∣λ∣v/g<1/4<1, the conclusions hold: there is exactly one spectral value Eλ of H(λ) inside ∣z−E∣=g/2, it has algebraic multiplicity one with range ker⁡(H(λ)−Eλ), Pλ is holomorphic and rank one, and for real λ the projection is the orthogonal spectral projection at the real value Eλ. By [F4] these are exactly the model's followed label and its projection, so clause (a) is proved.

1.3F3F4givenalgebra

[Gauge-fixed eigenvector, coefficients and remainder] With the identified objects, [F3] applies on the disk ∣λ∣<R: ψ(λ) is analytic with the displayed normalization and eigenvector equation, the quantitative bounds q≤1/4, ∥Pλ−P0∥≤1/3, ∥ψ(λ)∥≤2 hold, the label identity of clause (c) holds, and the coefficients, the bounds ∣E′(0)∣≤v, ∥ψ′(0)∥≤v/g, ∣E′′(0)∣≤2v2/g and the cubic remainder bound hold. By [F4] the operator S is the model's complementary reduced inverse, so the second-order term involves the whole complementary spectral subspace, continuum included. This proves clauses (b), (c), (d) and (e).

1.4F3given

[The v=0 branch] If V=0 then v=0 and the family is constant, H(λ)=H0; [F3] clause (c) gives Pλ=P0, Eλ=E, ψ(λ)=ψ0 for every real λ without using a radius R (no division by v occurs). This is clause (f).

2.1F1F2F3F4given∎

[Scope] Every hypothesis used above is one of: the model's bounded self-adjoint perturbation and simple gapped label, the strict positive gap g>0, multiplicity one, and the choice assumption of the spectral suppliers. No unbounded perturbation, degenerate label, time-dependent coupling, ramping protocol, transition rate, branch population or measurement entered the argument; the objects Eλ, Pλ, ψ(λ) are spectral data of the declared family, which is clause (g).

Remarks

  • Where the continuum enters. The reduced inverse S acts on the whole complementary subspace Q0H, so the second-order coefficient −2⟨VSVψ0,ψ0⟩ automatically includes the contribution of the continuous spectrum of H0; the theorem needs no discrete-eigenbasis expansion and no sum over bound states.
  • Determinant of the remainder. The bound is a genuine cubic bound on the disk of radius R=g/(8v); no uniformity in λ beyond that disk is claimed, and the gap enters both the radius and the constant.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources