Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct and exchange contributions to a two-fermion mean energy and the repulsive-Coulomb ordering

Physical scope

The conditional two-fermion exchange computation of the declared N=2 bounded or Coulomb model: for a declared pair of orthonormal spatial orbitals and the two declared antisymmetric sector preparations obtained by combining them with the spin singlet and triplet, the mean pair energies are the sum of the one-body means plus the direct integral and minus or plus the exchange integral, and for a repulsive Coulomb pair interaction the spatially antisymmetric (spin-triplet) preparation has the lower mean energy. The comparison is a statement about the declared model's means; it derives no spin-statistics assignment, reports no measured level splitting and makes no claim about a real atom.

Statement

Adopt the state and composition postulate P1 (State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems), the observable and probability postulate P2 (Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes), the non-relativistic kinematics postulate P5 (Kinematics and massive-particle model postulate P5: Newtonian frames and one-particle operators) and the identical-particle and spin postulate P6 (Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations) in the readings of Declared species sectors and their preparations: the framework's reading of P6, Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework and Mean, second moment and variance of an assigned observable in a preparation, and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Take a declared spin-12 fermionic species with mass m>0, the spatial realization of the declared fixed-N model of The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable with N=2, a bounded real external potential Vext and one of the following two pair interactions: (bounded case) a bounded real even W:R3→R; (Coulomb case) W(z)=κ/∣z∣ with κ>0 and Vext bounded. Let u,v∈W2,2(R3;C) be pairwise orthonormal spatial orbitals, put εu:=⟨hu,u⟩⋆,εv:=⟨hv,v⟩⋆ with h=−ℏ2Δ/(2m)+Vext the declared one-particle operator and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩⋆ the L2(R3) pairing, and let D and X be the direct and exchange integrals D=∫R6∣u(x)∣2∣v(y)∣2W(x−y) dx dy,X=∫R6u(x)‾v(x)u(y)v(y)‾ W(x−y) dx dy of Slater direct and exchange calculation clauses (c),(d), as appropriate. Fix the standard orthonormal basis e↑,e↓ of the declared spin-12 factor C2, and define the unit spin vectors χ−=(e↑⊗e↓−e↓⊗e↑)/2,χ+=(e↑⊗e↓+e↓⊗e↑)/2, read as the singlet and symmetric Sz=0 triplet of the declared basis. Let Θsp be the scalar Euclidean product unitary and let Θ2:(L2(R3;C2))⊗2⟶L2(R6;C2⊗C2) be the full spin-product unitary of Finite spin components of an N-fold spatial tensor product clause (a). Put φ±=(u⊗v±v⊗u)/2,f±=Θspφ±,Φ±=Θ2−1(f±χ∓),ρ±=TΦ±,Φ±. Thus Φ± are vectors in the declared one-particle tensor square, not untransported vectors in a regrouped spatial/spin product. They define the two declared preparations after the sector membership proved below. No reality assumption is imposed on the complex orbitals u,v.

(a) declared preparations: Φ± are unit vectors of the antisymmetric sector H2− of the model, and ρ± are declared sector preparations;

(b) mean energies: the means of the declared energy observable in the two preparations exist, are finite and equal mρ+(H2−)=εu+εv+D+X,mρ−(H2−)=εu+εv+D−X; in particular the exchange splitting of the two preparations is mρ+−mρ−=2X;

(c) repulsive-Coulomb ordering: in the Coulomb case with u,v∈W1,2(R3;C) one has X≥0 and therefore mρ−(H2−)≤mρ+(H2−): the spatially antisymmetric, spin-triplet preparation has the lower mean pair energy of the two;

(d) scope: clauses (a)-(c) are conditional consequences of the declared model, the declared orbitals and the adopted spin-statistics sector of P6; they derive no spin-statistics theorem, assert no measured energy difference, compare no experimental spectrum, and make no claim that the declared orbitals approximate any atomic state.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the declared spin-1/2 fermionic species, N=2, the external and pair data of the statement, the orthonormal orbitals u,v∈W2,2, the spin vectors χ± and the vectors Φ±.

[F1]

Full spin-product transport. The unitary Θ2 maps (fea)⊗(geb) to (x,y)↦f(x)g(y)(ea⊗eb). The transported exchange acts as (UΨ)(x,y)=RΨ(y,x), where R(ζ⊗η)=η⊗ζ swaps the two spin factors; its antisymmetric projection is P−=(I−U)/2=Θ2P−(2)Θ2−1. Finite spin components preserve the H2 domain, and a permutation-invariant scalar self-adjoint operator with that domain restricts self-adjointly to this combined sector (Finite spin components of an N-fold spatial tensor product clauses (a)–(c)). Tensor pairings and norms are those of Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases, and the tensor exchange is that of Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power.

[F2]

Scalar spatial products. The scalar product unitary Θsp has Θsp(u⊗v)(x,y)=u(x)v(y) (Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b})). Fubini applies to integrable products and the finite component pairings (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

Direct and exchange integrals, including complex orbitals. For a real bounded even W, the displayed D,X converge absolutely, are real and satisfy ⟨MWf±,f±⟩=D±X for arbitrary complex orthonormal u,v∈L2. For W(z)=κ/∣z∣, κ>0, the same assertion holds for arbitrary complex orthonormal u,v∈H1, with f±∈D(MW), D≥0 and X≥0. These are Slater direct and exchange calculation clauses (c),(d); its proof 2.1 proves Coulomb positivity with only the L1 overlap density, without an unclaimed L2 or real-orbital hypothesis.

[F4]

The exact labelled realization with bounded external addition. Put a=ℏ2/(2m) and Vb(x,y)=Vext(x)+Vext(y). In the bounded case the scalar labelled operator T=−aΔ(x,y)+Vb+W(x−y) is self-adjoint on H2(R6;C) by CC realization of the bounded spatial operator on a finite-component H² domain, with the same finite-component realization on H2(R6;C4). In the Coulomb case apply Fixed-N Coulomb self-adjointness clauses (b),(c) with mathematical masses m~1=m~2=m/(4π2), its parameter ℏ unchanged, zero external singular coefficients and pair coefficient κ. Its kinetic Fourier symbol is then 4π2a(∣ξ∣2+∣η∣2), exactly the physical −aΔ(x,y), so TC=−aΔ(x,y)+κ/∣x−y∣ is self-adjoint on H2. The multiplier MVb is bounded self-adjoint, with norm at most 2∥Vext∥∞ and relative bound zero with respect to TC; Kato-Rellich theorem therefore makes T=TC+MVb self-adjoint on the same exact domain and bounded below. In either case, T preserves the spatial exchange symmetry because its Laplacian and real even pair kernel and identical external slots are exchange invariant. The full labelled operator T4 acts componentwise on spin and its combined antisymmetric restriction, transported by Θ2−1, is the declared H2− with exact domain Θ2−1(H2∩ran⁡P−) by [F1]. No scalar-only application of a permutation theorem is used for the spin-four space. The one-particle h=−aΔ+Vext is likewise self-adjoint on scalar H2 by the CC bounded realization.

[F5]

Weak derivatives of spatial products. For u,v∈H2(R3;C) the product u(x)v(y) has weak derivatives DxαDyβ(u(x)v(y))=(Dαu)(x)(Dβv)(y) for ∣α∣+∣β∣≤2, obtained by iterated weak-derivative testing and Fubini. Their squared L2(R6) norms are ∥Dαu∥22∥Dβv∥22<∞, including mixed first derivatives. Thus the spatial products and f± lie in H2(R6), without claiming an exact unproved Sobolev norm constant (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product). On these products the unbounded differential slot action is (−aΔx−aΔy+Vb)(u(x)v(y))=(hu)(x)v(y)+u(x)(hv)(y); every term lies in L2 by its factor norms. This is an exact-domain calculation, not an application of bounded tensor-map rules to an unbounded h.

[F6]

Finite means of domain preparations. For a unit vector ψ in the domain of a self-adjoint assigned A, the absolute first spectral moment is finite and its mean is ⟨Aψ,ψ⟩ (Mean, second moment and variance of an assigned observable in a preparation clause (a), Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (e)).

Proof

technique · direct; transport the spatial/spin products into the actual declared tensor square, verify their full-domain slot actions, and evaluate the real direct/exchange means

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]–[F6].

1.1givenF1F2algebra

[Unit preparations in the actual combined sector] Orthonormality of u,v makes u⊗v and v⊗u orthogonal unit vectors, so φ± and f± are unit and satisfy f±(y,x)=±f±(x,y). The displayed spin definitions give ∥χ±∥=1 and Rχ±=±χ±. Hence U(f±χ∓)(x,y)=Rf±(y,x)χ∓=−f±(x,y)χ∓. Their L2(R6;C4) norm is one. By [F1], Φ±=Θ2−1(f±χ∓) are unit vectors in the declared H2−, so their pure projectors define the declared preparations. This proves (a).

2.1step 1.1F1F2F4F5algebra

[H² domain and exact one-body expectation] By [F5], each spatial product is in H2(R6), hence so is f±. Multiplication by the fixed finite spin vector means a finite tuple of constant scalar multiples of f±, so f±χ∓∈H2(R6;C4). Step 1.1 and [F4] then place Φ± in the exact domain of H2−. Write q(x,y)=u(x)v(y), r(x,y)=v(x)u(y) and L=−aΔx−aΔy+Vb. By [F5], Lq=(hu)(x)v(y)+u(x)(hv)(y) and Lr=(hv)(x)u(y)+v(x)(hu)(y). Fubini gives ⟨Lq,q⟩=⟨Lr,r⟩=εu+εv, and ⟨Lq,r⟩=⟨hu,v⟩⟨v,u⟩+⟨u,v⟩⟨hv,u⟩=0; the reversed cross pairing vanishes in the same way. Thus ⟨Lf±,f±⟩=εu+εv. Spin independence and ∥χ∓∥=1 give the same pairing in the full spin representation. The unbounded slot terms all had their stated domain inputs.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3algebra

[Pair expectation and reality] In the bounded case, absolute values of D and X are bounded by ∥W∥∞∥u∥22∥v∥22; the crossed term uses ∫∣uv∣≤∥u∥2∥v∥2. In the Coulomb case H2⊂H1, so [F3] gives absolute convergence and f±∈D(MW). For either real even kernel, exchanging x,y in the absolutely convergent X integral gives X=X‾; the two direct diagonal terms are equal to D. Expanding ∣f±∣2 therefore gives ⟨MWf±,f±⟩=D±X, as in [F3]. The full spin-independent pair multiplier has exactly this expectation in f±χ∓. No orbitals were required to be real.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F4F6algebra

[Finite energy means and splitting] By step 2.1 the vectors lie in the self-adjoint sector energy domain of [F4], so [F6] guarantees finite energy means. The unitary Θ2 preserves the energy pairings. Combining the one-body result of step 2.1 and pair result of step 3.1 gives mρ±(H2−)=εu+εv+D±X. Subtracting proves mρ+−mρ−=2X. This proves (b) on the full stated bounded or Coulomb model, including the original bounded external potential.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1F3F4F6algebra∎

[Repulsive ordering and scope] In the repulsive Coulomb case [F3] gives X≥0 under the original complex H1 hypothesis, which is already satisfied by the stated H2 orbitals. Step 4.1 therefore gives mρ−(H2−)≤mρ+(H2−), proving (c). The H1 interaction inequality does not alone assert an energy mean for vectors outside the energy domain. Step 1.1 supplies the actual adopted fermion sector, and every energy compared in step 4.1 is a finite mean of the declared preparation; no atomic-state approximation, measured splitting or derived spin-statistics rule was used. This proves (d) and completes the statement.

Remarks

  • What the exchange term is. X is the integral of the overlap density u‾v against its translate; it is not an interaction between distinguishable particles, and its sign in the repulsive-Coulomb case is the content of clause (c). The theorem compares two declared preparations of the same model; it does not claim that a many-electron ground state is either of them.
  • Bounded versus Coulomb. The bounded case relies on the elementary expectation identity of the math supplier and requires only u,v∈W2,2; the Coulomb case additionally uses the Hardy-type bound of that supplier to make D and X finite and to obtain X≥0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources