Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler's equations Iω′+ω×Iω=RTτ under an adopted torque balance, and the torque-free invariants and principal-axis equations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), used through the inertia suppliers to ensure finiteness of the integrals. Let J⊆R be an interval with at least two points (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let ν be a centred mass distribution on R3 that is not supported on any line through the origin, with inertia matrix I (Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix), let c:J→R3 be differentiable and let R:J→SO(3) be twice differentiable, and let x(t,ρ)=c(t)+R(t)ρ be the rigid placement with body angular velocity ω (Rigid placements, body and spatial angular velocity, and material velocities). Write l:=Iω:J→R3; by Principal axes and principal moments of the inertia matrix, and positivity in the nondegenerate case the inertia form is positive definite and I is invertible.

Adopt the balance hypothesis (B): there is a map τ:J→R3 such that the curve t↦R(t)l(t) is differentiable and (Rl)′(t)=τ(t)(t∈J). Then:

  1. l is differentiable and Euler's equations with torque hold: Iω′+ω×Iω=RTτon J;
  2. if τ=0 on J, then l satisfies the torque-free Euler equations l′=l×(I−1l), and the functions t↦⟨l(t),l(t)⟩ and t↦12⟨l(t),I−1l(t)⟩=12ω(t)TIω(t) are constant on J;
  3. if τ=0 on J and (e1,e2,e3) is a positively oriented orthonormal eigenbasis of I with Iej=Ijej and l=∑jljej, then ⟨l,l⟩=∑jlj2 and 12⟨l,I−1l⟩=∑jlj2/(2Ij) are constant on J, and the torque-free equations read l1′=(1I3−1I2)l2l3,l2′=(1I1−1I3)l1l3,l3′=(1I2−1I1)l1l2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data of the statement, the body angular velocity ω with RTR′=[ω]×, the angular momentum l=Iω, and a map τ satisfying the balance hypothesis (B).

[L1]

The body angular velocity satisfies RTR′=[ω]×, so R′=R[ω]× and R′(t)R(t)T=[Rω]×; it is differentiable because it is a finite sum of products of entries of R and R′ Rigid placements, body and spatial angular velocity, and material velocities, The skew-matrix/cross-product correspondence [ω]×z=ω×z and its conjugation law R[ω]×RT=[Rω]×.

[L4]

I is symmetric and positive definite, hence invertible; and for the eigenbasis Iej=Ijej with Ij>0 one has I−1ej=Ij−1ej Symmetry, the quadratic identity ωTIω=∫∥ω×ρ∥22 dν, and the positive-definiteness criterion for the inertia matrix, Principal axes and principal moments of the inertia matrix, and positivity in the nondegenerate case.

[L5]

The cross product is bilinear and alternating, and ⟨u×v,w⟩=det⁡[u v w], so u×v is orthogonal to u and to v The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The cross product in R3.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3

By [L1] the angular velocity ω is differentiable, hence so is l=Iω; the product Rl satisfies (Rl)′=R′l+Rl′ by [L3], and R′l=R[ω]×l=R(ω×l) by [L1] and [L3].

2.1step 1.1givenL2L3L7algebra

By the balance hypothesis (B) and step 1.1, τ=R(ω×l+l′). Multiplying by RT and using [L2] and linearity of matrix-vector multiplication gives RTτ=ω×l+l′. Since l=Iω with I a constant matrix, l′=Iω′ by the finite-sum and scalar rules of [L7], and ω×l=ω×Iω; therefore Iω′+ω×Iω=RTτ, which is clause 1.

3.1step 2.1givenL4L5algebra

Assume τ=0. Then step 2.1 gives Iω′=−ω×Iω; multiplying by I−1 from [L4] gives ω′=−I−1(ω×Iω), hence l′=Iω′=−(ω×Iω)=(Iω)×ω=l×(I−1l), using antisymmetry of the cross product [L5] and I−1l=ω [L4]. This is the first part of clause 2.

4.1step 3.1givenL4L5L6L7algebra

The two functions of clause 2 are constant: the product rule and symmetry of I−1 in [L7] give ddt⟨l,l⟩=2⟨l′,l⟩=2⟨l×(I−1l),l⟩ and ddt12⟨l,I−1l⟩=⟨l′,I−1l⟩=⟨l×(I−1l),I−1l⟩. Both inner products vanish because a cross product is orthogonal to each of its factors [L5]. Also ddt12⟨l,I−1l⟩=ddt12ωTIω because I−1l=ω and I is symmetric [L4], [L6]. These functions are continuous on the solution interval J and differentiable at every interior point, so their zero derivatives make them constant by A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant.

5.1step 4.1givenL4L6algebra

For the eigenbasis, l=∑jljej gives I−1l=∑j(lj/Ij)ej by [L4]; by orthonormality ⟨l,l⟩=∑jlj2 and 12⟨l,I−1l⟩=∑jlj2/(2Ij), and these are constant by step 4.1.

6.1step 5.1givenL2L5algebra∎

Let Q have columns (e1,e2,e3) in the standard basis. The positive orientation and orthonormality give Q∈SO(3); [L2] gives Q(u×v)=(Qu)×(Qv) from the skew/cross correspondence. Thus the standard cross-product coordinate formula applies in this principal basis. Coordinate-wise, l′=l×(I−1l) reads l1′=l2(l3/I3)−l3(l2/I2)=(1/I3−1/I2)l2l3, l2′=l3(l1/I1)−l1(l3/I3)=(1/I1−1/I3)l1l3 and l3′=l1(l2/I2)−l2(l1/I1)=(1/I2−1/I1)l1l2, using the coordinate formula for the cross product [L5] and step 5.1. An arbitrary orthonormal eigenbasis can be made positively oriented by negating one eigenvector; neither its eigenvalues nor the coordinate-free motion/invariant claims change. This is clause 3.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources