Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symmetry, the quadratic identity ωTIω=∫∥ω×ρ∥22 dν, and the positive-definiteness criterion for the inertia matrix

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), used only in [L1], through Finiteness of the moments of a bounded finite Borel measure on R3, to make the entries of I finite real numbers. Let ν be a mass distribution on R3 with total mass m=ν(R3) and inertia matrix I=I(ν) (Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix). Write ωTIω:=∑j,k=13ωjIjkωk for the quadratic form of I on R3 and ∥⋅∥2 for the Euclidean norm (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). Then:

  1. I is symmetric: Ijk=Ikj for all j,k.
  2. For every ω∈R3, ωTIω=∫∥ω×ρ∥22 dν(ρ) ≥0, the cross product being that of The cross product in R3.
  3. The symmetric bilinear form (u,v)↦uTIv on R3 is therefore positive semidefinite (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form); for each ω≠0, writing Rω={tω:t∈R}, one has ωTIω=0 if and only if ν(R3∖Rω)=0. Thus it is positive definite if and only if ν(R3∖Rω)>0 for every ω≠0, that is, no line through the origin carries the entire mass (Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure).
  4. If the form is positive definite, then I is invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A mass distribution ν with inertia matrix I and a vector ω∈R3.

[L1]

Ijk=∫(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk) dν is a finite real number for every j,k, by the finiteness lemma for bounded finite measures Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix, Finiteness of the moments of a bounded finite Borel measure on R3.

[L2]

The integral is linear on L1(ν): ∫(αf+βg) dν=α∫f dν+β∫g dν for real α,β and integrable f,g The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ).

[L3]

For a measurable h≥0 with ∫h dν=0 one has h=0 ν-almost everywhere; and ∫h dν≥0 for h≥0 A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral.

[L4]

For all u,v∈R3, ∥u×v∥22=∥u∥22∥v∥22−⟨u,v⟩2, and u×v=0 if and only if u and v are linearly dependent The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors.

[L6]

The matrix I satisfies N(I)={u:Iu=0}; if N(I)={0} then I is invertible Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF I, trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

Interchanging j and k leaves the integrand ∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk unchanged, because δjk=δkj and ρjρk=ρkρj; the two integrals defining Ijk and Ikj therefore coincide, so I is symmetric.

1.2givenL1L2algebra

Expressing the quadratic form through the entries of [L1] and applying linearity [L2] to the finite sum of integrable functions ωjωk(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk), ωTIω=∑j,kωjωk∫(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk)dν=∫(∑j,kωjωk(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk))dν.

2.1step 1.2givenL4L5algebra

For each ρ, evaluating the δ sum gives ∑j,kωjωk(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk)=∥ω∥22∥ρ∥22−⟨ω,ρ⟩2=∥ω×ρ∥22 by [L4] and bilinearity of the inner product.

3.1step 1.22.1givenL3

Substituting step 2.1 into step 1.2 gives the identity of clause 2, and the integrand ∥ω×ρ∥22 is nonnegative, so its integral is ≥0 by [L3]: the form uTIv is positive semidefinite by definition.

4.1step 3.1givenL1L2L3L4

Let ω≠0 and put h(ρ):=∥ω×ρ∥22. This is a measurable nonnegative integrable polynomial by [L1], [L2] and step 2.1. Its zero set is the closed line Rω, by [L4], so its exceptional set {h≠0}=R3∖Rω is Borel measurable. By step 3.1 and both implications of [L3], ωTIω=0 exactly when h=0 ν-almost everywhere, meaning that its measurable exceptional set has measure zero, or equivalently ν(R3∖Rω)=0. Since the quadratic form is nonnegative and finite, it is strictly positive for this ω exactly when that complement has positive measure. Quantifying over all ω≠0 gives the positive-definiteness criterion in clause 3.

5.1step 4.1givenL6algebra∎

Assume the form is positive definite. If Iω=0 for some ω, then ωTIω=ωT0=0, which for ω≠0 is excluded; hence N(I)={0} and I is invertible by [L6]. This is clause 4.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources