Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An equilibrium whose linearisation has all eigenvalues in the open left half-plane is locally exponentially stable

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open with 0∈U, and let F:U→Rn be of class C1 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms) with F(0)=0. Put A:=DF(0) (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case) and suppose that every complex eigenvalue of A (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism) has negative real part.

Then 0 is a locally exponentially stable equilibrium of z′=F(z) (Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system): there are real numbers δ>0, β≥1 and γ>0 such that every maximal solution z of z′=F(z) with ∥z(0)∥2<δ is defined for all t≥0 and satisfies

∥z(t)∥2≤βe−γt∥z(0)∥2(t≥0).

In particular 0 is Lyapunov stable and asymptotically stable in the sense of Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set U with 0∈U, the C1 field F with F(0)=0, and the matrix A=DF(0) all of whose eigenvalues have negative real part.

[F1]

The exponential series defines the differentiable family t↦etA with ddtetA=AetA=etAA and e0=In, and exponential dichotomy gives, since no eigenvalue of A has real part 0 and all eigenvalues have negative real part, constants C≥1, c>0 with ∥etAv∥2≤Ce−ct∥v∥2 for all v∈Rn and t≥0, with no unstable part. To justify this last deduction explicitly, use the complexified subspaces constructed in the cited dichotomy proof, steps 1.1 and 2.1-2.2: (Eu)C is the direct sum of the generalised eigenspaces with Re⁡λ>0. Under the present hypothesis this is the empty direct sum {0} (equivalently the polynomial pu is 1, so Eu=ker⁡I={0}). Hence Es=Rn, and clause 1 of the dichotomy gives the stated estimate on every real vector (The exponential series of a bounded operator, Exponential dichotomy for a hyperbolic endomorphism: invariant stable and unstable subspaces with exponential estimates).

[F2]

Differentiability at 0: for every η>0 there is ρ>0 such that ∥F(z)−Az∥2≤η∥z∥2 whenever ∥z∥2<ρ (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder).

[F3]

Improper integrals: For a>0, direct integration using The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡ gives ∫0Te−atdt=(1−e−aT)/a→1/a by The exponential tends to +∞ at +∞ and to 0 at −∞. if a continuous f:[0,∞)→R satisfies ∣f(t)∣≤Me−λt for constants M,λ>0, then ∫0∞f(t) dt converges absolutely and lim⁡T→∞∫0Tf(t) dt=∫0∞f(t) dt (Improper integrals over unbounded intervals, Comparison tests for improper integrals); the fundamental theorem applies on compact intervals (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[F4]

Compact continuation: an autonomous solution that is trapped in a compact subset of its open state domain near a finite endpoint extends past that endpoint (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it); F is locally Lipschitz because it is C1.

[F5]

The Euclidean norm is induced by ⟨⋅,⋅⟩2 (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn) and satisfies Cauchy--Schwarz (Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation). For a matrix Q, use the induced operator norm ∥Q∥2:=sup⁡{∥Qz∥2:∥z∥2≤1}. By the real spectral theorem, a symmetric positive definite matrix Q has an orthonormal eigenbasis with positive eigenvalues; writing λmin⁡(Q) and λmax⁡(Q) for their minimum and maximum gives λmin⁡(Q)∥z∥22≤zTQz≤λmax⁡(Q)∥z∥22 and ∥Q∥2=λmax⁡(Q) (diagonalize in that basis and use the Euclidean norm) (Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis). Balls are as in Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, and the chain rule computes the derivative of a quadratic form along a curve (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Proof

technique · direct; build the quadratic Lyapunov function from the exponential dichotomy and compare its decay with the norm
1.1F1F3F5algebra

Define the symmetric matrix Q entrywise by Qij:=∫0∞(etATetA)ijdt. Each integrand is continuous and, for standard basis vectors ei,ej, equals ⟨etAei,etAej⟩2; Cauchy--Schwarz and [F1], [F5] bound its absolute value by C2e−2ct. Hence every entry integral converges absolutely by [F3]. The resulting matrix is symmetric because etATetA is symmetric for every t.

2.1step 1.1F1F3F5algebra

The matrix Q is positive definite and satisfies the Lyapunov equation ATQ+QA=−In. Positivity: for z≠0, zTQz=∫0∞∥etAz∥22 dt, the integrand is continuous, nonnegative, and strictly positive on a neighbourhood of t=0, so the integral is >0; for z=0 it is 0. Lyapunov equation: put QT:=∫0TetATetAdt. By [F3] and linearity of the integral on compact intervals, ATQT+QTA=∫0Tddt(etATetA)dt=eTATeTA−In, by the product rule and ddtetA=AetA=etAA from [F1]. Letting T→∞, the left side tends to ATQ+QA by [F3]. Each entry of eTATeTA equals ⟨eTAei,eTAej⟩2 for standard basis vectors ei,ej, so [F1], [F5] bound it in absolute value by C2e−2cT→0. Hence ATQ+QA=−In.

3.1step 2.1F2F5F6algebra

Fix η>0 with 2∥Q∥2η≤12 and let ρ>0 be a radius as in [F2] for this η; since U is open and 0∈U, shrink ρ if necessary so that B‾(0,ρ)⊆U (the implication of [F2] persists under shrinking ρ; balls as in Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space). Define V(z):=zTQz; since Q is positive definite with smallest eigenvalue λmin⁡(Q)>0, choose 0<α<λmin⁡(Q)ρ2. Then S:={z∈U:V(z)≤α} satisfies S⊆B(0,ρ)⊆B‾(0,ρ)⊆U, so S={z∈B‾(0,ρ):V(z)≤α} is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F6].

4.1step 3.1F2F5algebra

Let z be a solution of z′=F(z). On the interval where ∥z(t)∥2<ρ, ddtV(z(t))=2z(t)TQz′(t)=zT(ATQ+QA)z+2zTQ(F(z)−Az)≤−∥z∥22+2η∥Q∥2∥z∥22≤−12∥z∥22, by step 2.1, [F2] and the choice of η; the derivative exists by the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), [F5]). Since V(z)≤λmax⁡(Q)∥z∥22, this gives ddtV(z(t))≤−12λmax⁡(Q)V(z(t)) while the solution stays in B(0,ρ).

5.1step 3.14.1F4

A maximal solution with z(0)∈S stays in S and is defined for all t≥0. Indeed, while it stays in S⊆B(0,ρ), step 4.1 shows that t↦V(z(t)) is nonincreasing, so it cannot leave S through the level V=α; it cannot leave S through ∂U either, because S is compact in U. If its maximal forward interval were [0,b) with b<∞, the solution would be trapped in the compact set S⊆U near b, so [F4] would extend it, a contradiction. Hence it is defined for all t≥0 and stays in S; this positive invariance of S is the property used to verify the stability definition of Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system.

6.1step 4.15.1algebra∎

Exponential decay: by step 4.1, ddtV(z(t))≤−γVV(z(t)) for all t≥0 whenever the solution stays in S⊆B(0,ρ), with γV:=12λmax⁡(Q)>0. A function with nonpositive derivative of t↦eγVtV(z(t)) is nonincreasing, so V(z(t))≤e−γVtV(z(0)). Combining with λmin⁡(Q)∥z∥22≤V(z)≤λmax⁡(Q)∥z∥22 gives ∥z(t)∥2≤βe−γVt/2∥z(0)∥2,β:=λmax⁡(Q)/λmin⁡(Q)≥1, for solutions with z(0)∈S. Choose δ>0 with B(0,δ)⊆S; then every maximal solution with ∥z(0)∥2<δ satisfies the displayed estimate. With γ:=γV/2>0 this proves the exponential bound, and it implies Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability directly: given ε>0 small, choosing initial data with ∥z(0)∥2<δ′ where δ′≤δ and βδ′<ε keeps ∥z(t)∥2<ε for all t≥0, and the bound gives convergence to 0.

Remarks

  • The quadratic form Q is the classical Lyapunov matrix ∫0∞etATetA dt, positive definite exactly because all eigenvalues of A lie in the open left half-plane. The proof uses the exponential dichotomy only through the estimate of [F1]; hyperbolicity with a nonempty unstable part would require the indefinite quadratic form of A hyperbolic equilibrium whose linearisation has an eigenvalue with positive real part is unstable instead.

  • The conclusion is local: the constants δ,β,γ depend on the field F and are not uniform over an arbitrary family of systems. The theorem does not assert a global domain of attraction, an optimal rate, or any nonlinear analogue of the eigenvalue criterion when eigenvalues lie on the imaginary axis.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources