Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Parallel-axis theorem: the inertia tensor about a displaced point of a centred mass distribution

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), used only to make the displayed integrals finite. Let ν be a mass distribution on R3 with total mass m=ν(R3)∈(0,+∞) that is centred, that is, μ(ν)=∫ρ dν(ρ)=0∈R3 (Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix), and let I(ν) be its inertia matrix. Then for every a∈R3 the inertia tensor of ν about a (The inertia tensor of a finite bounded Borel measure about any point of R3) satisfies

Iν(a)=I(ν)+m(∥a∥22I3−aaT),

where ∥⋅∥2 is the Euclidean norm, I3 the identity matrix and aaT the matrix product of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The vector space Mm×n(F):=F m×n of m by n matrices over a field, with entrywise operations and Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes. Entrywise,

Iν(a)jk=I(ν)jk+m(∥a∥22δjk−ajak)(j,k∈{1,2,3}).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A centred mass distribution ν with total mass m, a point a∈R3, and the notation of Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix and The inertia tensor of a finite bounded Borel measure about any point of R3: the first moment μ(ν), the inertia matrix I(ν) with I(ν)jk=∫(∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk) dν, and the inertia tensor Iν(a) with Iν(a)jk=∫(∥ρ−a∥22δjk−(ρj−aj)(ρk−ak)) dν.

[L1]

Finiteness and integrability (Finiteness and a uniform bound for the entries of the inertia tensor about an arbitrary point, Finiteness of the moments of a bounded finite Borel measure on R3, Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix): the functions ρ↦ρj, ρ↦ρjρk, and the shifted polynomials ∥ρ−a∥22δjk−(ρj−aj)(ρk−ak) are ν-integrable; the entries Iν(a)jk, I(ν)jk and μ(ν)j are finite real numbers.

[L2]

Linearity of the Lebesgue integral on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, Integral over a measurable subset): for real α,β and integrable real functions f,g, the combination αf+βg is integrable and ∫(αf+βg) dν=α∫f dν+β∫g dν.

[L3]

Centredness and total mass (Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function): ∫ρj dν=μ(ν)j=0 for each j, and the constant function 1 has ∫1 dν=ν(R3)=m.

[L4]

Component algebra (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes): for all ρ,a∈R3 and all j,k, ∥ρ−a∥22=∥ρ∥22−2⟨ρ,a⟩+∥a∥22,(ρj−aj)(ρk−ak)=ρjρk−ρjak−ajρk+ajak, and ⟨ρ,a⟩=∑lalρl.

Proof

Proof technique: direct; expand the shifted integrand into the parent integrand plus constants and linear terms, and integrate termwise, the linear terms vanishing by centredness.

1.1givenL4algebra

Expansion of the integrand: for every ρ∈R3 and all j,k, [L4] gives ∥ρ−a∥22δjk−(ρj−aj)(ρk−ak)=[∥ρ∥22δjk−ρjρk]+[∥a∥22δjk−ajak]+[−2⟨ρ,a⟩δjk+ρjak+ajρk].

2.1step 1.1givenL1L2

Integrability of the pieces: the first bracket is integrable by [L1]; the second bracket is a constant function and hence integrable because ν(R3)<+∞; the functions ρ↦ρj are integrable by [L1], so the third bracket is a finite real linear combination of integrable functions and is integrable by [L2].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L2L3algebra

Termwise integration: applying [L2] to the decomposition of step 1.1 and using the defining integrals of [L1] and the values of [L3], Iν(a)jk=I(ν)jk+m(∥a∥22δjk−ajak)−2δjk∑lalμ(ν)l+akμ(ν)j+ajμ(ν)k, and every term of the last group vanishes because μ(ν)=0.

4.1step 3.1L4algebra∎

Conclusion in matrix form: reading the entrywise identity of step 3.1 as a matrix identity gives Iν(a)=I(ν)+m(∥a∥22I3−aaT), which is the statement.

Remarks

  • Centredness is exactly what is used. The proof shows that for a general mass distribution the same expansion leaves the additional terms −2(⟨a,μ(ν)⟩)δjk+akμ(ν)j+ajμ(ν)k; the centred case is the classical parallel-axis form, and the theorem asserts nothing about the non-centred case beyond this displayed expansion.

  • Shape independence. The derivation uses only the finiteness of the first and second moments and the vanishing of the first moment, so the conclusion covers positive-total-mass point, line, surface and volume distributions alike: ν is an arbitrary bounded finite Borel measure of positive total mass, as in Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources