Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dimension threshold for the infinite-lattice massless Gaussian Green integral

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω, meaning every sequence (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets has a function f with f(n)∈Xn for every n. Let integer d≥1, parameter κ>0, and k=(k1,…,kd)∈[−π,π]d, and put

Dd(k):=4∑j=1dsin⁡2(kj/2).

Here λd is d-dimensional Lebesgue measure restricted to the cube. For a measurable function h:[−π,π]d→R, write h+=max⁡{h,0} and h−=max⁡{−h,0}; its signed Lebesgue integral is ∫h+ dλd−∫h− dλd when at most one of these two integrals is infinite, and h is integrable when ∫∣h∣ dλd<+∞. For x=(x1,…,xd)∈Zd, define k⋅x:=∑j=1dkjxj and ∣k∣22:=∑j=1dkj2. Define the massless infinite-lattice Green integral when it is finite by

Gd,κ(x):=(2π)−d∫[−π,π]dcos⁡(k⋅x)κDd(k) dλd(k),

where the integrand is assigned value 0 at k=0, a choice that does not affect the integral because a singleton has Lebesgue measure zero. If d>2, this integral is absolutely finite for every fixed x∈Zd. If 1≤d≤2, the nonnegative diagonal integral with x=0 is +∞. Thus the dimension threshold concerns this free Gaussian Fourier integral; it does not assert an interacting critical exponent or a continuum scaling limit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, an integer d≥1, κ>0, x∈Zd, the cube [−π,π]d with Euclidean Lebesgue measure, and Dd as in the Statement.

[F1]

For ∣u∣≤π/2, 2∣u∣/π≤∣sin⁡u∣≤∣u∣ (Chord and Lipschitz bounds for sine).

[F3]

The nonnegative Lebesgue integral is monotone and additive for finite sums; increasing nonnegative measurable functions pass to their limit under the integral (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F4]

A continuous real function is Borel measurable, and a geometric series with ratio in (0,1) has finite sum (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges).

[F5]

∣cos⁡t∣≤1 for every real t (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).

[F6]

The real signed Lebesgue integral and the criterion ∫∣h∣ dλd<+∞ for finite integrability are as stated in the real-integral definition linked above; the nonnegative integrals used in the comparison are those of The nonnegative Lebesgue integral.

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

For k≠0, apply [F1] to u=kj/2 in each coordinate and square the bounds. Summing yields 4π2∣k∣22≤Dd(k)≤∣k∣22, where ∣k∣22=∑jkj2. The denominator is positive off the origin, so its reciprocal is continuous on the cube with the origin removed. Extending it by the stated value at the closed singleton {0} makes it Borel measurable: each open-set preimage is the union of a Borel subset of that complement and, when applicable, the singleton. The cosine numerator is continuous, so all nonnegative comparison integrands below are measurable by [F4].

2.1givenF2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For j≥0, let Qj=[−2−j,2−j]d∖[−2−(j+1),2−(j+1)]d. The sets are pairwise disjoint, are contained in [−1,1]d, and by [F2] have measure (2d−1)2−jd. On Qj, ∣k∣2≥∥k∥∞>2−(j+1), so step 1.1 gives (κDd(k))−1≤(π2/(4κ))22j+2. Hence ∫Qj(κDd(k))−1 dλd(k)≤π2κ(2d−1)2(2−d)j. For d>2, these upper bounds sum to a finite geometric series by [F4]. On the remaining part of [−π,π]d outside [−1,1]d, ∣k∣2≥1, so step 1.1 bounds (κDd)−1 by π2/(4κ); that part has finite measure by [F2]. Countable additivity and monotone convergence in [F3] therefore show that (κDd)−1 is integrable on the whole cube.

2.2givenF3step 1.1algebra

For 1≤d≤2, step 1.1 gives (κDd(k))−1≥(κ∣k∣22)−1 on every Qj. There ∣k∣2≤d 2−j, and hence ∫Qj(κDd(k))−1 dλd(k)≥1κd(2d−1)2(2−d)j. The right side is bounded below by the positive constant (2d−1)/(κd) for all j≥0 when d≤2. Since the Qj are disjoint, finite additivity in [F3] shows that the integral over their first M+1 layers is at least (M+1)(2d−1)/(κd); letting M→∞ and using monotonicity gives ∫(κDd)−1=+∞.

3.1givenF5F6step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

If d>2, then ∣cos⁡(k⋅x)∣(κDd(k))−1≤(κDd(k))−1 away from the origin by [F5], and step 2.1 proves ∫∣hx∣ dλd<+∞; hence the signed integral in the Statement is finite by [F6], and multiplication by the finite constant (2π)−d preserves it. If x=0 and d≤2, the cosine is 1, so step 2.2 gives the stated infinite nonnegative diagonal integral.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources