Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Harmonic polynomial dimension

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). For k∈N let Pk be the real vector space of homogeneous polynomial functions of degree k on R3, with Pk={0} for k<0. Put r2=x12+x22+x32, Δ=∂12+∂22+∂32, and Hk=ker⁡(Δ∣Pk). Define their explicit complexifications PkC:={p+iq:p,q∈Pk} and HkC:={p+iq:p,q∈Hk}. The Laplacian and real rotation pullbacks extend complex-linearly to these spaces. Then:

(a) for every l≥2, Δ:Pl→Pl−2 is onto and Pl=Hl⊕r2Pl−2 as real vector spaces; the same decomposition holds over C after complexification;

(b) for every l≥0, dim⁡RPl=(l+22) and dim⁡RHl=2l+1, and these equal dim⁡CPlC and dim⁡CHlC, respectively;

(c) for l≥0 and 0≤m≤l, using the exact positive constants blm and Legendre polynomials of Associated Legendre function normalization, set, initially for x≠0, hlm(x):=(−1)mblm(2π)−1/2(x1+ix2)mrl−mPl(m)(x3/r). This expression has a unique polynomial extension to R3, with value 0 at the origin for l>0 and the nonzero constant b00/2π=1/4π for l=0. It is a nonzero element of HlC, and hlm∣S2=Ylm. For 1≤m≤l define hl,−m=(−1)mhlm‾. The 2l+1 functions (hlm)−l≤m≤l form a complex basis of HlC, and their restrictions form a complex basis of its restriction space. The restriction maps on Hl and HlC are injective; a corresponding real basis of Hl is hl0 together with 2Re⁡hlm and 2Im⁡hlm for 1≤m≤l.

(d) let ω,m0,ℏ>0, ℓ=ℏ/(m0ω), and let (ψN)N∈N3 be the complex Hilbert-space eigenbasis of the realised isotropic oscillator in Multidimensional oscillator completeness, with HψN=ℏω(∣N∣+32)ψN, ∣N∣=N1+N2+N3. Put EM:=span⁡C{ψN:∣N∣=M}. Then:

(d1) each f∈EM has a unique representation f=Pe−r2/(2ℓ2) with a complex polynomial P of degree at most M, and the map ΦM:EM→PMC assigning its degree-M homogeneous part (zero if its degree is lower) is a complex-linear isomorphism. It restricts to a real-linear isomorphism from the real span of the same ψN onto PM;

(d2) every rotation R∈SO(3) preserves EM. With π(R)f=f(R−1⋅) on EM and ρ(R)p=p(R−1⋅) on PMC, one has ΦMπ(R)=ρ(R)ΦM; the same identity holds on the real subspaces;

(d3) one has the decomposition into rotation-invariant complex subspaces EM=⨁j=0⌊M/2⌋ΦM−1(r2jHM−2jC), and the analogous real decomposition. The harmonic orbital degrees in this level are exactly l=M,M−2,M−4,⋯≥0, each occurring once as a harmonic-degree summand. In particular not every l≤M occurs, and ∑j=0⌊M/2⌋(2(M−2j)+1)=(M+22) is the oscillator-level multiplicity.

All assertions concern polynomials and the realised oscillator, with no physical interpretation asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real and complex polynomial spaces, r2, Δ, the exact Ylm convention, and the oscillator parameters and basis.

[F1]

Product differentiation gives Δ(fg)=fΔg+2∇f⋅∇g+gΔf, Δr2=6, and Euler's identity x⋅∇q=dq for a degree-d homogeneous polynomial (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, homogeneous polynomial and homogeneous ideal). Sine and cosine satisfy sin⁡′=cos⁡ and cos⁡′=−sin⁡ (published result The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine). For totally differentiable maps f:U→V and g:V→Rp, the total derivative satisfies D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a) when the composite is defined (published result The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). The Euclidean inverse function theorem states that a C1 map with invertible total derivative at a point has a local C1 inverse g satisfying Dg(y)=Df(g(y))−1 (published result The Euclidean inverse function theorem). The polar-chart map T(r,θ,φ)=rΦ(θ,φ) from (0,∞)×(0,π)×(0,2π) onto R3∖K, where K:={(x,0,z):x≥0}, is a C1 diffeomorphism: this is proved in step 2.1 of Sphere integrals in angle coordinates; its determinant r2sin⁡θ is nonzero on that open domain. Thus its inverse coordinates r,θ,φ are C1 there.

[F3]

Pl(t)=(2ll!)−1(d/dt)l(t2−1)l has degree l and nonzero leading coefficient (Legendre Rodrigues equation). The supplied associated function is wlm=(−1)m(1−t2)m/2Pl(m), and Ylm=blmwlm(cos⁡θ)eimφ/2π, with Yl,−m=(−1)mYlm‾ and the full family orthonormal in complex L2(S2) (Associated Legendre function normalization, Sphere ONB). Its angular differential equation gives ΔS2Ylm=−l(l+1)Ylm (Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[F4]

ψN=QNe−r2/(2ℓ2) with QN a real product of scaled Hermite polynomials, degree ∣N∣, and degree-∣N∣ part a nonzero real multiple of xN. The oscillator is self-adjoint and diagonal in the complete product basis, with eigenvalue λ∣N∣=ℏω(∣N∣+3/2); the energies differ exactly when the total degrees differ, not whenever the multi-indices differ. On the finite product span its action is H=−ℏ2Δ/(2m0)+m0ω2r2/2 (Multidimensional oscillator completeness, Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence, Hermite orthogonality).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

[An explicit Laplacian right inverse with the correct degree] Fix l≥2 and q∈Pl−2. Let J=⌊(l−2)/2⌋ and Aj=2(j+1)(2l−2j−1) for 0≤j≤J. Every Aj>0. Define c0=(4l−2)−1 and cj=−cj−1/Aj for 1≤j≤J, and put Slq=∑j=0Jcjr2j+2Δjq. Every term has degree 2j+2+(l−2−2j)=l, and the whole polynomial lies in r2Pl−2. More generally [F1] gives Δ(r2tp)=2t(2d+2t+1)r2t−2p+r2tΔp for p∈Pd: compute ∇r2t=2tr2t−2x and Δr2t=2t(2t+1)r2t−2 and substitute Euler's identity. For t=j+1, p=Δjq this is Δ(r2j+2Δjq)=Ajr2jΔjq+r2j+2Δj+1q. In ΔSlq, the coefficient of q is c0A0=1, each coefficient of r2jΔjq for j≥1 is cjAj+cj−1=0, and the last leftover vanishes since ΔJ+1q=0. Hence ΔSlq=q.

1.2F3algebra

[Legendre parity makes the solid expression a polynomial] Rodrigues' formula in [F3] gives Pl(−t)=(−1)lPl(t) by differentiating an even polynomial l times. After m more derivatives, Pl(m)(−t)=(−1)l−mPl(m)(t), and its degree is l−m with nonzero leading coefficient for 0≤m≤l. Thus if Pl(m)(t)=∑kdktk, every nonzero term has 0≤k≤l−m and k≡l−m(mod2). Consequently rl−mPl(m)(x3/r)=∑kdkx3k(r2)(l−m−k)/2 is a polynomial: every exponent of r2 is a nonnegative integer. Multiplication by (−1)mblm(x1+ix2)m/2π makes the displayed hlm homogeneous of degree l. This polynomial determines the unique extension from x≠0, taking value zero for l>0 and the nonzero constant b00/2π for l=0; since P0=1 and ∫−11P02=2, this constant is 1/4π. In angle coordinates x1+ix2=rsin⁡θeiφ, so the factor (−1)m gives exactly hlm=rlYlm, including the required convention.

1.3F2F4algebra

[Polynomial Gaussian core and the top-degree isomorphism] Write G(x)=e−r2/(2ℓ2). The leading terms in [F4] show by induction on degree that every complex polynomial P of degree at most D is a finite linear combination of the QN with ∣N∣≤D: subtract the matching nonzero multiples of all leading monomials of degree D and apply the induction to the polynomial of lower degree. The same argument uses real coefficients when P is real. Hence every PG belongs to the oscillator's finite product core. An element of EM is uniquely PG with degree at most M, because G never vanishes; equality of the continuous functions as L2 classes implies equality everywhere and thus polynomial uniqueness. On the basis (ψN)∣N∣=M, the degree-M map ΦM takes each vector to a nonzero real multiple of its distinct monomial xN. These monomials are a basis of PMC, so ΦM is directly an isomorphism, and its restriction to real spans is the stated real isomorphism. This avoids the incorrect assertion that different multi-indices necessarily have different energies.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

[Direct sum and all dimensions] Multiplication by r2 is injective on polynomials, so r2Pl−2 and Pl−2 have the same finite dimension. Step 1.1 proves that Δ:r2Pl−2→Pl−2 is onto, hence bijective by [F2]. For p∈Pl, p−Sl(Δp)∈Hl and Sl(Δp)∈r2Pl−2, proving the sum. If a vector in the intersection is r2q and harmonic, bijectivity makes q=0, proving directness. Thus dim⁡Hl=(l+22)−(l2)=2l+1 for l≥2; for l=0,1, every polynomial is harmonic and the dimensions are 1,3. Applying the real decomposition separately to real and imaginary parts proves the complex decomposition. A real basis remains a complex basis of its explicit complexification, since taking real and imaginary parts verifies both spanning and independence, so the complex dimensions agree.

2.2step 1.3F1F4algebra

[Rotations preserve oscillator levels before intertwining] Let f=PG∈EM and R∈SO(3). Since ∣R−1x∣=∣x∣, its pullback is (P∘R−1)G, a polynomial Gaussian of degree at most M; step 1.3 places it in the finite product core, hence in D(H). The chain rule and R−1(R−1)T=I give Δ(f∘R−1)=(Δf)∘R−1, and multiplication by r2 also commutes with the pullback. The exact differential expression of [F4] on the core therefore gives Hπ(R)f=π(R)Hf=λMπ(R)f. Expand the rotated vector in its finite product basis. Since the energies are λK=ℏω(K+3/2) for total degree K and are distinct when K≠M, the eigen-equation kills every coefficient outside total degree M. Thus π(R)f∈EM, and applying R−1 proves equality of the preserved space. Only after establishing this invariance define π(R) on EM. An invertible linear substitution preserves each homogeneous degree, so the degree-M part of P∘R−1 is (ΦMf)∘R−1. Hence ΦMπ(R)=ρ(R)ΦM, also on the real subspaces.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2F1F3algebra

[Harmonicity, complex basis and its real counterpart] On the open polar-coordinate set r>0, 0<θ<π, [F1] gives that the inverse coordinates are C1 and that their derivative is the inverse Jacobian of T. Differentiating the coordinate map with the sine and cosine derivatives in [F1], the Jacobian of T has columns ∂rT=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ), ∂θT=(rcos⁡θcos⁡φ,rcos⁡θsin⁡φ,−rsin⁡θ), and ∂φT=(−rsin⁡θsin⁡φ,rsin⁡θcos⁡φ,0); its determinant is r2sin⁡θ≠0. Matrix inversion gives the inverse Jacobian rows, hence ∂x1=sin⁡θcos⁡φ ∂r+cos⁡θcos⁡φr ∂θ−sin⁡φrsin⁡θ ∂φ, ∂x2=sin⁡θsin⁡φ ∂r+cos⁡θsin⁡φr ∂θ+cos⁡φrsin⁡θ ∂φ, and ∂x3=cos⁡θ ∂r−sin⁡θr ∂θ. Squaring these operators and adding with the product rule, the mixed terms cancel, the second-derivative coefficients are 1, r−2, and (r2sin⁡2θ)−1, and the first-derivative coefficients are 2r−1, r−2cot⁡θ, and 0. Thus Δ=∂r2+2r∂r+1r2(∂θ2+cot⁡θ ∂θ+1sin⁡2θ∂φ2). Applying this identity to hlm(x)=rlYlm(θ,φ) gives Δhlm=rl−2(l(l+1)Ylm−SYlm)=0 by [F3], where S is the angular differential expression from Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The Euclidean inverse function theorem and SYlm=l(l+1)Ylm. The polynomial Δhlm is continuous and vanishes on this dense set, hence vanishes everywhere. Its real and imaginary parts are therefore real harmonic polynomials. Negative indices follow by complex conjugation, and nonvanishing follows from the norm-one restriction Ylm. Restriction is injective: if a homogeneous polynomial vanishes on S2, then p(x)=∣x∣lp(x/∣x∣)=0 for x≠0, and continuity also gives its value at zero. Thus the 2l+1 orthonormal restrictions are linearly independent in a complex space of dimension 2l+1 by step 2.1 and hence form a basis. The invertible pairwise transformation from hlm,hl,−m to 2Re⁡hlm,2Im⁡hlm, together with real hl0, produces 2l+1 real harmonic polynomials which are complex-linearly independent, hence real-linearly independent and a real basis.

3.2step 2.1step 1.3step 2.2F1F2F4algebra

[Full oscillator-level decomposition and multiplicities] Iterating the proved direct decomposition of step 2.1 yields PM=⨁j=0⌊M/2⌋r2jHM−2j: at each substitution directness is preserved because multiplication by r2 is injective. Complexifying gives the same result for PMC. A rotation commutes with the Laplacian, preserves degree, and preserves r2, so each displayed harmonic-degree summand is invariant. Transfer it through the intertwining isomorphism of steps 1.3 and 2.2 to obtain exactly the stated decomposition of EM, with one copy of each degree M,M−2,…. All listed degrees occur because their dimensions 2(M−2j)+1 are positive; no other degree is part of the exhaustive direct decomposition. Their sum is (M+22) by the polynomial-space dimension, and equals the number of oscillator basis vectors with ∣N∣=M by [F2] and [F4]. The same transfer over R gives the claimed real decomposition.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1step 1.3step 2.2step 3.2given∎

[Conclusion] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a) and (b), steps 1.2 and 3.1 prove (c), and steps 1.3, 2.2 and 3.2 prove (d1)–(d3) with the full real and complex spaces explicit. Countable Choice is retained for the invoked sphere and realised-oscillator suppliers; the finite polynomial recursions, finite basis changes and fixed top-degree maps require no additional choice principle.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources