Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-level Sambe operator with Fourier domain

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let d≥1, T>0, ω=2π/T, ℏ>0, and let H:R→Md(C) be C1, T-periodic, and Hermitian at every time. On HT=L2((0,T),dt;Cd) define D(K)={f=(f1,…,fd):fa∈H1(0,T) for every a, f(0)=f(T)},(Kf)(t)=H(t)f(t)−iℏf′(t). Here each H1(0,T) function is represented by its unique absolutely continuous representative, so endpoint values are its traces, and f′ is its componentwise weak derivative. Then K is self-adjoint on exactly D(K). Choose vj and εj from the finite Floquet normal form, so HFvj=εjvj and P(t) is its periodic unitary. The functions ϕjn(t)=T−1/2einωtP(t)vj(1≤j≤d, n∈Z) form an orthonormal basis of HT and satisfy Kϕjn=(εj+nℏω)ϕjn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and Countable Choice, the finite-level periodic Hermitian family H, T>0, ω=2π/T, and ℏ>0.

[A1]

AC is the hypothesis of Kato–Rellich and the periodic derivative theorem; Countable Choice is also a hypothesis of the periodic derivative theorem and the finite Floquet normal form (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

At length T and twist θ=0, The twisted-periodic momentum operator on an interval states that −iD is self-adjoint on {u∈H1(0,T):u∗(0)=u∗(T)} and that T−1/2einωt is a complete orthonormal eigenfamily with eigenvalues nω. In that supplier, u∗ denotes the unique absolutely continuous representative of the H1 class, so u∗(0) and u∗(T) are its endpoint traces; its Statement identifies their trace convention as clause (b) of the interval trace result lem-nrqm-intervals-integration-by-parts. The weak derivative defining H1 is that of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals. The unbounded adjoint is the adjoint defined by representability on the dense operator domain (Adjoint of a densely defined operator).

[F2]

Kato-Rellich theorem states that a self-adjoint operator plus a symmetric perturbation of relative bound less than one is self-adjoint on the original operator domain, under AC. A bounded symmetric perturbation has relative bound zero (Relative boundedness with respect to an operator, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). A continuous matrix-valued function on [0,T] has bounded operator norm, since this interval is compact (For a nonempty subset of Rn with n≥1, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).

[F3]

Finite Floquet unitary normal form supplies an orthonormal eigenbasis vj for HF, the periodic unitary P(t), the propagator equation, and the factorization U(t,0)=P(t)e−itHF/ℏ. Its controlled-dynamics dependency makes U(t,0) C1, while Finite-dimensional matrix exponential and Unitarity and differentiation of the finite Hermitian matrix exponential make the matrix-exponential factor C1; hence P is C1. The identity H(t)P(t)−iℏP′(t)=P(t)HF is derived by differentiating this factorization in step 1.3, not assumed from the normal-form Statement.

[F5]

The componentwise periodic H1 domain is the finite direct sum of the θ=0 domain from [F1]; each component is represented by its unique absolutely continuous representative, and f(0)=f(T) means equality of the corresponding endpoint traces. The derivative f′ in K is the componentwise weak derivative from One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals.

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F4], and the operators and domains in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Let A0=−iℏD on the componentwise periodic H1 domain. For one component, [F1] makes −iD self-adjoint; multiplying by the real scalar ℏ preserves self-adjointness because (ℏS)∗=ℏS∗=ℏS on the same domain by the adjoint definition in [F1]. For d components, the finite orthogonal direct sum is self-adjoint: testing the adjoint identity against vectors with only one nonzero component gives the scalar adjoint domain in each component, hence the full adjoint domain is exactly the componentwise domain. Its orthonormal eigenbasis is T−1/2einωtea with eigenvalue nℏω, where ea is the standard basis of Cd.

1.2A1F2givenalgebra

Multiplication by H(t) defines a bounded symmetric operator B on HT. Indeed, continuity on the compact interval gives M:=sup⁡t∈[0,T]∥H(t)∥<∞, and ∥Bf∥22≤M2∥f∥22; pointwise Hermiticity gives ⟨Bf,g⟩=⟨f,Bg⟩. Thus B has relative bound zero with respect to A0, and [F2] makes K=A0+B self-adjoint on exactly D(A0)=D(K).

1.3F1F3F4givenalgebra

The propagator U(t,0) is C1 by [F3], and the finite exponential in the normal form is C1 by [F3], so P(t)=U(t,0)eitHF/ℏ is C1. Differentiating U(t,0)=P(t)e−itHF/ℏ with the product rule [F4] and using the Schrödinger equation gives H(t)P(t)−iℏP′(t)=P(t)HF. Pointwise unitarity of P(t) makes multiplication by P unitary on HT.

2.1F1F3F4F5step 1.3algebra∎

For each j,n, ϕjn(t)=T−1/2einωtP(t)vj is C1 and periodic; [F5] and [F4] therefore put it in D(K). Using the identity of step 1.3 and the product rule [F4] gives Kϕjn=T−1/2einωtP(t)(HF+nℏωId)vj=(εj+nℏω)ϕjn. The untransformed family T−1/2einωtvj is a complete orthonormal basis by [F1] in each of the d internal coordinates. Multiplication by P is unitary by step 1.3, so its image {ϕjn} is also a complete orthonormal basis.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources