Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The twisted-periodic momentum operator on an interval

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let 0<L<∞ and θ∈[0,2π). Put Dθ:={u∈H1(0,L):u∗(L)=eiθu∗(0)},Pθu:=−i Du, with H1 and the trace u∗ of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals and Integration by parts and the endpoint-vanishing space on intervals clause (b). Then:

(a) Dθ is dense in L2(0,L;C), Pθ is symmetric and self-adjoint;

(b) the functions φn(x):=1Lei(2πn+θ)x/L(n∈Z) form a complete orthonormal family of L2(0,L;C), each φn∈Dθ, and Pθφn=κnφn with κn:=2πn+θL; the eigenvalues κn are simple and σ(Pθ)={κn:n∈Z};

(c) Pθ is the unique self-adjoint extension of the symmetric operator Pθ restricted to the finite linear span of the φn, and its domain is exactly Dθ={∑ncnφn:∑nκn2∣cn∣2<∞}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<L<∞; θ∈[0,2π); the space Dθ and operator Pθ of the statement.

[F1]

H1(0,L) consists of the classes with an L2 weak derivative, the trace u∗ is the continuous absolutely continuous representative, and for u,v∈H1(0,L), ∫0Luv′‾=u∗(L)v∗(L)‾−u∗(0)v∗(0)‾−∫0Lu′v‾ (One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals, Integration by parts and the endpoint-vanishing space on intervals). The normalized sine functions ej(x)=2/Lsin⁡(jπx/L) form a complete orthonormal family in L2(0,L) (Completeness of the Dirichlet sine system on an interval); each ej is in H1(0,L) and has zero endpoint traces, hence lies in Dθ. Therefore their dense linear span is contained in Dθ.

[F2]

The characters ek(t)=e2πikt of Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus form an orthonormal basis of L2(T;C) (The trigonometric system is complete in L2 of the torus, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral), and for an orthonormal family completeness is equivalent to having no nonzero orthogonal vector, equivalently to the Parseval identity holding for every vector (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).

[F3]

Change of variables: for the increasing C1 map φ:t↦Lt on [0,1] and continuous H on [0,L], ∫01H(Lt) dt=L−1∫0LH(x) dx (In one dimension the compact-Jordan formula is substitution over the unoriented image interval with the absolute derivative).

[F4]

Range criterion: a densely defined symmetric operator T is self-adjoint if and only if ran⁡(T−z)=H for every z∈C∖R (Range criterion for self-adjointness, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores).

[F5]

The diagonal operator lemma Diagonal adjoint and graph-core lemma: for a complete orthonormal family (wn) and real numbers (νn), the finite-support diagonal operator is essentially self-adjoint with unique self-adjoint extension T, Twn=νnwn, and D(T)={x:∑nνn2∣⟨x,wn⟩∣2<∞}; the spectrum is the closure of {νn} (Diagonal spectrum).

[F6]

The affine map ϕ(t)=Lt satisfies λ1(ϕ−1(E))=L−1λ1(E) for Lebesgue-measurable E, by linear scaling of Lebesgue measure (A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not). Thus ∫01Q(Lt) dt=L−1∫0LQ(x) dx first for indicators and simple functions, then for nonnegative measurable functions by monotone convergence, and then for integrable complex Q by decomposition (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F7]

Extend a Lebesgue-measurable function on (0,L) by zero to R; Lebesgue measure on R is the completion of its Borel restriction, and each real component has a Borel representative equal almost everywhere under Countable Choice (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra). The representative map [t]↦t∈[0,1) is Borel: the quotient map restricts to a homeomorphism from (0,1) onto T∖{[0]}, and the remaining singleton is Borel; hence the function induced on T from a Borel function on [0,1) is Borel (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).

[F8]

Termwise differentiation of the complex exponential power series gives exp⁡′(z)=exp⁡z on C (Inside its disc of convergence a complex power series is holomorphic and may be differentiated term by term, The complex exponential by its power series). For fixed c∈C, the real-variable difference quotient along x↦cx therefore gives ddxecx=cecx (if c≠0, use the increment ch in the complex difference quotient; if c=0, the function is constant). Classical derivatives of C1 functions are weak derivatives (Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives).

[F9]

The complex exponential satisfies exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡zexp⁡w, and for real x,y, ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex and exp⁡(iy)=cos⁡y+isin⁡y (exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0). In particular ∣eiy∣=1 and eiy‾=e−iy: multiplication gives eiye−iy=1, and a unit complex number has inverse equal to its conjugate. Sine and cosine have period 2π (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi); consequently e2πin=1 for each n∈Z.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

[Density and symmetry] By [F1], Dθ contains the linear span of the complete sine family and is therefore dense in L2(0,L). For u,v∈Dθ, [F1] gives ⟨Pθu,v⟩−⟨u,Pθv⟩=−i(u∗(L)v∗(L)‾−u∗(0)v∗(0)‾)=0, because u∗(L)v∗(L)‾=eiθu∗(0)eiθv∗(0)‾=u∗(0)v∗(0)‾. Hence Pθ is symmetric.

1.2F2F3F6F7F9algebra

[The twisted characters and their completeness] For n,m∈Z, ⟨φn,φm⟩=1L∫0Lei(2π(n−m))x/Ldx=δnm, since for n=m the integrand is 1, and for n≠m the function L−1e2πi(n−m)x/L is the transport under x=Lt of the torus character en−m, whose integral over T vanishes by [F2]; the transport of the continuous integral is [F3]. To see completeness, let g∈L2(0,L) satisfy ⟨g,φn⟩=0 for every n. By [F7] choose a Borel representative of g and set h(x):=e−iθx/Lg(x), also Borel. By [F9], e−iθx/Lφn(x)=L−1/2e2πinx/L=χn(x), so ⟨h,χn⟩=∫0Lg(x)φn(x)‾dx=0 for every n. Define H([t]):=h(Lt) for the unique representative t∈[0,1); it is measurable by [F7]. The affine integral identity [F6] gives H^(k)=∫01h(Lt)e−2πiktdt=L−1∫0Lh(x)e−2πikx/Ldx=L−1/2⟨h,χk⟩=0. Completeness of the torus characters [F2] gives H=0, hence h=0 and g=0 almost everywhere. By [F2] the family (φn) is complete.

1.3F1F4F8F9algebra

[Range of Pθ−z] Let z∈C∖R and f∈L2(0,L). Define A(x):=u0+i∫0xe−iztf(t) dt,u(x):=eizxA(x), where u0∈C is chosen below. By [F8] and the product rule, A is absolutely continuous with A′=ie−izxf∈L2 and A(0)=u0, so u∈H1(0,L) with Du=izu+if; hence (Pθ−z)u=−i(izu+if)−zu=f. The boundary condition u∗(L)=eiθu∗(0) reads eizL(u0+i∫0Le−iztf(t)dt)=eiθu0, i.e. u0(eizL−eiθ)=−ieizL∫0Le−iztf(t) dt. Since z∉R, [F9] gives ∣eizL∣=e−LIm⁡z≠1=∣eiθ∣, so eizL−eiθ≠0 and the displayed equation has exactly one solution u0∈C; the resulting u∈Dθ satisfies (Pθ−z)u=f. Hence ran⁡(Pθ−z)=L2(0,L) for every nonreal z.

2.1step 1.2F8F9algebra

[Eigenvalues] Each φn is C1 with Dφn=iκnφn by [F8]. By [F9], φn∗(L)=L−1/2ei(2πn+θ)=eiθL−1/2e2πin=eiθφn∗(0), so φn∈Dθ and Pθφn=κnφn. The numbers κn=(2πn+θ)/L are pairwise distinct, so the eigenvalues listed are simple provided the eigenvalue set is exactly {κn} (proved in the final phase).

2.2step 1.1step 1.3F4

[Self-adjointness] Steps 1.1 and 1.3 give a densely defined symmetric operator with ran⁡(Pθ−z)=L2 for every nonreal z; by the range criterion [F4], Pθ is self-adjoint.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2F2F5∎

[Diagonal form] Let S be the restriction of Pθ to the linear span D0 of the φn. By step 2.1, S is the finite-support diagonal operator with respect to the complete orthonormal family (φn) and the real numbers κn; by [F5] S has a unique self-adjoint extension T with D(T)={∑ncnφn:∑nκn2∣cn∣2<∞} and Tφn=κnφn, and σ(T) is the closure of {κn}. Since Pθ is self-adjoint and extends S, uniqueness in [F5] gives Pθ=T. Because κn→±∞ as n→±∞, the set {κn} has no finite accumulation point, so σ(Pθ)={κn:n∈Z}, and the domain is the displayed coefficient domain; the diagonal representation also gives ker⁡(Pθ−κn)=Cφn by uniqueness of coefficients. This proves (b) and (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources