Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A logarithmic low-degree atom for the gamma-two graph

Statement

Let L=log⁡n, p=2L/n, and k=⌊L⌋. For all sufficiently large integers n, if Y∼Bin⁡(n−2,p), then an:=P(Y≤k)≥P(Y=k)≥e−4n−1/2L. The binomial variable is a sum of n−2 independent Bernoulli-p variables.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A binomial(m,p) variable is a sum of m mutually independent Bernoulli(p) variables (Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials). Independent Bernoulli edge coordinates in the random-graph model give such sums (The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)).

[F2]

The floor satisfies L−1<⌊L⌋≤L (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m ≤ x < m + 1).

[F3]

The factorial k! is the product 1⋅2⋯k (The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ).

[F4]

For x>0, the logarithm has derivative log⁡′(x)=1/x and integral log⁡x=∫1xdt/t (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[F5]

For every b>0, log⁡n/nb→0 (The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power).

[F6]

The logarithm is increasing and unbounded (The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below).

[F7]

The logarithm is inverse to the exponential (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).

[F8]

The exponential satisfies its addition formula (The exponential addition formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)).

[F9]

Real powers are defined by exponential and logarithm (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention).

[F10]

If Y is a sum of m independent Bernoulli(p) variables, m∈N0 and 0<p<1, then P(Y=j)=(mj)pj(1−p)m−j for j=0,…,m (The Binomial count has its usual probability mass function).

[F11]

The binomial coefficient (mj) counts the j-element subsets of an m-element set (The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|).

[F12]

For events A⊆B in a probability space, P(A)≤P(B) (Basic identities for a probability measure, Statement, clause 2).

[F13]

If a<b and u,v are continuously differentiable on [a,b], integration by parts gives ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v; continuity of u′,v′ supplies their required integrability (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u',v' integrable, then ∫ₐᵇ u v' = u(b)v(b)-u(a)v(a) - ∫ₐᵇ u'v, Statement).

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Prove its conclusions.

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F10F11F13givenalgebra

Eventually L>2, 0<p<1/2, and 2≤k<n−2. On [1,k], take u(t)=log⁡t and v(t)=t. By [F4], their derivatives are u′(t)=1/t and v′(t)=1, both continuous on this interval, so [F13] applies and gives ∫1klog⁡t dt=klog⁡k−k+1. Monotonicity of the logarithm gives log⁡(k!)≤∫1klog⁡t dt+log⁡k=klog⁡k−k+1+log⁡k, so k!≤ek(k/e)k. Counting ordered distinct selections, with each k-element subset having k! orderings, gives (n−2k)≥(n−2−k)k/k!. The exact binomial atom from [F10], applied with m=n−2 and j=k, is therefore at least (ek)−1[e(n−2−k)p/k]k(1−p)n−2−k.

2.1F2F4F7F8step 1.1algebra

Put u=(k+2)/n. Eventually u<1/2. The integral identity gives log⁡(1−u)≥−2u and log⁡(1−p)≥−p/(1−p). Since np=2L and k≤L, step 1.1 is at least (eL)−1exp⁡(k(1+log⁡2)−2k(k+2)/n−2L/(1−p)). Using k≥L−1, this is at least e−2−log⁡2L−1exp⁡((−1+log⁡2)L)exp⁡(−2L(L+2)/n−2Lp/(1−p)).

3.1F4F5F9F12step 2.1algebra∎

The two nonnegative error terms in the last exponential have sum tending to zero by [F5], hence eventually at most 1. The integral for log⁡2 gives 1/2<log⁡2<1. Thus e−2−log⁡2e−1≥e−4 and exp⁡((−1+log⁡2)L)≥n−1/2. This proves the point-mass bound. Since the events satisfy {Y=k}⊆{Y≤k}, probability monotonicity [F12] gives P(Y≤k)≥P(Y=k), proving the lower-tail bound.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.