Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strongly continuous shifted orbits in finite Bochner norms

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Fix 0<T<∞ and 1≤p<∞. Let H be an abstract complex Hilbert space with a strongly continuous unitary group W, and let Y be a complex Banach space. Suppose the actual orbit map h↦W(⋅)h defines a bounded complex-linear map from H into the Bochner space B2=Lp(0,T;Y), with bound CT≥0. No scalar-function realization of arbitrary vectors of H is assumed. Set B1=L1(0,T;H). Here Lq(0,T;X) denotes almost-everywhere classes of strongly measurable X-valued functions with norm (∫0T∥f(t)∥Xq dt)1/q for 1≤q<∞.

Both B1 and B2 are Banach spaces. For every h∈H and every r∈[0,T], define the truncated row Rrh(t)=1r<t<TW(t−r)h for 0<t<T. Its B1 value is this cutoff H-valued orbit; its B2 value is the restriction to (0,T) of the translate by r of the zero extension of the given Y-valued orbit class. Then ∥Rrh∥B1=(T−r)∥h∥H≤T∥h∥H and ∥Rrh∥B2≤CT∥h∥H. For each fixed h, the maps [0,T]∋r↦Rrh are norm-continuous in both spaces, including one-sided continuity at the endpoints.

Interval-step functions are dense in L1(0,T;H): the interval averages on partitions with maximum cell length tending to zero converge in that norm. For 0<r<T and h≠0, the H-valued row has a jump at t=r and has no continuous representative; no assertion of row membership in C([0,T];H) is made.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A strongly continuous unitary group has continuous orbits, the group law, and ∥W(t)h∥H=∥h∥H (Strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group).

[F2]

Finite-exponent Bochner completeness is Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space, and local time translation continuity and convergence of interval averages are Time translations and mollification in Bochner Lp, under The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω). Their statements concern real Banach value spaces. Realification preserves the set, addition, norm and metric by Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric, so strong measurability, norm continuity and completeness transfer unchanged to the complex spaces used here. Countable Choice is spent in these suppliers and in [F3].

[F3]

Norm dominated convergence for strongly measurable Banach-valued functions is Bochner dominated convergence theorem.

[F4]

The spaces and the complex-linear orbit bound use Hilbert space, Banach space and A bounded linear operator between normed spaces. Strong measurability means almost-everywhere pointwise norm approximation by finite-valued measurable simple functions (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).

[F5]

Translations of subsets of R preserve Lebesgue measurability and measure, hence also null sets (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation). The integral of a nonnegative simple function is the sum of its values times the measures of its level sets (The integral of a nonnegative simple function); the nonnegative integral is the supremum over simple minorants (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, the complex spaces and orbit estimate, 0<T<∞, 1≤p<∞, and parameters in [0,T].

Goal: Establish completeness, the two uniform row bounds, parameter continuity and density of interval-step forcings.

1.1F1F3F4given

Fix h∈H and r∈[0,T]. Uniform approximation of the continuous orbit on [0,T] by finitely many sampled values on increasingly fine interval partitions, followed by the measurable cutoff, proves strong measurability of Rrh by [F4]. Unitarity gives ∥Rrh∥B1=(T−r)∥h∥H≤T∥h∥H. If rn∈[0,T] tends to r, then Rrnh(t)→Rrh(t) in H for every t∈(0,T)∖{r} by orbit continuity and eventual agreement of the cutoffs. Each row is bounded in norm by the integrable constant ∥h∥H. Thus [F3] gives ∥Rrnh−Rrh∥B1→0, also for r=0,T.

1.2F4F5given

Write Ah for the zero extension to R of a strongly measurable representative of the given Y-valued orbit. For any real a, translated simple approximants converge outside the translated exceptional null set, so [F4] and [F5] prove strong measurability of Ah(⋅−a) and independence from the chosen representative. For a nonnegative scalar simple function s, translating its level sets preserves each measure, whence ∫Rs(t−a) dt=∫Rs(t) dt. Translation bijects the simple minorants of a nonnegative measurable g with those of g(⋅−a), so taking suprema proves the same identity for g by [F5]. Apply it to g(t)=∥Ah(t)∥Yp: whole-line translation preserves its Bochner Lp norm. Since 0≤r≤T, for 0<t<T one has 0<t−r<T exactly when r<t<T. Consequently the specified B2 row is Ah(⋅−r)∣(0,T); restriction decreases the norm by the simple-minorant definition in [F5], so ∥Rrh∥B2≤∥Ah∥Lp(R;Y)≤CT∥h∥H.

2.1F2F5step 1.2given

Regard Ah as a function on (−2T,3T) and recenter this interval to (0,5T). The local translation theorem [F2], applied after realification, gives ∥Ah(⋅−δ)−Ah∥Lp([−T,T];Y)→0 as δ→0, since [−T,T] is compactly contained in (−2T,3T). For rn,r∈[0,T] and δn=rn−r, the change of variable u=t−r, justified by step 1.2, gives ∥Rrnh−Rrh∥B2p=∫−rT−r∥Ah(u−δn)−Ah(u)∥Yp du. This is bounded by the corresponding integral over [−T,T] and tends to zero. This proves parameter continuity in B2 without requiring pointwise Y values at exceptional times.

3.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

By [F4], H and Y are complete; apply the real Bochner completeness theorem in [F2] to their realifications to obtain completeness of B1 and B2 in the unchanged metrics. Apply the interval-average assertion of [F2] with exponent one and value space the realification of H: the resulting interval-step functions converge to any prescribed f∈L1(0,T;H), proving density. For 0<r<T and h≠0, the left limit of the row at r is 0 and the right limit is W(0)h=h. A continuous representative agreeing almost everywhere would agree with the continuous row on each of (0,r) and (r,T), because a nonzero continuous difference persists on an interval of positive measure. Its two limits at r would then disagree. This proves the claimed failure of continuous representability and completes the stated claims.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.