Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exterior spectral domains and the critical trace index

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2, let Θ⊂Rn be nonempty and compact with smooth boundary, and let Ω=Rn∖Θ be connected. Let A=I−ΔD and HDs(Ω)=D(As/2) with norm ∥As/2u∥2, as in Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Let Hs(Ω) be the restriction of the whole-space Bessel-potential Hs(Rn) with quotient norm, and let d(x)=dist⁡(x,∂Ω). For s>1/2, γ0u denotes the boundary trace obtained by localization to a bounded smooth collar, as in the proof. Then, with equivalent norms, for 0≤s≤2:

HDs(Ω)={Hs(Ω),0≤s<1/2,{u∈H1/2(Ω):d−1/2u∈L2(Ω)},s=1/2,{u∈Hs(Ω):γ0u=0},1/2<s≤2.

At s=1/2 the norm on the displayed space is ∥u∥H1/2(Ω)+∥d−1/2u∥2; at other indices it is the inherited Hs norm. In particular, for 1≤s≤2 the last space is Hs(Ω)∩H01(Ω), where H01 is the H1-closure of Cc∞(Ω). At s=3/2 no normal-derivative condition is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions of the Statement.

[F1]

Exterior Dirichlet realization, H² domain and form domain gives A≥I, D(A)=H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω), and equivalence of the graph and H2 norms. Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation identifies D(As/2) with [L2(Ω),D(A)]s/2 for 0<s<2. The scale notation is fixed by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality.

[F2]

A common exterior extension and explicit collar–tail retraction supplies nested cutoffs, the maps J,P below, their ordinary L2 and H2 endpoint bounds, PJ=I, and the mapping of the bounded Dirichlet H2 endpoint under P into the exterior Dirichlet endpoint. Simultaneous Sobolev extension and localization supplies the corresponding ordinary fractional localization norm equivalence.

[F3]

Bounded smooth fractional Dirichlet domain contract supplies the fractional Dirichlet interpolation spaces, traces and critical distance-weight norm on a bounded smooth open set. Restriction-quotient interpolation from a common endpoint retraction gives [L2(Rn),H2(Rn)]s/2=Hs(Rn) with equivalent norms. Well-defined strip norm and the action of a common endpoint operator transports common endpoint maps through complex interpolation.

[F4]

On a bounded smooth domain, the kernel of the H1 trace is the test-function closure The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions. Smooth multiplication obeys the weak product rule Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor, and Cc∞(Rn) is dense in H1(Rn) Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in Wk,p(Rn). Full Choice, including the countable instances used by these suppliers, is assumed The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and conventions of the Statement.

[F1] Exterior Dirichlet realization, H² domain and form domain gives A≥I, D(A)=H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω), and equivalence of the graph and H2 norms. Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation identifies D(As/2) with [L2(Ω),D(A)]s/2 for 0<s<2. The scale notation is fixed by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality.

[F2] A common exterior extension and explicit collar–tail retraction supplies nested cutoffs, the maps J,P below, their ordinary L2 and H2 endpoint bounds, PJ=I, and the mapping of the bounded Dirichlet H2 endpoint under P into the exterior Dirichlet endpoint. Simultaneous Sobolev extension and localization supplies the corresponding ordinary fractional localization norm equivalence.

[F3] Bounded smooth fractional Dirichlet domain contract supplies the fractional Dirichlet interpolation spaces, traces and critical distance-weight norm on a bounded smooth open set. Restriction-quotient interpolation from a common endpoint retraction gives [L2(Rn),H2(Rn)]s/2=Hs(Rn) with equivalent norms. Well-defined strip norm and the action of a common endpoint operator transports common endpoint maps through complex interpolation.

[F4] On a bounded smooth domain, the kernel of the H1 trace is the test-function closure The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions. Smooth multiplication obeys the weak product rule Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor, and Cc∞(Rn) is dense in H1(Rn) Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in Wk,p(Rn). Full Choice, including the countable instances used by these suppliers, is assumed The Axiom of Choice.

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the three space identifications and norm equivalences, including the critical index and the H01 reformulation.

1.1F2given

Choose L and smooth cutoffs η,a,β as in the collar–tail supplier: Θ⋐BL/4, η=1 near Θ and is supported in BL/2, a=1 near supp⁡η and is supported in BL, and β=1 near Θ with support in the interior of the plateau {η=1}. Put b=1−β, G=Ω∩BL, and let Zu be the zero extension to Rn of (1−η)u. Define Ju=((ηu)∣G,Zu) and P(v,w)=Vav+(bw)∣Ω, where Vav is av on G and zero on Ω∖G. The supplier proves both maps bounded on the ordinary L2 and H2 endpoint couples, and PJ=I. In particular the unbounded tail zero extension is justified there by compactly supported tests, and Va crosses only the artificial sphere, where a vanishes.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

If u∈H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω), choose uj∈Cc∞(Ω) converging to u in H1(Ω). The functions (ηuj)∣G lie in Cc∞(G) and converge to (ηu)∣G in H1(G) by the product rule. Thus the first component of Ju lies in H2(G)∩H01(G); the second lies in H2(Rn). Conversely, the collar–tail supplier proves that P sends the product of those two endpoint spaces into H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω). Hence the same J,P form a bounded retraction pair for the Dirichlet endpoint couples as well as for L2.

3.1F1F3step 2.1

Let 0<s<2. Apply the strip-map theorem to those two common endpoint maps. Coordinate projections and injections give one direction of the finite-product interpolation norm comparison; pairing admissible component strip functions gives the other. Consequently J and P give a retraction between [L2(Ω),H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω)]s/2 and the product of the bounded Dirichlet interpolation space on G with Hs(Rn), with equivalent norms. By the spectral scale this exterior interpolation space is HDs(Ω). Thus u∈HDs exactly when its collar component belongs to the bounded Dirichlet interpolation space and Zu∈Hs(Rn); its scale norm is equivalent to the sum of those component norms.

4.1F2F3step 3.1

The ordinary collar–tail retraction says that u∈Hs(Ω) exactly when (ηu)∣G∈Hs(G) and Zu∈Hs(Rn), with equivalent norms. The bounded-domain input therefore gives the claimed result for 0<s<1/2. For 1/2<s<2, define γ0u as the trace of (ηu)∣G on the obstacle boundary. Its trace on the artificial sphere is zero because η vanishes in a neighborhood of that sphere. Since η=1 near the obstacle, the obstacle trace is independent of the chosen such cutoff: the difference has support away from that boundary and has zero localized trace. The bounded-domain input now gives precisely γ0u=0 and no further condition, including at s=3/2.

4.2F2F3step 3.1

At s=1/2, the bounded input requires dG−1/2(ηu)∣G∈L2(G), where dG=dist⁡(⋅,∂G). In a fixed neighborhood of the obstacle, dG=d after choosing the neighborhood sufficiently small; away from that neighborhood, d is bounded below, while η vanishes near the artificial sphere and dG is bounded below on the remaining relevant support. Also d−1 is bounded on the exterior tail. Splitting the integrals into these regions shows that the bounded collar weighted norm plus the tail H1/2 norm is equivalent to ∥u∥H1/2(Ω)+∥d−1/2u∥2. This proves the critical assertion without identifying it with the H1/2-closure of test functions.

5.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 4.1step 4.2∎

At s=0, HD0=L2=H0; at s=2, the realization theorem gives HD2=H2∩H01 with equivalent norms. For u∈H1(Ω), zero obstacle trace implies (ηu)∣G∈H01(G) by the bounded trace-kernel theorem, since its artificial-sphere trace is zero. Approximate that collar component by compactly supported smooth functions in G and approximate Zu∈H1(Rn) by compactly supported smooth whole-space functions. Applying P to these approximants yields compactly supported smooth functions in Ω converging to u, because a is supported inside BL and b vanishes near the obstacle. Conversely, restriction and smooth multiplication carry any H01(Ω) approximating sequence to a test-function approximating sequence for the collar component, so its trace vanishes. Thus ker⁡γ0=H01(Ω) in H1(Ω). The Hs-to-H1 inclusion for s≥1 follows from the restriction quotient and the whole-space Fourier weights. Combining this with the previous steps proves the stated 1≤s≤2 reformulation and all endpoint claims.

Source notes

The bounded-domain fractional identification is the explicitly imported input recorded in Bounded smooth fractional Dirichlet domain contract. The exterior localization and application above are local arguments; the article under study is not used as a prerequisite source.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.