Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mean curvature at identical spacelike graph jets has positive Hessian symbol

Statement

Work under the inherited ZFC convention. Let (M,g) be a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold of signature (−,+,+,+) with its Levi–Civita connection. Let two embedded C2 spacelike hypersurfaces Σf,Σg meet at p with the same tangent hyperplane P and future unit normal n. At an interior point, C2 means an embedded local parametrization of rank three with C2 coordinate components. At a boundary point, the local parametrization is an embedding of a relatively open subset of {(z1,z2,r):r≥0}, of rank three also on r=0, with all coordinate partial derivatives through order two continuous up to the edge. For the common-boundary conclusion, assume their boundary images agree near p and that their projected interiors select the same side of the projected boundary.

There are local coordinates (t,x1,x2,x3) with ∂t future-directed timelike in which the hypersurfaces are C2 graphs t=f(x) and t=g(x) with equal value and first derivative at the contact point. Use the convention H=tr⁡hg(∇n,⋅)=div⁡gn, where divergence is evaluated using a local unit C1 timelike extension of the future normal. More generally, in any smooth common graph chart with positive future-normal component α=−g(n,∂t)>0 at p, put Ei=∂i+fi∂t at the shared first jet, hij=g(Ei,Ej), and let (hij) be its inverse. Then, with all coefficients and derivatives evaluated at p, H(Σf)−H(Σg)=Aij∂ij(f−g),Aij=αhij. The matrix A is positive definite. The orientation condition holds in particular for future-directed timelike ∂t.

One can choose Lorentzian normal coordinates centered at p, with ∂t∣p=n and the spatial coordinate vectors an orthonormal basis of P. In these coordinates Df(p)=Dg(p)=0 and A is the identity. At a common boundary point the graph functions have C2 extensions across their common projected C2 boundary. A common C2 spatial coordinate change flattening that boundary gives graphs on the same half-neighborhood, and the Hessian-difference formula retains a positive-definite coefficient there; the identity-matrix assertion refers to the unflattened normal coordinates.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The induced tangent form is positive definite, and the sign conventions are k(U,V)=−g(∇Un,V) and H=−tr⁡hk=div⁡gn for a unit normal extension. The C2 version is constructed in the proof. Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F2]

The exponential map is smooth near zero, has differential the identity there, and satisfies exp⁡p(sv)=γp,v(s) for small s. The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection

[F3]

A smooth map with invertible differential is a local smooth diffeomorphism. This applies to the exponential map in the normal-chart construction. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds

[F4]

A C1 Euclidean map with invertible derivative has a local C1 inverse, and for a C2 map that inverse is C2. These results apply in both dimensions three and two below. The Euclidean inverse function theorem A local inverse of a Cᵏ regular map is Cᵏ

[F5]

The Levi–Civita connection is torsion-free and metric-compatible; in coordinates ∇∂b∂c=Γabc∂a. Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class

[F6]

Geodesics satisfy y¨a+Γabc(y)y˙by˙c=0 in any coordinate chart. Coordinate geodesic equation

[F7]

C2 Euclidean maps have continuous derivatives through order two, and their finite componentwise sums, products and compositions remain C2. Cᵏ Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms Cᵏ Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition

[F8]

The ambient metric has Lorentz signature (−,+,+,+); time orientation selects one timelike cone, and future-directedness and orthonormal frames have their Lorentzian meanings. Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model

[F9]

Total derivatives satisfy D(v∘u)=(Dv∘u)Du; applying this to C2 maps and differentiating once more gives the second-derivative transformation used below. The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)

[A1]

The geometric suppliers retain their inherited Axiom of Choice convention; this proof adds no choice assumption beyond ZFC. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The assumptions and conventions in the Statement.

Goal: Construct the stated graphs and prove the oriented Hessian-difference formula, including the normal-coordinate and common-boundary assertions.

1.1F7F9givenalgebra

Construct the needed finite-regularity extension directly in an ambient smooth coordinate chart. For a boundary parametrization q(z,r) on a small half-box, keep q~=q for r≥0 and, for sufficiently small r<0, set q~(z,r)=6q(z,−r)−8q(z,−2r)+3q(z,−3r), componentwise. The sums of the coefficients multiplied by (−j)k, for j=1,2,3, are 1 for k=0,1,2. Consequently every tangential/normal partial derivative of total order at most two has the same limiting value from both sides of r=0. Difference quotients across the edge first give the matching first derivatives and then the matching second derivatives; hence q~ is C2. After shrinking, its values stay in the ambient chart and its derivative retains rank three near the contact point. This gives the required C2 extension.

1.2F1F2F3F5F6F8A1givenalgebra

Choose an orthonormal basis e1,e2,e3 of P by finite Gram–Schmidt and put e0=n. Use the map y↦exp⁡p(yaea) as a normal chart: [F2] gives its smoothness and identity differential at zero and [F3] gives a smooth local inverse. The coordinate vectors at zero are therefore ea, so gab(0)=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1)ab. By exponential scaling, each radial coordinate curve s↦sv is a geodesic. At zero [F6] gives Γabc(0)vbvc=0 for every v. Torsion freedom makes the lower indices symmetric, and polarization gives Γabc(0)=0. Metric compatibility then gives ∂cgab(0)=Γdca(0)gdb(0)+Γdcb(0)gad(0)=0. These Lorentzian center identities have been proved here, rather than imported from a Riemannian normal-coordinate theorem.

2.1F1F4F7F8F9step 1.1given

Choose a smooth ambient chart whose time vector at p is n and whose spatial coordinate vectors span P; by continuity the time vector remains future timelike nearby. The projection π(t,x)=x restricts to an isomorphism on P, because its kernel is the timelike time line and P is spacelike. For either interior parametrization, or the extension from step 1.1, the map π∘q~ therefore has invertible derivative. Apply [F4] to obtain its C2 local inverse; composing the time component of q~ with that inverse gives the C2 graph function. Equality of the tangent hyperplanes gives Df(p)=Dg(p); both graphs pass through p, so their values agree as well. In a general chart with α>0, the time vector is again transverse to P, and the same projection argument applies.

3.1F4F7F9step 2.1givenalgebra

In the boundary case the graph projection is a C2 diffeomorphism on each extended parametrization. Its restriction to the rank-two boundary parametrization is thus a rank-two embedded C2 surface in R3. These two projected boundaries agree, since the original boundary images agree. After a spatial linear change choose two projected components with invertible derivative on a boundary parametrization and use [F4] in dimension two to express the boundary as x3=ψ(x1,x2) with ψ of class C2. Each projected interior lies on one side: in the projected parametrization the differential of x3−ψ(x1,x2) vanishes in the two boundary directions and is nonzero in the inward direction, so its sign is fixed for small positive r. The common-side hypothesis selects the same sign for both. Reverse the transverse spatial coordinate if necessary, and set x=χ(y)=(y1,y2,y3+ψ(y1,y2)). Its explicit inverse subtracts ψ in the third coordinate; it maps a sufficiently small common half-neighborhood y3≥0 onto the selected side. The extended graph functions from step 2.1 restrict to the original graphs there.

3.2F1F5F7F8F9step 2.1algebra

The normal and mean curvature require only the stated C2 regularity. For an extended graph f, put Ei=∂i+fi(x)∂t throughout a small ambient neighborhood. Their Gram matrix h remains positive definite near the graph. With T=∂t and h−1=(hij), define u=T−hijg(T,Ei)Ej. Then u is orthogonal to the three Ei, is nonzero by transversality, and is timelike: the orthogonal complement of a positive three-plane in signature (−,+,+,+) is a negative line. The field u is C1, so normalizing it and choosing its future sign gives a unit C1 ambient extension n~ of the future graph normal. Metric compatibility gives g(∇n~n~,n~)=12n~ g(n~,n~)=0. Thus the ambient divergence trace on the graph equals hijg(∇Ein,Ej), independently of unit extension. Differentiating g(n,Ej)=0 tangentially yields [step 2.1] H(f)=−hijg(n,∇EiEj). All differentiations are valid for C1 fields, including the one-sided limits at a boundary.

4.1F1F5F8step 3.2givenalgebra

Write Eia for the components of the graph tangent vectors, with a=0,1,2,3. The coordinate connection formula gives ∇EiEj=fij∂t+ΓabcEibEjc∂a. At the shared point and first jet, the two graphs have identical Ei, hij and future normal n, and the Christoffel terms are evaluated at the same ambient point. Subtracting the two formulas from step 3.2 therefore cancels every Christoffel term and gives [step 3.2] H(f)−H(g)=−g(n,∂t)hij(f−g)ij. Since h−1 is positive definite and α=−g(n,∂t)>0, this is the asserted positive-definite symbol. For a future timelike ∂t, write ∂t=an+V with V∈P; the future cone in the orthonormal frame with time vector n has a>0, and α=a. Thus that sufficient orientation condition has precisely the required sign.

5.1step 2.1step 3.2step 4.1step 1.2algebra

Apply the graph construction of step 2.1 in this normal chart. Both graph values at the center and both first derivatives vanish. There ∂t=n, hij=δij and α=1, so step 4.1 gives Aij=δij. In addition the vanishing Christoffel symbols from step 1.2 and step 3.2 give H(f)=∑ifii and H(g)=∑igii individually at the center.

6.1F7F9step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

For the common spatial flattening x=χ(y) from step 3.1, let w=f−g and B=Dχ at contact. The first jet of w vanishes, so applying [F9] twice gives Dy2(w∘χ)=BT(Dx2w)B: the terms involving Dw and second derivatives of χ vanish. Hence the contracted coefficient in the flattened variables is A~=B−1AB−T, which is positive definite because B is invertible. Time is unchanged in this spatial change. The C2 extensions and their restrictions have the same derivatives through order two on the boundary, so the formulas calculate the original boundary mean curvatures and do not depend on the chosen extensions. This proves the common half-neighborhood assertion as well as the interior and normal-coordinate assertions.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.