Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive smooth horizon area and the exact degenerate angular-momentum test

Statement

Work in ZFC. Let S be a nonempty compact smooth spacelike horizon cross-section, let h be its induced Riemannian metric, and define its intrinsic area by A:=∫Sμh, where μh is the Riemannian volume density. Then 0<A<∞. For any supplied real scalar J, the equality A=8π∣J∣ implies J≠0. In the degenerate stationary axisymmetric vacuum application, vacuum means Ric⁡(g)=0 near the section. Supply the axial generator Z with angle parameter of period 2π, an ambient orientation and an orientation of S. In geometric units G=c=1, the component charge is the finite-section Komar functional JS:=(16π)−1∫Sj∗(⋆gdZ♭), where j:S↪M is inclusion and Z♭=g(Z,⋅); take J=JS in the assumed equality. These application data do not restrict the arbitrary-scalar implication. This is a componentwise test: it does not require the total angular momentum of all components to be nonzero and puts no condition on nondegenerate components.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Work in ZFC with The Axiom of Choice. In particular The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω) holds: apply choice to the family of nonempty sets in a sequence and compose the choice function with that sequence. Countable choice is the inherited hypothesis of the chart-partition integration in [F2] and [F3].

[F1]

Horizon, stationarity, axisymmetry and degeneracy terminology is that of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses. Smoothness, compactness, nonemptiness and spacelikeness of the two-dimensional cross-section S are explicit hypotheses here. Its smooth induced positive-definite tensor h is a Riemannian metric in Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold.

[F2]

The density Riemannian volume density is μh=det⁡(hab) ∣dx1dx2∣ in a surface chart. By The riemannian volume density is coordinate independent these formulas glue to a positive smooth density independent of the chart.

[F3]

Use Riemannian volume of a compactly supported smooth density with f≡1 on the compact surface to define A=∫Sμh. Under [A1], Orientation-free density integration and its properties makes this integral independent of charts and partition, nonnegative, and strictly positive for every nonzero nonnegative smooth density. The compact-support construction is a finite sum of finite chart integrals and requires no orientation.

[F4]

For the second assertion, the extra data are a specified real scalar J attached to this component and the assumed equality A=8π∣J∣, with A defined in [F3]. In the intended degenerate stationary axisymmetric vacuum application, take the charge JS defined in [F5] for this same section, with the equality in that normalization supplied independently. The lemma uses only this scalar-data contract and the equality; the area–angular-momentum relation remains a premise.

[F5]

For the application terminology, vacuum is the geometric predicate Ric⁡(g)=0 near S, with the Ricci tensor of The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors. Use the chosen 2π axial generator Z of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses. Specify an orientation of its Lorentzian neighborhood and an orientation of S for this charge. Metric duality The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising gives Z♭=g(Z,⋅), and Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star gives the smooth two-form ⋆gdZ♭. With inclusion j:S↪M, define JS:=(16π)−1∫Sj∗(⋆gdZ♭) using Integration on an oriented embedded submanifold. Reall (8.25) fixes the integrand and factor in units G=c=1; the finite-section functional is defined here. Its orientations and axial scale are supplied data. No equality to a charge at infinity, independence of cross-section, or derivation of the area relation is asserted by this definition.

Proof

Given: A nonempty compact smooth spacelike cross-section with its induced positive metric, [A1] and [F1]–[F3]; for the second assertion also the real component charge and equality in [F4]; for the geometric application, additionally the data in [F5].

Goal: Verify intrinsic finite positive area and the exact componentwise nonvanishing consequence.

1.1givenA1F1F2F3

By [F1] and [F2], μh is a positive smooth density on the nonempty surface, hence is nonzero. Compactness makes its support compact, and f≡1 is smooth with compact support. Thus the integral construction in [F3] applies under [A1] and gives a finite real value A: only finitely many partition-weighted, compactly supported chart coefficients contribute, each with finite integral. Strict positivity in [F3] applies to the nonzero positive density, so 0<A<∞. Choice is used only through the inherited chart-partition construction.

1.2givenF1F5

For the application data in [F5], the Ricci tensor is defined on the specified smooth Lorentzian neighborhood, so its vanishing is a definite predicate. The specified smooth axial field has a smooth metric dual, exterior derivative and Hodge dual. Pullback gives a smooth real top form on oriented S; its support is compact because S is compact. The submanifold integration supplier therefore gives a finite real JS. Thus the application supplies a scalar of the type required by [F4], without a physical postulate or a conservation assertion.

2.1givenF4step 1.1algebra∎

If J=0, the supplied equality in [F4] gives A=8π∣0∣=0, contradicting step 1.1. Therefore J≠0. Apply this implication separately to each degenerate component for which the scalar charge and equality are supplied. It uses no sum of component charges and imposes no condition on a nondegenerate component.

External input

The cited Komar definition supplies the normalization recorded in the source contract. The finite-section functional in [F5] is a local definition using the declared mathematical suppliers; the proof establishes its finiteness. The area–angular-momentum equality remains an independently supplied premise.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

H. S. Reall, Black Holes, Part III lecture notes, 15 March 2024 · Conventions, printed p.1; section 8.2, equation (8.25), printed p.109 (PDF page 110).

In units G=c=1, Komar angular momentum at an axisymmetric asymptotically flat end is (16 pi)^(-1) times the large-sphere limit of the integral of star d(m-flat), where m generates axial rotations.

Hypotheses: The cited definition assumes an axisymmetric asymptotically flat end and an existing limit. Only its integrand and numerical normalization are adopted here; the finite-section functional is defined locally, with a specified 2 pi axial generator and orientations. No asymptotic or horizon-transport equality is imported.

Reading limits: Read browser-extracted PDF text at Conventions and section 8.2 through (8.25). No visual inspection, convergence proof, conservation theorem or area equality was checked or imported.

Sources