How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Open–closed continuation for the set of individually admissible parameters
Statement
Assume the stationary vacuum model and the regular non-degenerate stationary spacetime data, with mass normalized to one, original exterior section maximal and . Use the positive-parameter Harrison construction , . Put and denote its ambient closure by . Choose its supplied adapted topological radial identification, with radius , so and . The physical end radius below belongs to the separate stationary end chart.
As in the indexed admissible-end supplier, a section is individually admissible at if it is connected, smooth up to its boundary , spacelike and maximal for , its interior is a global stationary graph over , and on some end its normalized height satisfies for . The radius and finite constant may depend on that section; no common bounds or sections at other parameters enter this definition. Here , and for original stationary height .
Let consist of the parameters admitting such a section. Then . The original section can be used at . The proof uses local openness at one existing section and arbitrary-sequence closure; it assumes no branch or family over an entire interval before proving existence.
Statement references
Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Uniform end estimates indexed only by existing admissible slices
Facts & Assumptions
Adopt the conditional stationary vacuum model and all four regular-spacetime conditions, with original exterior section maximal, mass one and . The normalization and graph conventions are as stated in their definitions. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
Individual admissibility is exactly the predicate in the Statement of the indexed end-estimates supplier; only that predicate is needed here, not its uniform estimate conclusion. Smooth spacelikeness, maximality and boundary regularity use the induced-geometry definition. Uniform end estimates indexed only by existing admissible slices Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
The actual exterior section has smooth connected spherical-exterior closure . Since this actual exterior section is maximal by [F1], its lapse is positive and the stationary flow identifies with . Its adapted topological radial chart places at , without identifying that radius with the physical end radius. The Harrison endpoint satisfies , including near . Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
For , openness starts from a single connected smooth spacelike maximal section at , smooth up to , whose interior is a global stationary graph and whose normalized end height has the stated decay through four derivatives. It gives nearby smooth fixed-boundary graphs with the same end decay. Openness via the weighted implicit-function branch and smooth boundary bootstrap
A sequence of individually admissible pairs on a fixed positive parameter interval, with converging parameter, has an individually admissible limiting section at that parameter, complete up to its included boundary. No interval-wide family is required. Sequence closedness and completeness without an interval-family premise
The real-line distance is and its open balls are . A metric has separation, symmetry and the triangle inequality; metric openness is the ball condition and closedness is openness of the complement. Relative topology consists of traces of ambient open sets. The absolute value makes ℝ a metric space: d(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded Metric space: d(x,y) = 0 iff x = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
In a metric space, a subset is closed if and only if every sequence in it converging in that space has its limit in the subset; the supplier uses countable choice. Work in ZFC, also to choose a section at each term of a parameter sequence. A point lies in the closure of A iff some sequence in A converges to it, and a set is closed iff it is sequentially closed The Axiom of Choice
An order-convex subset of is connected: it cannot be partitioned into two nonempty sets separated by their ambient closures. A point is in an ambient closure exactly when every real neighborhood meets the set. A subset of ℝ is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval Separated sets, disconnection, and connected subset of ℝ The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points
Proof
Given: The regular construction and the individual admissibility predicate in the Statement.
Goal: Prove .
By [F1] and [F3], the actual original closed exterior section is connected and smooth with boundary , spacelike and maximal for . Since on the exterior and near , these properties hold for up to the boundary. The product in [F3] identifies its interior with the zero stationary graph . The normalized height in [F1] is therefore identically zero, so all its end derivatives through order four vanish. This verifies every admissibility condition in [F2] and gives .
Fix , set and , and equip with . The three metric axioms in [F6] restrict from to . Its radius- balls are . Thus every trace of an ambient open set satisfies the metric ball condition on ; conversely, if satisfies that condition, choose for each a radius with . The union of these ambient intervals has trace exactly . Hence this metric topology is the relative topology of [F6].
For any , choose one individually admissible section there. Its hypotheses for [F4] are precisely [F1]–[F2], and . Apply [F4] with . The nearby smooth fixed-boundary flow graphs are diffeomorphic to the connected reference section, hence connected; they retain all the graph, maximality, boundary and end conditions in [F2]. Every sufficiently close therefore belongs to . Thus is relatively open in , and it is nonempty by step 1.1.
Let be any sequence in converging in to . By [F7], choose one admissible section for each term; these are choices only at parameters already in . All lie in and there. Thus [F5] applies on that fixed positive interval and supplies an individually admissible section at . It follows that . By the metric sequential-closedness theorem in [F7], is closed in , hence relatively closed by step 1.2.
The interval is order-convex, hence connected by [F8]. To apply its separated-set formulation explicitly, suppose were nonempty. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 make both and relatively open. For each point of either set, step 1.2 gives an ambient interval whose trace on avoids the other set. Since both sets lie in , that ambient interval itself avoids the other set. By [F8], no point of lies in the ambient closure of and no point of lies in the ambient closure of . Thus the nonempty sets would disconnect , a contradiction. Consequently . Given any , take to obtain . This proves the full positive-parameter conclusion without assuming an interval-wide family.
Source notes
Radu’s Section 5.3, Lemma 5.1 supplies compact-graph background under its stated boundary, topology, lapse and height hypotheses. The present existence-set argument is a local composition of the declared suppliers; that citation does not establish the indexed noncompact conclusion.
Depends on
- Sequence closedness and completeness without an interval-family premise
- Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product
- Openness via the weighted implicit-function branch and smooth boundary bootstrap
- A subset of ℝ is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval
- The Axiom of Choice
- Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
- Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Uniform end estimates indexed only by existing admissible slices
- Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
- Metric space: d(x,y) = 0 iff x = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- The absolute value makes ℝ a metric space: d(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- A point lies in the closure of A iff some sequence in A converges to it, and a set is closed iff it is sequentially closed
- Separated sets, disconnection, and connected subset of ℝ
- The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points
- Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum · Section 5.3, Lemma 5.1 and the following continuation paragraph
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Compact maximal stationary graphs with boundary S_0 disjoint-union C_s and annular topology have a smoothly converging spacelike subsequence under the stated uniform lapse and height bounds.
Hypotheses: Proposition 3.3 hypotheses, compact graphs of topology S^2 times [0,1], converging boundary-path parameters, and bounds (5.10) and (5.15).
Reading limits: Retained prior source-input or attribution record: Consulted the actual HTML Lemma 5.1 and its continuation paragraph. This is compact-graph background only; it does not supply the present noncompact conclusion. The local argument uses the declared suppliers. No source-proof audit is claimed. Fresh maintenance limits: current item and supplier contracts and the local applications were checked; no new reading of the external proof or PDF images is claimed.
Sources
- Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum · Section 5.3, Lemma 5.1 and the following continuation paragraph