Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Open–closed continuation for the set of individually admissible parameters

Statement

Assume the stationary vacuum model and the regular non-degenerate stationary spacetime data, with mass normalized to one, original exterior section maximal and T∣S≢0. Use the positive-parameter Harrison construction gq, 0<q≤1. Put C=Σ0∩E and denote its ambient closure by Σ1=C∪S. Choose its supplied adapted topological radial identification, with radius rref, so Σ1≅{rref≥1} and S={rref=1}. The physical end radius r=∣x∣ below belongs to the separate stationary end chart.

As in the indexed admissible-end supplier, a section is individually admissible at q if it is connected, smooth up to its boundary S, spacelike and maximal for gq, its interior is a global stationary graph over Σ1∘, and on some end its normalized height satisfies ∣Dxqju~∣≤Cqrq−3/4−j for 0≤j≤4. The radius and finite constant may depend on that section; no common bounds or sections at other parameters enter this definition. Here xq=qx, rq=∣xq∣ and u~(qx)=dqu(x)/(4q) for original stationary height u.

Let A⊂(0,1] consist of the parameters admitting such a section. Then A=(0,1]. The original section can be used at q=1. The proof uses local openness at one existing section and arbitrary-sequence closure; it assumes no branch or family over an entire interval before proving existence.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Adopt the conditional stationary vacuum model and all four regular-spacetime conditions, with original exterior section maximal, mass one and T∣S≢0. The normalization and graph conventions are as stated in their definitions. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights

[F2]

Individual admissibility is exactly the predicate in the Statement of the indexed end-estimates supplier; only that predicate is needed here, not its uniform estimate conclusion. Smooth spacelikeness, maximality and boundary regularity use the induced-geometry definition. Uniform end estimates indexed only by existing admissible slices Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F3]

The actual exterior section C=Σ0∩E has smooth connected spherical-exterior closure Σ1=C∪S. Since this actual exterior section is maximal by [F1], its lapse is positive and the stationary flow identifies E with R×C. Its adapted topological radial chart places C at rref>1, without identifying that radius with the physical end radius. The Harrison endpoint satisfies (g1,F1)=(g,0), including near S. Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity

[F4]

For 0<δ<q∗≤1, openness starts from a single connected smooth spacelike maximal section at q∗, smooth up to S, whose interior is a global stationary graph and whose normalized end height has the stated decay through four derivatives. It gives nearby smooth fixed-boundary graphs with the same end decay. Openness via the weighted implicit-function branch and smooth boundary bootstrap

[F5]

A sequence of individually admissible pairs on a fixed positive parameter interval, with converging parameter, has an individually admissible limiting section at that parameter, complete up to its included boundary. No interval-wide family is required. Sequence closedness and completeness without an interval-family premise

[F7]

In a metric space, a subset is closed if and only if every sequence in it converging in that space has its limit in the subset; the supplier uses countable choice. Work in ZFC, also to choose a section at each term of a parameter sequence. A point lies in the closure of A iff some sequence in A converges to it, and a set is closed iff it is sequentially closed The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The regular construction and the individual admissibility predicate in the Statement.

Goal: Prove A=(0,1].

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

By [F1] and [F3], the actual original closed exterior section Σ1=C∪S is connected and smooth with boundary S, spacelike and maximal for g. Since g1=g on the exterior and near S, these properties hold for g1 up to the boundary. The product in [F3] identifies its interior with the zero stationary graph u1=0. The normalized height in [F1] is therefore identically zero, so all its end derivatives through order four vanish. This verifies every admissibility condition in [F2] and gives 1∈A.

1.2F6F7givenconstruct

Fix 0<ε<1, set I=(ε,1] and B=A∩I, and equip I with dI(x,y)=∣x−y∣. The three metric axioms in [F6] restrict from R to I. Its radius-r balls are I∩(x−r,x+r). Thus every trace of an ambient open set satisfies the metric ball condition on I; conversely, if U⊆I satisfies that condition, choose for each x∈U a radius rx>0 with I∩(x−rx,x+rx)⊆U. The union of these ambient intervals has trace exactly U. Hence this metric topology is the relative topology of [F6].

2.1F1F2F4F6F7step 1.1step 1.2choose

For any q∗∈B, choose one individually admissible section there. Its hypotheses for [F4] are precisely [F1]–[F2], and 0<ε<q∗≤1. Apply [F4] with δ=ε. The nearby smooth fixed-boundary flow graphs are diffeomorphic to the connected reference section, hence connected; they retain all the graph, maximality, boundary and end conditions in [F2]. Every sufficiently close q∈I therefore belongs to B. Thus B is relatively open in I, and it is nonempty by step 1.1.

2.2F2F5F7step 1.2choose

Let (qj) be any sequence in B converging in (I,dI) to q∗∈I. By [F7], choose one admissible section Σj for each term; these are choices only at parameters already in A. All qj lie in [ε,1] and qj→q∗ there. Thus [F5] applies on that fixed positive interval and supplies an individually admissible section at q∗. It follows that q∗∈B. By the metric sequential-closedness theorem in [F7], B is closed in (I,dI), hence relatively closed by step 1.2.

3.1F6F8step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

The interval I is order-convex, hence connected by [F8]. To apply its separated-set formulation explicitly, suppose C=I∖B were nonempty. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 make both B and C relatively open. For each point of either set, step 1.2 gives an ambient interval whose trace on I avoids the other set. Since both sets lie in I, that ambient interval itself avoids the other set. By [F8], no point of B lies in the ambient closure of C and no point of C lies in the ambient closure of B. Thus the nonempty sets B,C would disconnect I, a contradiction. Consequently B=I. Given any q∈(0,1], take ε=q/2 to obtain q∈A. This proves the full positive-parameter conclusion without assuming an interval-wide family.

Source notes

Radu’s Section 5.3, Lemma 5.1 supplies compact-graph background under its stated boundary, topology, lapse and height hypotheses. The present existence-set argument is a local composition of the declared suppliers; that citation does not establish the indexed noncompact conclusion.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum · Section 5.3, Lemma 5.1 and the following continuation paragraph

Compact maximal stationary graphs with boundary S_0 disjoint-union C_s and annular topology have a smoothly converging spacelike subsequence under the stated uniform lapse and height bounds.

Hypotheses: Proposition 3.3 hypotheses, compact graphs of topology S^2 times [0,1], converging boundary-path parameters, and bounds (5.10) and (5.15).

Reading limits: Retained prior source-input or attribution record: Consulted the actual HTML Lemma 5.1 and its continuation paragraph. This is compact-graph background only; it does not supply the present noncompact conclusion. The local argument uses the declared suppliers. No source-proof audit is claimed. Fresh maintenance limits: current item and supplier contracts and the local applications were checked; no new reading of the external proof or PDF images is claimed.

Sources