Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Theorem 3.1: complete maximal slices for positive q

PDF p. 12: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 13: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 14: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 15: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 16: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 17: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 18: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 19: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 20: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3; PDF p. 21: Theorem 3.1; §§3.1–3.2.3

Statement

In the regular mass-one stationary vacuum construction with maximal original exterior section and T∣S≢0, for every δ∈(0,1) and q∈[δ,1] there is a smooth spacelike gq-maximal section Σq with boundary S, complete up to its included boundary, whose interior is a global stationary T-graph over Σ1∘. Its normalized end height obeys ∣Dxqju~q∣≤Cδ,jrq−3/4−j for 0≤j≤4 on a common end. The q=1 section may be chosen as the original maximal section. No uniform estimate as delta tends to zero and no q=0 section is asserted. Each selected section has compact smooth physical-end truncations containing a neighborhood of S, with outer boundary its graph over the physical coordinate sphere; positive-boundary-distance trims of those truncations are compact in the interior.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Adopt the stationary vacuum model and regular data with original maximal exterior section, mass-one normalization and T∣S≢0. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator The graph, maximality, induced completeness and Holder conventions are Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights, Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data and Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains. Work in ZFC, including The Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Individual admissibility and estimates for any indexed collection of already existing sections are Uniform end estimates indexed only by existing admissible slices. Compact heights and horizon estimates for exactly those indexed pairs are Indexed compact heights and uniform smooth horizon collars.

[F2]

Arbitrary convergent existing-candidate sequences have the required compact normal/lapse estimates and admissible complete limiting sections. Compact estimates for arbitrary sequences of individually existing slices Sequence closedness and completeness without an interval-family premise.

[F3]

The actual existence set is all positive parameters by the individual-reference openness and arbitrary-sequence closedness argument in Open–closed continuation for the set of individually admissible parameters. This replaces any invocation of an interval-family hypothesis to prove interval existence.

[F4]

The Harrison tensor formula is Stationary Harrison one-form and metric. Under the regular vacuum hypotheses in [A1], Closed Ernst form and existence of normalized potential supplies the normalized smooth stationary Ernst potential σ=f+iψ, with f=−g(T,T), real ψ and σ→1, on the exterior and an open neighborhood of S. For this supplied potential, the regular vacuum, original maximal outer-section and mass-one hypotheses of Positivity of the Harrison denominator and horizon bound are exactly those in [A1]. It gives Dq>0 on the exterior and on one open neighborhood of S, independent of q∈[0,1], so the denominators in the Harrison tensor formula are positive. Under exactly the regular vacuum, original maximal-section, mass-one and T∣S≢0 hypotheses in [A1], Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity constructs the chosen stationary one-form family and jointly smooth Lorentzian metrics gq on the exterior and a common neighborhood of S, with g1=g. Under the same regular vacuum hypotheses, Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product gives the actual section C=Σ0∩E, with connected smooth spherical-exterior closure Σ1=C∪S and a physical asymptotically Euclidean end with compact truncations. Original maximality in [A1] is maximality of this actual exterior section, so the theorem's conditional stationary-flow diffeomorphism R×C→E applies. Its adapted topological radius may put C at rref>1; this is distinct from the physical end radius r=∣x∣. Thus the metric and product required by the graph definition are supplied before any transformed maximal section is selected.

Proof

Given: Only the regular model, original maximal section and the selected smooth metric family. Goal: Construct the stated complete sections and uniform positive-interval end bounds.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4

Use [F4] for denominator positivity, the jointly smooth gq family, its endpoint g1=g and the global stationary product over Σ1∘. Their hypotheses are [A1], and neither construction assumes a transformed maximal section. Apply [F3] to the set of parameters possessing one individually admissible slice. Its original q=1 member is supplied before continuation; local openness uses only an existing slice. Sequence closure is [F2], whose end, horizon and compact estimates are derived in [F1]–[F2] for the actual indexed candidates, without assuming slices at missing parameters. Thus every q>0 has such a slice. The strengthened physical-core conclusion of [F2] applies to each such section, either directly or as a constant sequence: for every sufficiently large physical radius its truncation is a compact smooth region containing a neighborhood of S, with the physical graph sphere as outer boundary and compact positive-distance trims. The same result gives completeness with the boundary included.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1∎

Fix δ>0 and choose an individually admissible slice at each q in [delta,1], taking the original one at q=1. ZFC permits this selection. Only now is an interval-wide family formed. Apply the indexed estimate [F1] to these selected pairs: it gives one common end radius and the stated derivative constants through order four, independent of q. The graph and smooth fixed-boundary properties are part of individual admissibility and the construction in [F2]–[F3]. This proves the complete statement without any estimate at q=0 or an interval-existence premise in the continuation argument.

Source notes

The interval-family existence premise in the earlier generated closedness interface is not invoked. The five new intermediates derive estimates for actual individually existing pairs, establish arbitrary-sequence closure and then apply interval connectedness. Strict limiting spacelikeness uses the upper lapse bound N at most C, giving minus g-inverse(dF,dF) at least C to the minus two; the lower lapse bound is retained for stationary coordinate transfer. A separate generated supplier inference was reported internally for native owner repair, without attributing it to the original article.

Depends on

Used by · 8

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources