Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stable MOTS area–charge inequality

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω for the surface, flux and deformation constructions below. In the smooth four-dimensional classical Einstein–Maxwell model, adopt geometric units and explicitly assume the field equation Gab+Λgab=8π(TabEM+τab), where Λ≥0 and TabEM=(4π)−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd). Here G=Ric⁡−12Rg, with the metric-selected (torsion-free, metric-compatible) connection ∇g, and the smooth non-electromagnetic stress tensor τ satisfies the dominant energy condition: −τabvb is future causal or zero for each future timelike v. Charged matter is allowed; source-free Maxwell equations, axial symmetry and asymptotic flatness are not assumptions of this result.

Let S be a nonempty connected closed orientable spacelike two-surface with supplied future null normals ℓ,k, g(ℓ,k)=−1, and outgoing expansion θ(ℓ)=0, using the general spacelike-surface data with its connection fixed to the same ∇g used for G. Use this connection for the outgoing expansion and for all deformations and expansion variations below. Suppose it is spacetime stably outermost in the exact sense of the spacetime-stably-outermost definition: some smooth γ≥0, ψ>0 give X=γℓ−ψk with δXθ(ℓ)≥0. The derivative is the general spacetime derivative supplied by the expansion-variation lemma, with boost invariance supplied by the boost-variation lemma; no containing spacelike slice is required. Then, with A, e,b and the flux normalization of the general spacelike-surface data,

A≥4π(QE(S)2+QM(S)2).

The stronger source bound retained for applications is ∫S(e2+b2) dμq≤4π(1−gS)≤4π, where gS is the genus of the connected orientable surface (the number of handles). If this integral is positive, gS=0. For a disconnected closed surface apply these assertions to each connected component satisfying the hypotheses; in particular Atotal≥4π∑j(QE,j2+QM,j2). This does not assert a bound by the square of the sum of component charges.

For a surface lying in a spacelike section, a supplied smooth positive supersolution f of its outward graph operator, Lf≥0, verifies the spacetime-stability hypothesis by the slice bridge in the spacetime-stably-outermost definition: ℓ=n+ν, k=(n−ν)/2 and X=fν=(f/2)ℓ−fk. Nonnegativity of a principal eigenvalue suffices only together with an applicable theorem furnishing its smooth positive eigenfunction. No such spectral theorem is silently assumed here.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed to meet the hypotheses of the general surface, flux, spacetime-deformation and slice-bridge suppliers. The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)

[F1]

Under Countable Choice, general surface, flux and null-normal data use the explicit codimension-two interface; smooth deformations and their derivatives are supplied by the local helper chain. General spacelike two-surfaces, null gauges and fluxes Normal deformation families and an outgoing null gauge Outgoing expansion variation at a general MOTS MOTS boosts preserve the spacetime stability sign

[F2]

Spacetime stably outermost means exactly the quantified outgoing variation condition; the same interface supplies the explicit slice supersolution bridge. Spacetime stably outermost condition and the slice bridge

[F3]

The displayed Einstein equation with electromagnetic stress plus general non-electromagnetic matter is an explicit physical model assumption, in the geometric normalization of Dain–Jaramillo–Reiris equations (1)–(2). The source permits charged non-electromagnetic matter satisfying DEC.

[F4]

The dominant energy condition is the stated algebraic condition on the non-electromagnetic stress tensor. Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary

[F5]

Dain–Jaramillo–Reiris Theorem 2.1 supplies the area–charge conclusion, and its proof equation (31) supplies the retained squared-density bound, under these exact hypotheses.

[F6]

The metric-selected connection is the unique torsion-free, metric-compatible connection of g. The general surface and deformation interfaces are used with this same ∇g for expansion and variation, as required by the Levi–Civita convention at the start of Dain–Jaramillo–Reiris §3. Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class

External input

The area–charge theorem and the stronger squared-density bound are imported from Dain–Jaramillo–Reiris Theorem 2.1 and equation (31), not claimed as locally reconstructed proofs. The surface expansion and its variation use the same Levi–Civita connection ∇g as the curvature in the field equation, matching the opening convention of source §3. The source's null normals satisfy g(ℓ,k)=−1, its MOTS condition is θ(ℓ)=0, and its Definitions 3.1–3.2 require a positive stability weight in an outgoing non-timelike normal direction. The field equation has the sign G+Λg=8π(TEM+τ) and the factor 1/(4π) in TEM. Under the explicitly assumed Countable Choice, the local helpers supply the general null variation and its exact relation to the slice graph derivative, so the import does not restrict the source's surface to a spacelike section. Connectedness is explicit for the genus and single-surface inequality; componentwise application preserves the valid disconnected scope. The field-law and energy hypotheses must be established in each application; this import neither establishes them nor proves spectral stability of a particular surface.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

S. Dain, J. L. Jaramillo and M. Reiris, Area-charge inequality for black holes, arXiv:1109.5602v1 · Theorem 2.1 and equations (1)–(4), PDF pp. 2–3; §3, equations (17)–(20), Definitions 3.1–3.2, PDF p. 7; Lemma 3.3 and equation (21), PDF p. 8; Lemma 3.4, equation (24), PDF p. 9; proof of Theorem 2.1, equations (30)–(34), PDF p. 10

For an orientable closed marginally outer trapped surface satisfying spacetime stably outermost stability, Einstein equation G+Lambda g=8pi(T_EM+tau), Lambda>=0 and DEC for tau imply A>=4pi(Q_E^2+Q_M^2), with charges normalized by (4pi)^-1 times the dual and ordinary Maxwell flux. The source stability is X=gamma ell-psi k with gamma>=0, psi>0, g(ell,k)=-1 and delta_X theta_(ell)>=0. Equation (31) also gives the integral bound on squared electric and magnetic normal components by 4pi(1-genus) for a connected surface. No symmetry or source-free Maxwell hypothesis is imposed.

Hypotheses: Smooth oriented, time-oriented four-dimensional Lorentzian spacetime and smooth spacelike closed orientable MOTS with outgoing global null pair and the stated spacetime stability; nonnegative cosmological constant, standard Maxwell stress tensor and non-electromagnetic matter satisfying DEC. Connected surface is explicit when using its genus in (21), (23), (31); disconnected surfaces are treated componentwise, not by squaring the sum of all component charges.

Reading limits: For this connection-interface repair, consulted the PDF text extraction of Theorem 2.1, equations (1)–(4), the comparison paragraphs on PDF p. 3, and §3 through the proof of Theorem 2.1, equations (17)–(34), PDF pp. 7–10. Screenshot requests for PDF pp. 7 and 10 failed; no successful visual inspection is claimed. The opening paragraph of §3 explicitly fixes the Levi–Civita connection. Did not consult source references [2], [3], [7], reconstruct Gauss–Bonnet, or independently audit the source proof. The theorem and equation (31) remain explicit external inputs. The five existing local helpers supply the surface/deformation and slice interfaces under their stated Countable Choice assumption. Equations (1)–(2) specify the general Einstein–Maxwell matter assumption used here; they do not establish empirical validity or existence of a model.

Sources