Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized free chains preserve products of homology equivalences

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a simplicial set T, let M(T)n=Z[Tn] with differential ∑i=0n(−1)idi, zero out of degree zero. Write C(T)=NZ[T] for its normalized free integral chains, where N(A)n=⋂i<nker⁡di and the normalized differential is (−1)ndn. A quasi-isomorphism is a chain map inducing isomorphisms on every homology group. There is a natural chain-homotopy equivalence, or equivalently its natural comparison zigzag, C(T×V)≃Tot⁡(C(T)⊗ZC(V)). Here the degree-n total group is ⨁p+q=nC(T)p⊗C(V)q, and its differential on a⊗b is da⊗b+(−1)pa⊗db. Thus if f:T→T′ and g:V→V′ induce integral chain quasi-isomorphisms, so does f×g. No connectedness or finiteness condition on these simplicial sets is required.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Choice is retained for the direct-summand-of-free implication in [F4]. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Source reference 0 supplies the natural Moore product-chain comparison and its inverse up to natural chain homotopies, for arbitrary simplicial sets with the stated total signs.

[F2]

The inclusion of normalized chains into Moore chains is a natural chain-homotopy equivalence. This interface is used for chain comparisons; the degreewise splitting needed below is verified locally in step 2.1. Normalized simplicial chains, prism homotopies and the abelian trivial-fibration criterion

[F3]

Reindex a nonnegative chain complex by Ea=E−a, with the same differential. It is bounded above as a cochain complex. The total differential and signs agree because (−1)−p=(−1)p. A bounded-above complex of flat modules preserves quasi-isomorphisms between bounded-above complexes, on either tensor side. Bounded above flat tensor complexes preserve quasi isomorphisms

[F4]

Under Choice, a direct summand of a free module is projective, and every projective module over the commutative ring Z is flat. Equivalent characterizations of projective modules Every projective module over a commutative ring is flat

[F5]

Simplicial sets have degreewise products, and their maps commute with all faces and degeneracies. Applying the free abelian group construction degreewise gives a simplicial abelian group. Use the concrete model Z[Tn]=Z(Tn) of finitely supported integral coefficients, with basis [t]; extension of a set map is [t]↦[f(t)]. Finite linear extension gives its free abelian universal property, since any homomorphism is determined by these basis values. The simplicial identities hold after extension and make the Moore differential square to zero. Simplicial sets, homotopies and trivial Kan fibrations Free abelian group on a set The free module on a set and its standard basis Simplicial objects, simplicial commutative rings and homotopy groups

[F6]

Chain differentials have degree −1, homology is cycles modulo boundaries, a chain homotopy h has degree +1 with u−v=dh+hd, and a chain-homotopy equivalence has an inverse up to such homotopies. Every such equivalence induces homology isomorphisms, and homology respects identities and composition. Chain complex in an abelian category Homology object of a chain complex A chain homotopy A chain homotopy equivalence A chain homotopy equivalence is a quasi-isomorphism Homology respects identities and composition

[F7]

Tensor totals use direct sums and the Koszul differential displayed in the Statement; here each nonnegative degree diagonal is finite. On maps the tensor total sends u,v to a⊗b↦u(a)⊗v(b), which respects the tensor relations and differential. The tensor product of a right and a left chain complex is totalized by direct sums with the Koszul differential

External input

Use only the natural Moore Eilenberg–Zilber product comparison at source reference 0. The normalized comparison, degreewise splitting and preservation assertion are local arguments using [F2]–[F7].

Proof

Goal: Establish the statement under its stated hypotheses. Given: Simplicial sets and maps as in the Statement, with integral chain quasi-isomorphisms for f and g.

1.1F1F2F5F6F7constructalgebra

Apply [F1] directly to the Moore chains of T,V constructed in [F5]. Use the natural inclusions of [F2] for T,V,T×V. Tensoring a chain-homotopy equivalence with any complex remains a chain-homotopy equivalence: tensor its inverse as well, and for a homotopy h use h⊗1 in the first factor and a⊗b↦(−1)deg⁡aa⊗h(b) in the second. Expanding dH+Hd with [F7] cancels the cross terms and yields the tensored difference of maps, as required by [F6]. Thus the natural zigzag C(T×V)→M(T×V)→Tot⁡(M(T)⊗M(V))←Tot⁡(C(T)⊗C(V)) consists of chain-homotopy equivalences. Its comparison is natural in both maps, and proves the claimed normalized equivalence.

2.1A1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1constructalgebra∎

For a simplicial abelian group A, set pn,0=1 and pn,i+1=(1−sidi)pn,i for 0≤i<n. If djx=0 for j<i, then for j<i the identities in [F5] give dj(1−sidi)x=djx−si−1di−1djx=0; also di(1−sidi)x=0 since disi=1. Consequently pn,n maps into N(A)n and is the identity on it. The empty product is the identity for n=0. This is a linear retraction, so An=N(A)n⊕ker⁡pn,n, by x=pn,nx+(x−pn,nx). For A=Z[T] and likewise for T′,V,V′, [F5] makes the ambient term free; [A1] and [F4] therefore make every normalized term projective and flat. Apply [F3] first to C(f)⊗1C(V) and then to 1C(T′)⊗C(g), reindexed as stated. Both are quasi-isomorphisms; [F6] makes their composite B=Tot⁡(C(f)⊗C(g)) one. Let eT,V be the homology isomorphism from the zigzag in step 1.1, in any degree. Naturality gives eT′,V′H(C(f×g))=H(B)eT,V. Thus H(C(f×g))=eT′,V′−1H(B)eT,V is an isomorphism in every degree. Only nonnegative chains, finite total diagonals and the supplied bounded-above tensor assertion were used; no connectedness or finiteness hypothesis on the simplicial sets was imposed.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

J. F. Jardine, Lectures on Homotopy Theory, Lecture 09: Bisimplicial abelian groups · Section 26, Theorem 26.1 and proof, printed pp. 23–25 (zero-based PDF pages 22–24); Moore product comparison explicitly stated on printed p. 24

Natural inverse chain maps up to natural chain homotopies compare Moore chains of a product of simplicial sets with the tensor total of their Moore chains.

Hypotheses: Arbitrary simplicial sets; free integral Moore chains in nonnegative homological degrees; vertical differential has the horizontal-degree Koszul sign.

Reading limits: For this repair, read the author-hosted PDF extraction of §26, printed pp. 23–25, on 12 November 2026: grading, Theorem 26.1 and its proof, including the stated Moore product maps and homotopies. Import the Moore comparison as established input; its underlying Eilenberg–Zilber theorem is not reconstructed. Normalization and the application below are local compositions.

Sources