How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conjugacy in , Generation, and the Simplicity of — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Conjugating by an explicit permutation in
Example
Let and in . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and in .
Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry by the conjugating permutation (Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: ).
Permutations in are conjugate exactly when they have the same cycle type (Two elements of are conjugate if and only if they have the same cycle type).
Verification
The relabellings are and .
Apply [F1] to the two disjoint factors to obtain the displayed conjugate.
The result has one -cycle and one -cycle, hence the same cycle type as , as [F2] requires; conjugating back by recovers .
The five conjugacy classes of and the class equation
Example
The conjugacy data for are
| cycle type | representative | centralizer size | class size | parity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| even | ||||
| odd | ||||
| even | ||||
| even | ||||
| odd |
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric group .
A cycle type has centralizer size (If has cycles of length , then ).
-classes are indexed by the tuples with (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ), and over those tuples, the summand indexed by being the size of the corresponding class (The class equation of is ).
A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are included as -cycles (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles).
Verification
The five partitions of give exactly the five cycle types in the table.
Applying [F1] gives centralizer sizes ; dividing by them gives class sizes .
Their sum is , which verifies [F2].
Applying [F3] to the representatives gives the parity column.
The seven conjugacy classes of and their centralizer and class sizes
Example
The conjugacy data for are
| cycle type | centralizer size | class size | parity | splits in ? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| even | no | |||
| odd | -- | |||
| even | no | |||
| even | no | |||
| odd | -- | |||
| odd | -- | |||
| even | yes |
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric group .
A cycle type has centralizer size (If has cycles of length , then ).
-classes are indexed by the tuples with (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ), and over those tuples, the summand indexed by being the size of the corresponding class (The class equation of is ).
A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are included as -cycles (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles).
For and , the -class of splits into two -classes of equal size exactly when all cycle lengths in its decomposition, including -cycles for fixed points, are odd and no two are equal (For , an -class of an even permutation splits in exactly when all cycle lengths, including -cycles, are odd and distinct).
Verification
The seven partitions of give the seven rows. Applying [F1] gives the centralizer column, and [F2] gives the class-size column.
The sizes sum to , verifying the class equation.
Formula [F3] gives the parity column. Among the even rows, [F4] applies only to the single cycle of length , giving the final column.
The conjugacy classes of : sizes and the split -cycles
Example
The five conjugacy classes of have representatives and sizes
The last two classes are the two halves of the class of -cycles.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The alternating group .
-classes are indexed by the tuples with (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ); a permutation of type has centralizer cardinality (If has cycles of length , then ); and over those tuples, the summand indexed by being the size of the corresponding class (The class equation of is ).
A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are included as -cycles (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles).
For and , the -class of splits into two -classes of equal size exactly when all cycle lengths in its decomposition, including -cycles for fixed points, are odd and no two are equal (For , an -class of an even permutation splits in exactly when all cycle lengths, including -cycles, are odd and distinct).
Verification
By [F1] and [F2], the even types are , , , and , with symmetric class sizes .
By [F3], the first three stay single classes, while the -cycle class splits into two equal classes of size .
Put . The permutation satisfies and is odd by [F2]. Every other conjugator from to differs from by an element centralizing ; such a centralizer element is determined by the image of and is therefore a power of the even -cycle . Thus every conjugator is odd, so and lie in the two different halves from step 2.1.
The total agrees with [F4].
is a proper nontrivial normal subgroup of
Example
In , set Then is a proper nontrivial normal subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed subset .
is the kernel of sign (The alternating group of even permutations), and when fixed points are included as -cycles (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles).
Conjugation relabels every cycle entry (Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: ).
A subgroup is normal when it is invariant under conjugation (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).
Verification
Every displayed double transposition has two cycles and hence sign by [F1]. The product of two distinct nonidentity displayed elements is the third, and each is its own inverse; hence is a subgroup of .
By [F2], conjugation by any permutation relabels a double transposition to another double transposition. Thus is invariant under -conjugation, and [F3] makes it normal.
Its order is , strictly between and from [F4], so it is nontrivial and proper.
FALSE: two even permutations of the same cycle type are always conjugate in
Statement refuted
Two elements of with the same cycle type must be conjugate in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The cycles and in .
A -cycle has sign (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles), and is the kernel of sign (The alternating group of even permutations).
Conjugation relabels cycle entries (Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: ).
For and , the -class of splits into two -classes of equal size exactly when all cycle lengths in its decomposition, including -cycles for fixed points, are odd and no two are equal (For , an -class of an even permutation splits in exactly when all cycle lengths, including -cycles, are odd and distinct).
Counterexample
In , the cycles and have sign by [F1] and have the same cycle type .
The lengths and are odd and distinct, so [F3] says that the -class of -cycles splits into two -classes.
More explicitly, [F2] shows that conjugating to reverses the cyclic order on while fixing the remaining point; every such relabeling is odd. Hence no element of performs it.
Thus the two displayed even permutations have the same cycle type but are not conjugate in .
FALSE: is simple for every
Statement refuted
is simple for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The boundary case .
consists of the even permutations and has order (The alternating group of even permutations, is normal in ; for , , while for ); moreover when fixed points are included as -cycles (A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles).
Conjugation relabels cycle entries (Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: ).
Conjugation-invariant subgroups are normal (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation), while a simple group has no proper nontrivial normal subgroup (Simple groups).
The valid boundary is that is simple for every ( is simple for every ).
Counterexample
Each double transposition has two cycles and hence sign by [F1]. Thus lies in , and direct multiplication shows it is a subgroup of order .
By [F2], conjugation relabels a double transposition to another member of . Thus [F3] makes .
Since , is proper and nontrivial, so [F3] shows that is not simple.
This refutes the proposed lower bound ; [F4] records that is the correct one.
FALSE: any transposition together with any -cycle generates
Statement refuted
Every -cycle and every transposition together generate .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The elements and of .
Relative to , the neighboring transposition does generate with that cycle (For , and generate ).
A generated subgroup is the smallest subgroup containing its generators (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
Permutations act on the underlying set by composition (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
Counterexample
In , let and , and partition the symbols into and .
The cycle swaps and , while preserves each block. Therefore every word in preserves the two-block system setwise.
The permutation does not preserve that block system, so it is not in ; hence this generated subgroup is proper in .
Thus an arbitrary transposition need not work. The positive theorem [F1] requires a neighboring transposition relative to the chosen cycle.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.