Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Point evaluation is unbounded at the two-dimensional H1 threshold

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For any interior point c of the reference triangle, point evaluation u↦u(c) is not bounded on smooth functions equipped with the W1,2(S^2) norm. Thus the critical case ℓ=d/p=1 cannot be added to the supercritical point-evaluation conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An interior point c∈S^2 and the W1,2 norm convention of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms.

[F1]

The reference simplex is open, and smooth cutoffs supported in a prescribed open set and equal to one near a compact subset exist. (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization)

[F2]

A degree of freedom is a linear functional on its finite-element space; the point evaluation considered here is the candidate nodal functional at c. (Reference finite elements and unisolvent degrees of freedom)

[F3]

The Sobolev-space norm convention used for H1 assumes Countable Choice. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Choose R>0 with B(c,R)‾⊂S^2, and choose χ∈Cc∞(B(c,R)) equal to one on B(c,R/2). For 0<ϵ<R/4, put Lϵ=log⁡(R/ϵ) and uϵ(x)=χ(x) log⁡ ⁣(R/∣x−c∣2+ϵ2)Lϵ. This is smooth and compactly supported in the simplex, and uϵ(c)=1.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

In polar coordinates about c, r≥0 and the stated range 0<ϵ<R/4 gives r2+ϵ2≥ϵ2>0 and the radial derivative has no zero denominator. The undivided logarithm has uniformly bounded squared L2 integral on B(c,R): its absolute value is bounded by log⁡(R/r)+C for 0<r<R and small ϵ, and ∫0Rr(log⁡(R/r)+C)2dr<∞. Its radial derivative has magnitude r/(r2+ϵ2), so ∫0Rr3(r2+ϵ2)2 dr≤C+log⁡(R/ϵ)=C+Lϵ, by splitting at r=ϵ. After division by Lϵ, these estimates show the L2 norm and the gradient contribution from χ∇log⁡(R/r2+ϵ2) tend to zero. The term ∇χ is supported where R/2≤r<R, on which the logarithm is uniformly bounded; its divided L2 norm also tends to zero. Therefore ∥uϵ∥W1,2(S^2)→0.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1contradiction∎

If point evaluation at c were bounded, some finite C would satisfy ∣u(c)∣≤C∥u∥W1,2 for every smooth u. By [F2] this is the boundedness condition for the candidate nodal functional. Applying it to uϵ gives 1≤C∥uϵ∥W1,2→0, a contradiction. Hence evaluation is unbounded at the critical exponent.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources