Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Higher-dimensional simple symmetric walks are transient

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). For every integer d≥3, define the probability kernel on (Zd,2Zd) by Kd(z,A)=12d∑j=1d(δz+ej(A)+δz−ej(A)), where e1,…,ed are the standard basis vectors of Zd. For each x∈Zd, let Px be the canonical path-space chain law with initial measure δx and transition kernel Kd. Then every state x∈Zd is transient for this simple symmetric nearest-neighbor walk.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an integer d≥3, the lattice Zd, the kernel Kd, and a fixed initial state x∈Zd.

[A1]

AC is assumed for the canonical path-space law and the statewise recurrence criterion used below. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

A Dirac set function is a probability measure; finite nonnegative weighted sums of measures are measures. (A Dirac set function is a probability measure, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures)

[F2]

A probability kernel is a measure in the target variable for each source point, has total mass one, and is measurable in the source point for each measurable target set. (Measure kernel and probability kernel)

[F3]

From any probability measure and probability kernel, AC supplies a unique canonical path-space law whose coordinates form the corresponding homogeneous Markov chain. (Canonical Markov chain on path space)

[F4]

With initial measure δx, write Px for the specified deterministic-start chain law. (Initial distribution of a Markov chain)

[F5]

The simple symmetric walk has one-step matrix p(z,z+ej)=p(z,z−ej)=1/(2d) for j=1,…,d and zero elsewhere; each row sums to one. (Simple symmetric walk on the integer lattice)

[F6]

The matrix probabilities are p(z,w)=Kd(z,{w}) and p(n)(z,w)=Kdn(z,{w}), with p(0)(z,w)=1{z=w}. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)

[F7]

Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov holds: p(m+n)(z,w)=∑v∈Zdp(m)(z,v)p(n)(v,w). (Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations)

[F8]

Z is at most countable: it is a surjective image of N×N. (Q is countably infinite, Remark)

[F9]

Every finite power of an at most countable set is at most countable. (Every finite power of an at most countable set is at most countable)

[F10]

For a=(a1,…,ad)∈W(n,d), the multinomial coefficient counts ordered blocks of sizes a1,…,ad, and (na1,…,ad)∏j=1daj!=n!. The multinomial expansion holds for real variables. (The multinomial coefficient (nk0,…,km−1) as the number of ordered partitions of an n-set into blocks of prescribed sizes, The multinomial coefficient equals n!/∏i<mki!, and (x0+⋯+xm−1)n=∑ι ⁣(nk)∏i<mxiki in R)

[F11]

If positive reals uj have nonnegative real weights rj summing to one, then ∏jujrj≤∑jrjuj. (The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights)

[F12]

Stirling's formula gives m!2πm(m/e)m⟶1(m→∞). (Stirling's formula for factorials)

[F13]

For n≥1, if bn=4−n(2nn), then πn bn→1. (The central binomial coefficient is asymptotic to 4^n divided by the square root of pi n)

[F14]

Every nonempty finite subset of R has a maximum and minimum. (The nonempty finite subsets of R are exactly the listable ones)

[F15]

For rational s>1, the series ∑n≥1n−s converges. (For rational p>0, ∑1/kp converges iff p>1)

[F17]

For every specified chain law, Px(Tx+<∞)=1 means x is recurrent, while Px(Tx+<∞)<1 means it is transient; these alternatives exhaust all states. (Recurrent and transient states)

[F18]

Under AC, recurrence of a fixed state is equivalent to divergence of its return Green series: x recurrent⟺∑n=0∞p(n)(x,x)=∞. (Equivalent criteria for recurrence and transience)

Proof

technique · count return paths, estimate the maximum multinomial probability by Stirling's formula, and apply the Green-series criterion
1.1A1F3F6F17F18step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1given∎

For fixed z, Kd(z,⋅) is the finite weighted sum of the 2d Dirac probability measures at z±ej, 1≤j≤d, with coefficient 1/(2d). By [F1] it is a measure, and its total mass is 2d/(2d)=1. For fixed A⊆Zd, the function z↦Kd(z,A) is measurable because the source sigma-algebra is the full power set. Thus [F2] makes Kd a probability kernel. The vectors z±ej are pairwise distinct, so its transition matrix is exactly [F5]. [F1, F2, F5, given] 1.2 By [F3], [F4], and [A1], for each fixed x there is a canonical Markov chain law with this matrix and initial state x. Also [F8] and [F9] show that its state space Zd is at most countable, as required by [F18]. The law is unique for each x, so no family of laws is selected by choice. [A1, F3, F4, F8, F9, given] 1.3 Repeatedly apply [F7] to the finite-support one-step rows. Induction on the number of steps expands p(n)(0,0) as the sum of the probabilities of all length-n move words that start and end at 0; each such word has probability equal to the product of its one-step entries [F5]. At every finite time only finitely many words occur, since there are 2d choices at each step. In particular, a return after an odd number of steps is impossible: each move changes the parity of the sum of the coordinates. [F5, F6, F7, given] 1.4 Fix n≥1 and let Wn,d={a=(a1,…,ad)∈Nd:∑j=1daj=n}. For a∈Wn,d define qn(a)=d−n(na1,…,ad)=n!dn∏j=1daj!, where the second equality follows from [F10]. By the real multinomial expansion [F10], evaluating all d variables at 1/d gives ∑a∈Wn,dqn(a)=1. The index set is finite by [F10], and each qn(a)>0. [F10, given] 2.1 The maximum Mn:=max⁡a∈Wn,dqn(a) exists by [F10] and [F14]; the set is nonempty, for example (n,0,…,0) belongs to it. If ai≥aj+2 for coordinates 1≤i,j≤d, transferring one unit from coordinate i to coordinate j produces a′=a−ei+ej∈Wn,d and qn(a′)qn(a)=aiaj+1>1. Consequently any maximizing tuple has coordinates differing by at most one. Writing n=dm+r with 0≤r<d, such a tuple has r coordinates equal to m+1 and the others equal to m; all such tuples have the same value. [F10, F14, step 1.4, given] 2.2 A 2n-step word returns to zero exactly when, for each coordinate 1≤j≤d, it uses +ej and −ej equally often. Write their common count as aj; then a∈Wn,d. For fixed a, the number of words is the multinomial coefficient with the 2d category counts (a1,a1,…,ad,ad), so [F10] and [F5] give its return probability as (2n)!(2d)2n∏j=1d(aj!)2. Summing over a and using the definition of qn yields p(2n)(0,0)=bn∑a∈Wn,dqn(a)2,bn=4−n(2nn). Indeed, each summand on the right is 4−n(2n)!(n!)2(n!)2d2n∏j=1d(aj!)2=(2n)!(2d)2n∏j=1d(aj!)2, the word probability just computed. [F5, F7, F10, step 1.3, step 1.4, given, algebra] 3.1 The limit in [F12], and positivity of its terms for m≥1, imply constants c,C>0 such that for every integer m≥1, cm(m/e)m≤m!≤Cm(m/e)m. For fixed d and n≥2d, a balanced tuple has every coordinate aj≥n/(2d)>0. Put rj=aj/n for 1≤j≤d. These positive weights sum to one; applying weighted AM–GM [F11] to uj=1/(drj) gives ∏j=1d(1drj)rj≤∑j=1drjdrj=1, and raising to the nth power yields nndn∏j=1dajaj=∏j=1d(1drj)aj≤1. Use the upper Stirling bound for n! and the lower one for each aj! in the factorial formula for qn. Since ∑j=1daj=n, the exponential factors cancel, and the last display gives Mn≤Ccdn∏j=1daj≤Ccd(2d)d/2n−(d−1)/2. For 1≤n<2d, [F10] gives Mn≤1; increasing the constant therefore produces Cd>0 with Mn≤Cdn−(d−1)/2(n≥1). Here Cd may depend on the fixed dimension d. [F10, F11, F12, step 2.1, step 1.4, given, algebra] 4.1 Since 0≤qn(a)≤Mn, normalization [step 1.4] gives ∑a∈Wn,dqn(a)2≤Mn∑a∈Wn,dqn(a)=Mn. By [F13] there is a constant C0 with bn≤C0n−1/2 for all n≥1. Combining the return factorization, the bound from step 3.1, and the square-sum estimate just proved, there is a constant Dd>0 such that 0≤p(2n)(0,0)≤Ddn−d/2(n≥1). The odd-time return probabilities vanish by step 1.3. [F13, step 1.3, step 1.4, step 3.1, step 2.2, algebra] 5.1 For fixed integer d≥3, the rational exponent d/2 exceeds one, so [F15] gives convergence of ∑n≥1n−d/2. The comparison theorem [F16] and step 4.1 show that ∑n=0∞p(n)(0,0)=1+∑n=1∞p(2n)(0,0)<∞. The initial term is one by [F6]. [F6, F15, F16, step 1.3, step 4.1, algebra] 6.1 The Green-series criterion [F18] implies that 0 is not recurrent; [F17] gives the exhaustive recurrent/transient alternatives, so 0 is transient. For every x∈Zd, translation by x is a probability-preserving bijection from the finite move words from 0 back to 0 to the words from x back to x. Therefore p(n)(x,x)=p(n)(0,0) for every n, and the same finite Green-series criterion makes each x transient. [F5, F6, F17, F18, step 1.3, step 5.1, given] 7.1 The time-zero return contributes exactly one; all odd positive returns have probability zero; and the estimates apply at the threshold d=3, where the bounding exponent is 3/2. The constant Dd is allowed to depend on fixed d, so no uniform-in-d claim is made. AC [A1] is used for the canonical chain law and recurrence criterion; the path counting, finite maximization, and translation argument require no choice. The assertion is one-way, not an iff statement.

Source notes

Durrett, §5.4, Example 5.4.2 and the complete proof of Theorem 5.4.4, printed pp. 288–290 (official fifth-edition PDF at https://sites.math.duke.edu/~rtd/PTE/PTE5_011119.pdf). The theorem states the same transience classification. Its proof counts the d=3 return words, writes the return probability as a central-binomial factor times a sum of squared multinomial masses, bounds that sum by the largest mass, locates the maximum at balanced counts, and uses Stirling's formula for an O(n−1) maximum mass. It then handles d>3 using the embedded three-coordinate walk. The proof here extends the coefficient calculation to each fixed d≥3 by weighted AM–GM and the Stirling ratio, and applies the already authored statewise Green-series criterion. The source passage does not prove this all-d coefficient estimate, and no local central limit theorem is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources