How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Higher-dimensional simple symmetric walks are transient
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). For every integer , define the probability kernel on by where are the standard basis vectors of . For each , let be the canonical path-space chain law with initial measure and transition kernel . Then every state is transient for this simple symmetric nearest-neighbor walk.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an integer , the lattice , the kernel , and a fixed initial state .
AC is assumed for the canonical path-space law and the statewise recurrence criterion used below. (The Axiom of Choice)
A Dirac set function is a probability measure; finite nonnegative weighted sums of measures are measures. (A Dirac set function is a probability measure, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures)
A probability kernel is a measure in the target variable for each source point, has total mass one, and is measurable in the source point for each measurable target set. (Measure kernel and probability kernel)
From any probability measure and probability kernel, AC supplies a unique canonical path-space law whose coordinates form the corresponding homogeneous Markov chain. (Canonical Markov chain on path space)
With initial measure , write for the specified deterministic-start chain law. (Initial distribution of a Markov chain)
The simple symmetric walk has one-step matrix for and zero elsewhere; each row sums to one. (Simple symmetric walk on the integer lattice)
The matrix probabilities are and , with . (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)
Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov holds: (Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations)
is at most countable: it is a surjective image of . ( is countably infinite, Remark)
Every finite power of an at most countable set is at most countable. (Every finite power of an at most countable set is at most countable)
For , the multinomial coefficient counts ordered blocks of sizes , and The multinomial expansion holds for real variables. (The multinomial coefficient as the number of ordered partitions of an -set into blocks of prescribed sizes, The multinomial coefficient equals , and in )
If positive reals have nonnegative real weights summing to one, then . (The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights)
Stirling's formula gives (Stirling's formula for factorials)
Every nonempty finite subset of has a maximum and minimum. (The nonempty finite subsets of are exactly the listable ones)
For rational , the series converges. (For rational , converges iff )
If nonnegative terms are eventually bounded above by terms of a convergent series, their series converges. (If eventually, convergence of gives convergence of , and divergence of gives divergence of )
For every specified chain law, means is recurrent, while means it is transient; these alternatives exhaust all states. (Recurrent and transient states)
Under AC, recurrence of a fixed state is equivalent to divergence of its return Green series: (Equivalent criteria for recurrence and transience)
Proof
For fixed , is the finite weighted sum of the Dirac probability measures at , , with coefficient . By [F1] it is a measure, and its total mass is . For fixed , the function is measurable because the source sigma-algebra is the full power set. Thus [F2] makes a probability kernel. The vectors are pairwise distinct, so its transition matrix is exactly [F5]. [F1, F2, F5, given] 1.2 By [F3], [F4], and [A1], for each fixed there is a canonical Markov chain law with this matrix and initial state . Also [F8] and [F9] show that its state space is at most countable, as required by [F18]. The law is unique for each , so no family of laws is selected by choice. [A1, F3, F4, F8, F9, given] 1.3 Repeatedly apply [F7] to the finite-support one-step rows. Induction on the number of steps expands as the sum of the probabilities of all length- move words that start and end at ; each such word has probability equal to the product of its one-step entries [F5]. At every finite time only finitely many words occur, since there are choices at each step. In particular, a return after an odd number of steps is impossible: each move changes the parity of the sum of the coordinates. [F5, F6, F7, given] 1.4 Fix and let For define where the second equality follows from [F10]. By the real multinomial expansion [F10], evaluating all variables at gives The index set is finite by [F10], and each . [F10, given] 2.1 The maximum exists by [F10] and [F14]; the set is nonempty, for example belongs to it. If for coordinates , transferring one unit from coordinate to coordinate produces and Consequently any maximizing tuple has coordinates differing by at most one. Writing with , such a tuple has coordinates equal to and the others equal to ; all such tuples have the same value. [F10, F14, step 1.4, given] 2.2 A -step word returns to zero exactly when, for each coordinate , it uses and equally often. Write their common count as ; then . For fixed , the number of words is the multinomial coefficient with the category counts , so [F10] and [F5] give its return probability as Summing over and using the definition of yields Indeed, each summand on the right is the word probability just computed. [F5, F7, F10, step 1.3, step 1.4, given, algebra] 3.1 The limit in [F12], and positivity of its terms for , imply constants such that for every integer , For fixed and , a balanced tuple has every coordinate . Put for . These positive weights sum to one; applying weighted AM–GM [F11] to gives and raising to the th power yields Use the upper Stirling bound for and the lower one for each in the factorial formula for . Since , the exponential factors cancel, and the last display gives For , [F10] gives ; increasing the constant therefore produces with Here may depend on the fixed dimension . [F10, F11, F12, step 2.1, step 1.4, given, algebra] 4.1 Since , normalization [step 1.4] gives By [F13] there is a constant with for all . Combining the return factorization, the bound from step 3.1, and the square-sum estimate just proved, there is a constant such that The odd-time return probabilities vanish by step 1.3. [F13, step 1.3, step 1.4, step 3.1, step 2.2, algebra] 5.1 For fixed integer , the rational exponent exceeds one, so [F15] gives convergence of . The comparison theorem [F16] and step 4.1 show that The initial term is one by [F6]. [F6, F15, F16, step 1.3, step 4.1, algebra] 6.1 The Green-series criterion [F18] implies that is not recurrent; [F17] gives the exhaustive recurrent/transient alternatives, so is transient. For every , translation by is a probability-preserving bijection from the finite move words from back to to the words from back to . Therefore for every , and the same finite Green-series criterion makes each transient. [F5, F6, F17, F18, step 1.3, step 5.1, given] 7.1 The time-zero return contributes exactly one; all odd positive returns have probability zero; and the estimates apply at the threshold , where the bounding exponent is . The constant is allowed to depend on fixed , so no uniform-in-d claim is made. AC [A1] is used for the canonical chain law and recurrence criterion; the path counting, finite maximization, and translation argument require no choice. The assertion is one-way, not an iff statement.
Source notes
Durrett, §5.4, Example 5.4.2 and the complete proof of Theorem 5.4.4, printed pp. 288–290 (official fifth-edition PDF at https://sites.math.duke.edu/~rtd/PTE/PTE5_011119.pdf). The theorem states the same transience classification. Its proof counts the d=3 return words, writes the return probability as a central-binomial factor times a sum of squared multinomial masses, bounds that sum by the largest mass, locates the maximum at balanced counts, and uses Stirling's formula for an maximum mass. It then handles using the embedded three-coordinate walk. The proof here extends the coefficient calculation to each fixed by weighted AM–GM and the Stirling ratio, and applies the already authored statewise Green-series criterion. The source passage does not prove this all-d coefficient estimate, and no local central limit theorem is used.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Simple symmetric walk on the integer lattice
- Transition matrices and n-step probabilities
- Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- A measurable function between measurable spaces
- A Dirac set function is a probability measure
- Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures
- Canonical Markov chain on path space
- Initial distribution of a Markov chain
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is countably infinite
- Every finite power of an at most countable set is at most countable
- The nonempty finite subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ are exactly the listable ones
- Recurrent and transient states
- Equivalent criteria for recurrence and transience
- Stirling's formula for factorials
- The central binomial coefficient is asymptotic to 4^n divided by the square root of pi n
- The multinomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k_0,\dots,k_{m-1}}$ as the number of ordered partitions of an $n$-set into blocks of prescribed sizes
- The multinomial coefficient equals $n!/\prod_{i<m} k_i!$, and $(x_0+\dots+x_{m-1})^{n} = \sum \iota\!\binom{n}{k}\prod_{i<m} x_i^{k_i}$ in $\mathbb{R}$
- The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights
- For rational $p > 0$, $\sum 1/k^p$ converges iff $p > 1$
- If $0 \le a_k \le b_k$ eventually, convergence of $\sum b_k$ gives convergence of $\sum a_k$, and divergence of $\sum a_k$ gives divergence of $\sum b_k$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)