How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Energy weak solutions of incompressible Navier–Stokes
Definition
Assume Countable Choice, as in the Stokes-space conventions of Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms. Let be a nonempty bounded connected Lipschitz domain, , and fix and . Use and from Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms, the viscosity form , and the form from The skew convective form for incompressible flow. Set For and , an energy weak solution is a velocity , weakly continuous into , and a pressure with zero spatial mean a.e., such that a.e. and, for every vanishing near , It also satisfies, for almost every , No uniqueness is included in this definition. The formulation uses the real duality convention of Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives.
Depends on
Used by
- An energy Navier–Stokes velocity on the square without endpoint-integrable pressure Counterexample
- Solenoidal energy weak velocity for incompressible Navier–Stokes Definition
- The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme Definition
- Integrability of the energy weak Navier–Stokes formulation Lemma
- PE06 instantaneous pressure refutations and retained primitive estimates Remark
- First-order smooth pressure-primitive error for backward Euler MINI Theorem
- MINI backward Euler converges subsequentially to a solenoidal energy weak velocity Theorem
- Smooth-branch velocity error for backward Euler MINI Theorem
- Two-dimensional uniqueness and conditional three-dimensional weak–strong uniqueness Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Endre Süli and Tabea Tscherpel, Fully discrete finite element approximation of unsteady flows of implicitly constituted incompressible fluids, arXiv:1804.02264v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Xiaoming He, Introduction and Basic Implementation for Finite Element Methods, Chapter 9: Finite elements for 2D unsteady Navier–Stokes equations (standard reference, not scraped)