How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function
Definition
Let be a plane domain and let be subharmonic on (Subharmonic functions on plane domains); in particular is not identically on any component. Then (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable), so for every compactly supported smooth test function the Lebesgue integral converges absolutely: the support of is compact and is bounded, so . The distributional Riesz functional of is
where is the Laplacian, is area Lebesgue measure, and is the test space of Distribution with the distributional derivative conventions of Distributional derivative. The value is complex in general and is real for real-valued test functions. The functional depends only on the almost-everywhere representative of : if a.e. then a.e. for every test function, so the integrals agree. Linearity in is inherited from the linearity of differentiation and integration.
The normalization factor is chosen so that, under Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), a logarithmic point potential has unit mass at its pole: in the distributional sense, that is, (The negative Laplacian of the fundamental solution is the unit Dirac distribution).
Remarks
What is and is not asserted here. The assignment is defined as a functional on test functions. That it is continuous for the test-function topology, that it is positive on nonnegative test functions, and that it is consequently integration against a unique positive Radon measure are not part of this definition; they are proved under Dependent Choice in The distributional Riesz functional of a subharmonic function is a positive Radon measure ↗, which is the well-definedness statement for the name "Riesz measure".
Sign and coefficient conventions. With the present sign convention a subharmonic function has a positive Riesz measure: for the model under Countable Choice one has by the normalization above, and for a compactly supported logarithmic potential one has (Distributional Laplacian of a compact logarithmic potential).
Choice. Defining the functional uses no choice principle: the integral is a Lebesgue integral of an element of against a fixed smooth test function. The logarithmic point-mass comparison above invokes the published fundamental-solution theorem under its stated Countable Choice hypothesis. The positive Radon measure interpretation invokes Dependent Choice for the representation and uniqueness in the well-definedness theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- Riesz measure of a log modulus records the holomorphic zeros Example
- Distributional Laplacian of a compact logarithmic potential Lemma
- Local Riesz decomposition of a plane subharmonic function Theorem
- The distributional Riesz functional of a subharmonic function is a positive Radon measure Theorem
- The principle of descent and the logarithmic domination principle Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Khoruzhenko, LTCC Potential Theory notes (standard reference, not scraped)