Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Distributional Laplacian of a compact logarithmic potential

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let μ be a finite positive Borel measure on C with compact support S=supp⁡μ, and let pμ(z)=∫Clog⁡∣z−w∣ dμ(w)∈[−∞,∞) and Uμ=−pμ be as in Logarithmic potential and energy of a positive compactly supported measure. Then pμ is locally integrable on C, subharmonic on the domain C, harmonic on C∖S, and

Δpμ=2πμ,equivalentlyΔUμ=−2πμ,

in the distributional sense, that is, 12π∫Cpμ Δφ dA=∫Cφ dμ for every φ∈Cc∞(C); in the normalization of Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function this reads μpμ=μ.

The zero measure is included and is settled separately: then S=∅ and p0=0 by the zero clause of Logarithmic potential and energy of a positive compactly supported measure, the constant 0 is smooth, subharmonic and harmonic on C=C∖S, Δ0=0=2π⋅0 distributionally and μp0=0. The proof below therefore assumes S≠∅; for a nonzero finite positive Borel measure this holds because S=supp⁡μ carries μ, so a measure with empty support is zero (Support of a finite Borel measure on the plane).

The Axiom of Countable Choice is used through the published fundamental-solution theorem [F6] and through the countable constructions in [F4]; the pointwise, Fubini and Fatou steps are choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a finite positive Borel measure μ with compact support S≠∅ (the zero measure is excluded by the Statement), the potentials pμ=−Uμ of Logarithmic potential and energy of a positive compactly supported measure, and ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

pμ(z)=∫log⁡∣z−w∣ dμ(w) is the extended integral of the Borel function log⁡∣z−⋅∣ against the finite measure μ, and pμ(z)∈[−∞,∞) (Logarithmic potential and energy of a positive compactly supported measure).

[F2]

For every w∈C the function z↦log⁡∣z−w∣ is subharmonic on the whole plane: apply the zero-order factorization theorem to the holomorphic function z↦z−w, which is not identically zero (The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic).

[F3]

z↦log⁡∣z−a∣ is smooth and harmonic on C∖{a} (Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre).

[F4]

Every subharmonic function on a plane domain is locally integrable (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).

[F5]

Subharmonic on a plane domain means upper semicontinuous, not identically −∞ on any connected component, and satisfying the circle mean inequality at every closed disc contained in the domain (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[F6]

Assume ACω: the kernel Φ(x)=−(2π)−1log⁡∣x∣ is locally integrable on R2 and its regular distribution satisfies −ΔTΦ=δ0; for every y the translate satisfies −ΔxTΦ(⋅−y)=δy (The negative Laplacian of the fundamental solution is the unit Dirac distribution).

[F7]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative product-measurable integrands (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F8]

Fubini's theorem for product-integrable integrands (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F9]

Fatou's lemma: for nonnegative measurable fn, ∫lim inf⁡nfn≤lim inf⁡n∫fn (Fatou's lemma).

[F10]

Differentiation under the integral sign for a parameter integral with an integrable dominating function (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F11]

The support supp⁡μ of a finite positive Borel measure on C carries μ and is the smallest closed carrier; in particular μ≠0 if and only if supp⁡μ≠∅, and if μ is carried by a compact K then supp⁡μ⊆K is compact (Support of a finite Borel measure on the plane).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F7F11givenalgebra

By [F11] the support S≠∅ is compact. Fix R>0 and put S0:=max⁡w∈S∣w∣<∞. For z∈B(0,R) one has log⁡∣z−w∣≤log⁡(R+S0), so pμ+(z)≤Mlog⁡+(R+S0)<∞, where M=μ(C). Also pμ−(z)≤∫log⁡+(1/∣z−w∣) dμ(w). Tonelli and the radial computation ∫∣u∣<1log⁡(1/∣u∣) dA(u)=2π∫01rlog⁡(1/r) dr=π/2 give ∫B(0,R)pμ−(z) dA(z)≤M∫∣u∣<1log⁡(1/∣u∣) dA(u)=πM/2<∞. Thus pμ−<∞ outside an area-null subset of B(0,R) and pμ∈(−∞,∞) almost everywhere; in particular pμ is not identically −∞ on the connected domain C.

1.2F1F9algebra

Let zn→z and choose C with log⁡∣zn−w∣≤C for all w∈S and all n; the functions hn(w):=C−log⁡∣zn−w∣ are nonnegative and measurable, so [F9] gives lim inf⁡n∫hn dμ≥∫lim inf⁡nhn dμ, that is, lim sup⁡npμ(zn)≤∫lim sup⁡nlog⁡∣zn−w∣ dμ(w)=pμ(z), because log⁡∣zn−w∣→log⁡∣z−w∣ for w≠z and →−∞ for w=z. Hence pμ is upper semicontinuous.

1.3F2F5given

For every w∈C the function z↦log⁡∣z−w∣ is subharmonic by [F2] applied to the holomorphic function z↦z−w; by [F5] it therefore satisfies the circle mean inequality log⁡∣a−w∣≤12π∫02πlog⁡∣a+reit−w∣ dt for all a∈C and r>0.

2.1step 1.3F1F7algebra

Fix a∈C, r>0 and put G(t,w):=log⁡∣a+reit−w∣; since G+≤log⁡(∣a∣+r+S0+1) on S, the extended integral ∫02π∫SG dμ dt and its reversed iterated integral both equal ∫G+−∫G− by two applications of [F7], the difference being well defined because ∫∫G+<∞. Integrating the inequality of step 1.3 over μ and using this identity gives pμ(a)≤12π∫02π∫SG dμ dt=12π∫02πpμ(a+reit) dt.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1F4F5

By step 1.2 pμ is upper semicontinuous, by step 1.1 it is not identically −∞ on C, and by step 2.1 it satisfies the circle mean inequality at every closed disc in C; each disc lies in some B(0,R) and the inequality of step 2.1 is exactly the one required by [F5], so pμ is subharmonic on C, and [F4] makes it locally integrable.

4.1step 3.1F3F10algebra

Let z0∉S and δ:=12d(z0,S)>0. On B(z0,δ) every w∈S satisfies ∣z−w∣≥δ, so every partial derivative of order 1 or 2 in z of (z,w)↦log⁡∣z−w∣ is bounded on B(z0,δ)×S by a constant depending only on δ; since μ is finite, [F10] applied to x and y derivatives lets the Laplacian pass inside the integral, and [F3] gives Δpμ(z)=∫Δzlog⁡∣z−w∣ dμ(w)=0 for z∈B(z0,δ). The resulting first and second derivatives are continuous by Dominated convergence, since the kernel derivatives are continuous away from the uniformly separated support and obey the same integrable constant bounds. Hence pμ is harmonic on the open set C∖S.

5.1step 3.1F6F8given∎

Let φ∈Cc∞(C). If φ=0 the identity is immediate; otherwise take a nonempty compact set L containing supp⁡φ and choose A>max⁡{∣z−w∣:z∈L, w∈S}. Then ∫L∣log⁡∣z−w∣∣ dA(z)≤∫∣u∣<A∣log⁡∣u∣∣ dA(u)<∞ uniformly for w∈S. Since Δφ is bounded on L, the integrand log⁡∣z−w∣Δφ(z) is product-integrable on L×S, and [F8] gives ∫pμΔφ dA=∫(∫log⁡∣z−w∣Δφ(z) dA(z))dμ(w). The inner integral is the distributional pairing ⟨Δxlog⁡∣x−w∣,φ⟩, which by [F6] equals 2πφ(w); hence 12π∫pμΔφ dA=∫φ dμ for every test function, that is, μpμ=μ in the normalization of Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function, equivalently Δpμ=2πμ and ΔUμ=−Δpμ=−2πμ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources