Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Riesz decomposition of a plane subharmonic function

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice. Let Ω⊆C be a complex domain, let u be subharmonic on Ω in the sense of Subharmonic functions on plane domains, and let D⊆Ω be open with D‾ compact and D‾⊆Ω. Let μu=(2π)−1Δu be the Riesz measure of Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function and let M be the restriction μu∣D of Restriction of a measure to a measurable set, extended by zero to C: explicitly, M(A):=μu(A∩D) for A∈B(C). Then M is a finite positive Borel measure carried by D, and there is a function h harmonic on D with

u(z)=h(z)+∫Clog⁡∣z−w∣ dM(w)for every z∈D,

the integral ∫log⁡∣z−w∣ dM(w) being an element of [−∞,+∞) whose value −∞ is allowed. Moreover the pair is unique: if M′ is a finite positive Borel measure carried by D and h′ is harmonic on D with u(z)=h′(z)+∫Clog⁡∣z−w∣ dM′(w) for every z∈D, then M′=M and h′=h.

Dependent Choice is used by the positive Radon representation and uniqueness supplier [F4]. It also supplies Countable Choice for the potential, regularity, Weyl, distribution-embedding and polar-coordinate suppliers [F5]–[F7], [F10] and [F13], and for the selection of radii in step 8.1. The potential and averaging estimates themselves are choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a complex domain Ω, a subharmonic u:Ω→[−∞,∞) on Ω, the Riesz functional μu of Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function, an open D with D‾ compact and D‾⊆Ω, and Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F1]

A function v:Ω→[−∞,∞) on a complex domain is subharmonic when it is upper semicontinuous, is not identically −∞ on any component, and satisfies the circle mean inequality v(a)≤(2π)−1∫02πv(a+reit) dt for every closed disc D(a,r)‾⊆Ω (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[F2]

The Riesz functional is μu(φ)=(2π)−1∫Ωu Δφ dA for φ∈Cc∞(Ω), real when φ is real-valued and complex in general; equivalently ΔTu=2πμu, where Tu is the regular distribution of u (Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function).

[F3]

Dependent Choice implies Countable Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, Dependent choice implies countable choice), which discharges the choice hypotheses of [F5], [F6], [F7], [F10] and [F13].

[F4]

Under Dependent Choice, μu is a positive Radon measure on Ω (The distributional Riesz functional of a subharmonic function is a positive Radon measure).

[F5]

Assume Countable Choice and let ρ be a finite positive Borel measure of compact support on C. Then pρ(z)=∫log⁡∣z−w∣ dρ(w), with the diagonal value −∞, is locally integrable and subharmonic on C, and Δpρ=2πρ distributionally, that is, (2π)−1∫pρΔφ dA=∫φ dρ for every φ∈Cc∞(C) (Distributional Laplacian of a compact logarithmic potential).

[F6]

Under Countable Choice the map f↦Tf from Lloc1 modulo almost-everywhere equality into distributions is injective (Locally integrable functions embed in distributions, Locally integrable functions as regular distributions); and for g∈C2 on an open set one has ΔTg=TΔg, while differentiation is linear on distributions (Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes).

[F7]

Assume Countable Choice: if T∈D′(D) with ΔT=0, there is a unique smooth harmonic h on D with T=Th (Weyl's lemma for the Laplacian).

[F8]

A finite nonnegative linear combination of subharmonic functions on a domain is subharmonic, in particular the sum of two of them; a C2 function with Δg≥0 is subharmonic, and a harmonic function is C2 with Δh=0, hence subharmonic (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity, A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative, Plane harmonic functions).

[F9]

Every subharmonic function on a plane domain is locally integrable (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).

[F10]

The polar-coordinate formula (under Countable Choice) and Tonelli's theorem give, for a Borel function f≥0 and a disc B(a,R), ∫B(a,R)f dA=∫0Rr∫02πf(a+reit) dt dr (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F11]

A Radon measure on an LCH space is finite on compact sets (Radon measure on an LCH space), and restriction to a Borel set defines a measure on the ambient sigma-algebra (Restriction of a measure to a measurable set). Its zero extension here is M(A)=μu(A∩D) for A∈B(C); A∩D is Borel in Ω, disjoint countable unions stay disjoint under intersection with D, and hence countable additivity passes to M. Thus M is a Borel measure on C carried by D.

[F12]

Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected); in particular every component of the open set D is a complex domain and satisfies D0‾⊆D‾⊆Ω.

[F13]

Assume Countable Choice: every Borel measure on a second-countable LCH space that is finite on compact sets is regular, that is, Radon in the sense of Radon measure on an LCH space (Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F4F11given

Since D‾ is compact and contained in Ω, [F4] and [F11] give μu(D‾)<+∞; hence the restriction M=μu∣D is a finite positive Borel measure carried by D‾⊆Ω, and in particular carried by D.

1.2F1F12

Let D0 be a connected component of D, let v be subharmonic on the complex domain D0, and let a∈D0. Then v(a)≤Ar(v)(a) for every r with D(a,r)‾⊆D0 by [F1]. For every real N>v(a), upper semicontinuity gives v≤N on D(a,δ)‾⊆D0 for some δ>0, hence Ar(v)(a)≤N for 0<r≤δ. Thus lim⁡r↓0Ar(v)(a)=v(a), including v(a)=−∞, when every real N works.

1.3F3given

By [F3] Dependent Choice yields Countable Choice, so the choice hypotheses of the suppliers [F5], [F6], [F7], [F10] and [F13] are discharged for the whole argument.

2.1step 1.1F5

Put p:=pM=∫log⁡∣z−w∣ dM(w) with the diagonal value −∞; by [F5] (with ρ=M) the function p is locally integrable and subharmonic on C and satisfies Δp=2πM distributionally, that is, (2π)−1∫pΔφ dA=∫φ dM for every φ∈Cc∞(C).

2.2step 1.1F2F4F5F6given

For uniqueness of the measure let M′ be a finite positive Borel measure carried by D and h′ harmonic on D with u=h′+pM′ pointwise on D, and set p′:=pM′, locally integrable and subharmonic with Δp′=2πM′ by [F5]. For every φ∈Cc∞(D), [F2], [F5], [F6] and the representation clause of [F4] give 2π∫φ dM′=∫p′Δφ dA=⟨ΔTp′,φ⟩=⟨ΔTh′+p′,φ⟩=⟨ΔTu,φ⟩=2πμu(φ)=2π∫φ dM, so M and M′ define the same functional Φ(φ):=∫φ dM on Cc∞(D).

3.1step 2.1F2F6F9

Let Tu and Tp be the regular distributions of the locally integrable functions u and p. For every φ∈Cc∞(D) one has ⟨ΔTu,φ⟩=Tu(Δφ)=∫ΩuΔφ dA=2πμu(φ)=2π∫Ωφ dμu=2π∫Ωφ dM=∫ΩpΔφ dA=⟨ΔTp,φ⟩, where the third equality is [F2], the fifth uses that φ is supported in D and M=μu∣D, and the sixth is step 2.1 and [F6]; hence Δ(Tu−Tp)=0 in D′(D).

3.2step 1.3step 2.2F4F5F12F13

Now let D0 be a connected component of the open set D; by [F12] it is open, hence a complex domain, contained in Ω with D0‾⊆D‾⊆Ω compact, and q:=p′∣D0 is subharmonic on D0 with Riesz functional φ↦(2π)−1∫D0q Δφ dA=∫φ dM′ for every φ∈Cc∞(D0) by [F5]. Both M′∣D0 and M∣D0 are finite Borel measures on the second-countable LCH space D0, hence Radon by [F13] under the Countable Choice of step 1.3, and M∣D0 represents the same functional because ∫φ d(M∣D0)=Φ(φ)=(2π)−1∫D0q Δφ dA for every φ∈Cc∞(D0) by step 2.2; the uniqueness clause of [F4] applied on the domain D0 therefore gives M′∣D0=M∣D0. Since D is second countable and its components are pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets, each containing a member of a countable base, there are at most countably many components; they partition D, so countable additivity gives M′=M on every Borel subset of D, and both measures are carried by D, hence M′=M on B(C).

4.1step 3.1F7

By [F7] applied to the distribution T:=(Tu−Tp)∣D∈D′(D) of step 3.1, there is a unique smooth harmonic h on D with T=Th, that is, ⟨Tu−Tp,φ⟩=∫Dhφ dA for every φ∈Cc∞(D).

5.1step 2.1step 4.1F6F9

The function u−p is locally integrable on D by [F9] and step 2.1, and h is locally integrable; step 4.1 says that their regular distributions agree. By the injectivity of [F6], u−p=h almost everywhere on D.

6.1step 2.1step 5.1F1F8F9F12

On each connected component D0 of D, the function g:=h+p is subharmonic: h∣D0 is harmonic and hence subharmonic by [F8], and p∣D0 inherits upper semicontinuity and the circle inequality from step 2.1 and cannot be identically −∞ because it is locally integrable. The sum is subharmonic by [F8]. Likewise u∣D0 is subharmonic by [F1] and its local integrability [F9]. Step 5.1 gives u=g almost everywhere on D.

7.1step 6.1F9F10

For fixed a∈D choose R>0 with D(a,R)‾⊆D. By step 2.1 and [F9], u,g∈Lloc1(D). Replace their values −∞ by 0 to obtain finite Borel representatives u~,g~; they agree with u,g almost everywhere and satisfy u~=g~ almost everywhere by step 6.1. Thus q:=∣u~−g~∣ is a nonnegative Borel function with q=0 almost everywhere. Applying [F10] to q+∣u~∣+∣g~∣ on B(a,R) shows that for almost every r∈(0,R) the restrictions of u~,g~ to the circle are integrable and agree almost everywhere in angle. Since the representatives differ from the subharmonic functions only on planar null sets, [F10] also makes those exceptional sets arclength-null for almost every r. Hence Ar(u)(a)=Ar(g)(a) for almost every r∈(0,R), where Ar(v)(a):=(2π)−1∫02πv(a+reit) dt.

8.1step 7.1step 1.2F3

Let S⊆(0,R) be the full-measure set of radii from step 7.1 for which the circle means agree. Each S∩(0,min⁡(R/2,1/(n+1))) is nonempty, so Countable Choice [F3] gives rn∈S∩(0,min⁡(R/2,1/(n+1))) for every n; then rn→0. By step 1.2, applied to the subharmonic functions u and g at a, u(a)=lim⁡nArn(u)(a)=lim⁡nArn(g)(a)=g(a). Since a∈D was arbitrary, u=h+p everywhere on D, which is the asserted decomposition.

9.1step 2.1step 8.1step 3.2F6F9∎

With M′=M from step 3.2 we have h′+p=h+p everywhere on D by the decomposition of step 8.1, and p is finite almost everywhere because p∈Lloc1(D) by step 2.1; hence h′=h almost everywhere on D. The difference h′−h is harmonic, hence continuous, on the open set D, and an almost-everywhere-vanishing continuous function on D vanishes everywhere, since a set of full measure in a nonempty open set is dense; therefore h′=h, and the decomposition is unique in both entries.

Remarks

The integral is finite or −∞, never +∞. On the compact carrier of M the integrand log⁡∣z−w∣ is bounded above, so the integral converges in the extended sense with value in [−∞,+∞); the value −∞ occurs exactly when the negative part of the kernel is not M-integrable at z, and at such a point the decomposition forces u(z)=−∞.

The kernel normalization is what makes h unique. The measure in the decomposition is the restriction of the normalized Riesz measure μu=(2π)−1Δu of Distributional Riesz measure of a plane subharmonic function; the factor 2π is the same one that makes Δlog⁡∣z−a∣=2πδa, so the potential ∫log⁡∣z−w∣ dM(w) has distributional Laplacian exactly 2πM.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources