How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symmetric interior-penalty DG form and energy seminorm
Definition
Assume Countable Choice for the Sobolev notation below. Each cell is the closed simplex from Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity; in notation, means its open interior, and its facets are the boundary faces of that interior. Write for . Use the mesh and jump convention of Jump and average conventions for symmetric interior-penalty DG. Specialize Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh to scalar real polynomials of a fixed degree , so . On every cell , let be a constant symmetric matrix. Assume common bounds such that Write , let , and fix a penalty parameter . Define to consist of broken real-valued functions with , distributional , and an one-sided normal coefficient-flux trace on every facet of each cell . Precisely, is the unique function satisfying Here is the value trace from Sobolev traces and Gauss–Green formula on physical simplices; uniqueness follows by testing smooth functions supported near the relative interior of each facet, whose restrictions are dense in . If and points outward from , set ; on a boundary facet set with the outward normal. These definitions agree with whenever the classical one-sided vector flux traces exist. Broken polynomials and cellwise functions belong to by Sobolev traces and Gauss–Green formula on physical simplices. For , define All facet integrals and norms use -dimensional surface measure for the stated mesh dimension . Counting measure is reserved for the separate one-dimensional interval examples in Jump and average conventions for symmetric interior-penalty DG. The expression is real and symmetric.
Define the energy expression and its augmented version on by The first expression is initially a seminorm on ; its definiteness is not part of this definition. The stated Sobolev notation follows Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Cellwise functions have the required value and normal coefficient-flux traces by Sobolev traces and Gauss–Green formula on physical simplices, because is constant. The augmented expression is defined whenever , so it applies in particular to the exact functions, dual functions and discrete polynomials used below.
For define the discrete load . A symmetric interior-penalty DG solution is a function satisfying for every .
Depends on
- Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity
- Jump and average conventions for symmetric interior-penalty DG
- Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Sobolev traces and Gauss–Green formula on physical simplices
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- Boundedness of the SIPDG form in the augmented norm Lemma
- Discrete inverse-trace bound for SIPDG coefficient fluxes Lemma
- SIPDG adjoint consistency for piecewise H2 dual solutions Lemma
- The SIPDG broken energy expression is definite Lemma
- A direct Strang-type energy error estimate for SIPDG Theorem
- Exact consistency of the symmetric interior-penalty DG form Theorem
- SIPDG coercivity above the discrete inverse-trace threshold Theorem
- SIPDG L2 error under adjoint consistency and dual approximation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part VIII, Chapter 38: Discontinuous Galerkin (standard reference, not scraped)
- Douglas N. Arnold, Franco Brezzi, Bernardo Cockburn, and L. Donatella Marini, Unified Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 39(5) (2002) (standard reference, not scraped)