How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The complete weight-one decomposition matrix for S3 at p=3
Example
Take and the weight-one configuration , of The e-core, the e-quotient, and the e-weight; the three partitions of with -core are (The e-core, the e-quotient, and the e-weight). The associated q-Schur weight-one class over a field of characteristic with and has the complete Weyl/simple decomposition matrix, with rows and columns in the order , equal to Applying the Schur functor and the conjugation/duality dictionary gives the Murphy Specht rows , , , which in the page's -regular labels is the matrix with rows (Nakayama block classification for symmetric groups, Modular simple modules of the symmetric group); the group-side entries are verified directly from the two-dimensional model of characteristic , whose all-ones vector spans a trivial submodule with sign quotient, together with and .
No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime , the partitions , , of , and the Weyl modules of for over any field of characteristic , with and quantum characteristic (for example ).
-cores: the -core of a partition is computed by removing rim -hooks until none remains; , , , and these are all the partitions of with core , ordered by dominance as (The e-core, the e-quotient, and the e-weight, The e-core is independent of the rim hook removal order).
The balanced positive Jantzen-submodule formula is The q-Schaper virtual radical-layer formula and its beta signs are Virtual Weyl and Specht symbols attached to beta sequences. Every Weyl module has its nonzero norm-one simple head and , with absolute simple heads and base-change-compatible forms (The type-A q-Schur algebra and its Weyl modules). The specific three-row computation is proved below.
The exact integral Schur corner/form/radical identity is The Schur functor sends Weyl and simple modules to Specht and Hecke simple modules, steps 1.1–5.1. The specific Murphy forms/actions are computed locally from the independent integral Murphy datum and row action (The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form, The row permutation module: distinguished basis and Hecke action). The signed conjugate module/form identity is Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells. No universal finite- restricted nonzero criterion is used.
Group side: the simple -modules at are and , indexed by the -regular partitions (Nakayama block classification for symmetric groups, Modular simple modules of the symmetric group).
Tabloid model: the permutation module over a field has the three tabloids as a basis, where is the tabloid whose singleton second row is , and ; the Specht module has basis and . Moreover is the trivial module and is the sign module The characteristic- constructions use Integral Specht lattice and base change; their basis and actions are verified in step 4.1. The James form quotient is Modular Specht form and radical quotient.
Verification
The labels and their cores. The hook-length diagrams of the three partitions of are for ; in the first row and in the second for ; and vertically for . In each case there is exactly one hook of length and removing its rim hook leaves the empty partition, so all three partitions have -core ; conversely any partition of with core is one of these, since a partition whose core has size is its own core, and has size . Dominance orders them as .
Compute the Weyl matrix directly. First work over with lift , , so the only nonzero hook valuation at rank three is . The conjugate beta sequence of is . Its hook pairs and give the balanced sequences and , of sorted shapes with sign and with sign , respectively. The other pair has coefficient zero. Thus its positive sum is . For , beta and its only nonzero pair give , shape with sign , so its positive sum is . The column shape has no row pair and zero positive sum, hence . Positivity and then show that and every higher submodule is zero, giving . Substitute into the first sum to get ; the same argument gives . This proves exactly the displayed complete Weyl matrix. Scalar extension to any original field of characteristic three preserves the Weyl modules/forms and the composition series, since all Schur simple heads are absolutely simple by [F2].
Determine the specific corner images directly. The group row symmetrizer satisfies , so its rank-one Murphy form is zero in characteristic three. In the rank-one column cell the generator is and its square coefficient is ; the higher ideal contains and (the latter is a conjugate of the former), so this cell and its nonzero form quotient are the sign module. For the middle cell put , and modulo the higher row ideal. Its row symmetrizer satisfies , so while ; and gives , . Thus its generator matrices are and . The independent cell products , and give over . Its radical is the line ; modulo it both generators act by , so is the nonzero trivial module. These two simple images are distinct since . The exact corner/form identity [F3] therefore kills precisely among the three labels. Projecting the Weyl matrix just proved gives all displayed Murphy Specht rows over the original , without any general finite- nonzero-label criterion.
Dipper-James rows and the direct group computation. Conjugating the partitions , and applying the signed -pullback to every Hecke module, the rows of step 3.1 become , and in the -regular labels, that is, the matrix with rows and columns . For the independent direct check, construct the tabloid module over using [F5]. Every middle-shape polytabloid is a difference , and these span the two independent vectors displayed in [F5], so they are a basis of . A one-row polytabloid is its unique tabloid, giving the trivial module; a one-column polytabloid is the nonzero alternating sum of all six distinct tabloids, giving the sign module. Put in characteristic : then spans a one-dimensional submodule, since gives for every , so it realises the trivial module; and in the quotient, shows that acts by . All transpositions are conjugate and act on a one-dimensional quotient, so they all act by and the quotient is sign. The orthonormal tabloid form has middle Gram matrix in ; its characteristic-three kernel is . Thus the James quotient is precisely this sign quotient, while the row form has norm and is trivial. With , by [F5], and the just-computed , (the complete list is [F4]), the direct rows of are , matching the matrix obtained from the Schur functor entry by entry.
Depends on
- The q-Schaper virtual radical-layer formula
- The type-A q-Schur algebra and its Weyl modules
- Virtual Weyl and Specht symbols attached to beta sequences
- The Schur functor sends Weyl and simple modules to Specht and Hecke simple modules
- The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form
- The row permutation module: distinguished basis and Hecke action
- Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells
- Nakayama block classification for symmetric groups
- The e-core, the e-quotient, and the e-weight
- Modular simple modules of the symmetric group
- Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules
- Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules
- The e-core is independent of the rim hook removal order
- Integral Specht lattice and base change
- Modular Specht form and radical quotient
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete 79-page prepublication manuscript (1998; expanded AMS University Lecture Series 15 edition, 1999) (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 682, Springer 1978 (complete author-hosted scan, 161 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)