How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The set of binary sequences is equinumerous with , hence uncountable
Example
Let be the set of all functions , where and (The set of all functions , The unordered pair and the singleton ). The map sending to its characteristic function, for and for , is a bijection (The power set , Injection, surjection, bijection). Hence (Equinumerous sets, and ) and the set of binary sequences is uncountable (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable, is uncountable). This is the function-space form of Cantor's diagonal argument, and it is the form in which the library records that infinite products of at-most-countable sets need not be at most countable. No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The von Neumann naturals with and (The natural numbers (von Neumann)), the unordered pair (The unordered pair and the singleton ), and the set of functions (The set of all functions , For sets and the collection of all functions is a set, being a subset of ). Membership in is membership in : exactly when or .
, since and for every (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).
Separation and set notation: for a set and a property, is the set of elements of with that property (The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula , ); means every element of is an element of , and (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation , The power set ).
A function is a relation with a unique value at each point of its domain; means and ; and two functions with the same domain and the same values are equal (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain, The Axiom of Extensionality: ). Ordered pairs are those of the Cartesian product (The Cartesian product ).
Injection, surjection, bijection; images and preimages (Injection, surjection, bijection, The image and the preimage of a set under a relation).
means a bijection exists; is symmetric and transitive (Equinumerous sets, and ); is finite when for some , countably infinite when , at most countable when it is one of the two, and uncountable when it is not at most countable (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
is uncountable ( is uncountable).
Verification
For the set exists by Separation, and it is a function with for and for . Indeed, for each exactly one of , holds, so exactly one value is related to , namely in the first case and in the second; and by the definition of the unordered pair.
The assignment is injective. If as sets of ordered pairs, then for every one has iff iff iff : the outer equivalences are step 1.1, and in the middle, a function value that is not is , which differs from by [F1], so holds exactly when , that is exactly when . Hence by Extensionality of sets.
The assignment is surjective. Let and put , a subset of by Separation. For each , either or because ; in the first case and step 1.1 gives , and in the second case and . Thus and have the same domain and the same values, so they are equal by [F3], and is in the image of the assignment.
By steps 2.1 and 2.2 the characteristic-function map is a bijection , so by [F5].
The set is uncountable. If it were at most countable, then for some or by [F5]; symmetry and transitivity of with step 3.1 would give or , so would be at most countable, contradicting [F6].
Therefore the binary sequences form a set equinumerous with and are uncountable, as claimed. The only objects constructed are the characteristic functions, defined by an explicit formula from , and the set , separated from by the condition ; at no point is an element selected from a nonempty family of sets, so no choice principle is used.
Remarks
-
The construction is the function-space form of Cantor's diagonal argument: reading as a subset of and as a binary sequence, the passage identifies with , and the diagonal set of Cantor's theorem: reappears here as the sequence that flips every diagonal bit.
-
This example is the case of the fact that infinite products of at-most-countable sets need not be at most countable, in agreement with is uncountable: the product is the power set in characteristic-function guise.
Depends on
- The set $B^{A}$ of all functions $A \to B$
- For sets $A$ and $B$ the collection of all functions $A \to B$ is a set, being a subset of $\mathcal{P}(A \times B)$
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- The power set $\mathcal{P}(x) = \{\, z : z \subseteq x \,\}$
- The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula $\varphi$, $\forall \bar p\,\forall x\,\exists y\,\forall z\,(z \in y \leftrightarrow (z \in x \wedge \varphi(z,\bar p)))$
- Subset $x \subseteq y$, proper subset $x \subsetneq y$, and the separation notation $\{\, z \in x : \varphi(z) \,\}$
- The image $R[A]$ and the preimage $R^{-1}[B]$ of a set under a relation
- The unordered pair $\{x,y\}$ and the singleton $\{x\} = \{x,x\}$
- $\{a,b\} = \{c,d\}$ if and only if ($a = c$ and $b = d$) or ($a = d$ and $b = c$); in particular $\{a\} = \{c,d\}$ if and only if $a = c = d$
- The Axiom of Extensionality: $\forall x\,\forall y\,(\forall z\,(z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y)$
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- Equinumerous sets, $A \approx B$ and $A \preceq B$
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$ is uncountable
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (complete author-hosted lecture notes, 307 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Introduction to Real Analysis, Volume I (author-hosted complete book PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)