How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A fixed partial-wave cutoff misses the forward high-frequency plane wave
Example
Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. For a fixed direction , consider the incident plane wave on the unit sphere. Let denote projection onto degrees . For each fixed , its value at the forward direction tends to zero as , whereas has modulus one. Thus a fixed angular cutoff has forward error tending to one; uniform high-frequency accuracy below one requires the cutoff to tend to infinity.
Verification
Given: , , and integer .
[F1] The addition kernel for degree is . Expanding the finite orthogonal projection in an orthonormal basis gives its kernel , so (Spherical harmonics form a complete basis with the addition formula).
[F2] In the coordinates , the map is a diffeomorphism from onto the open unit ball with its meridional half-plane removed, and . The omitted half-plane is null by the singular clause of the linear change-of-variables theorem. The change-of-variables theorem and the radial-cone definition of therefore give on this chart. Rotations preserve because they preserve radial cones and have determinant one (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not). Choosing a rotation taking to the north pole yields for every continuous .
[F3] For real , the complex derivative theorem gives ; this follows from the difference quotient with complex increment (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself).
[F4] For real , (, , and ).
By [F1] and [F2], . For a fixed polynomial , integration by parts gives . Summing finitely many terms yields for a finite constant independent of .
Since , step 1.1 and the reverse triangle inequality give . If integer cutoffs failed to tend to infinity as , there would be and a sequence with ; the finite maximum would give the same lower bound along that sequence. Thus a cutoff with uniform error bounded by any fixed for all sufficiently large must satisfy .
Depends on
- Spherical harmonics and partial-wave conventions in three dimensions
- Spherical harmonics form a complete basis with the addition formula
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
97 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Capel, Introduction to Scattering Theory, TALENT lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maximilian Kreuzer, Quantum Theory: Lecture Notes, version July 15, 2009, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)