How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integers are countably infinite:
Example
(Equinumerous sets, and ): the integers are countably infinite (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable). The argument is the two-injection route of The Schröder-Bernstein theorem rather than a closed formula. The map is injective (The naturals embed in the integers), and the quotient map is a surjective function (Let be an equivalence relation on with quotient map , and let . There is a function with if and only if implies ; and such a is then unique, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals); composing with the bijection of exhibits as a surjective image of , and A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of then supplies an injection explicitly as . Every ingredient is a definition or a canonical least element, so no choice principle is used; A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable then gives that is at most countable as well.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The naturals (The natural numbers (von Neumann)), the integers with classes for the equivalence relation (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation), the embedding of in (The naturals embed in the integers), and the quotient map (Let be an equivalence relation on with quotient map , and let . There is a function with if and only if implies ; and such a is then unique).
The map is injective (The naturals embed in the integers).
: there is a bijection , the inverse of the exhibited bijection (, Equinumerous sets, and , Injection, surjection, bijection).
For a nonempty set : is at most countable if and only if there is a surjection , and from such an the rule defines an injection (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of ).
If and then (The Schröder-Bernstein theorem); if and are at most countable then so is (A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable).
is countably infinite when and at most countable when it is finite or countably infinite (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable); means an injection exists (Equinumerous sets, and ); a composite of surjections is a surjection (Injection, surjection, bijection, A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
Verification
is a surjective function : this is the general quotient map statement applied to the equivalence relation of The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, whose equivalence-class property is The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation.
is a bijection, and in particular a surjection.
The map is an injection , so .
The composite is a surjection, as a composite of the surjections and ; hence is a surjective image of , and because .
Applying [F4] to the nonempty set and the surjection of step 2.1 gives an injection , explicitly ; hence .
Since by step 1.3 and by step 3.1, Schröder-Bernstein gives , so the integers are countably infinite.
With step 4.1, both and are at most countable, so their product is at most countable by [F5]. The injection is defined by the least element of a nonempty set of naturals and is the inverse of an exhibited bijection, so no choice principle is used.
Remarks
-
The route through is the same device that will enumerate : is a quotient of , the pairing lists pairs, and the least-index rule turns a list with repetitions into an injection. Nothing here needs a closed formula for a bijection .
-
For each fixed positive integer , the product of copies of is at most countable, by applications of A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable.
Depends on
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation
- The naturals embed in the integers
- Let $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on $A$ with quotient map $\pi : A \to A/{\sim}$, and let $f : A \to B$. There is a function $g : A/{\sim} \to B$ with $g \circ \pi = f$ if and only if $a \sim a'$ implies $f(a) = f(a')$; and such a $g$ is then unique
- $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} \approx \mathbb{N}$
- A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of $\mathbb{N}$
- The Schröder-Bernstein theorem
- Equinumerous sets, $A \approx B$ and $A \preceq B$
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (complete author-hosted lecture notes, 307 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Introduction to Real Analysis, Volume I (author-hosted complete book PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)