Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective and simple dual bases in a degenerate cyclotomic block

Example

Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the categorification and based-module identifications; the explicit finite calculations below are choice-free.

For I={0} and Λ=2Λ0, the degree-one supported block B=C[x]/x2 (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors) has simple D01=C with x↦0 and projective cover Y01=B. Therefore [Y01]=2[D01] in G0, whereas dim⁡Hom⁡(Y01,D01)=1. At parameter one the categorification images of The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module are

P00=D00=M00,P01=M01+M10,D01=12(M01+M10),P11=D11=M11.

The simple image is the PROJECTED vector πL01, not the unprojected L01=M01. With the normalized highest pairing C0 one has C0(PA,DB)=δAB across these three weights. In the degree-two block M2(C), the simple D11 is two-dimensional and is itself its projective cover; the abstract Fock weight is one-dimensional, not the underlying module. Thus the composition Cartan values are 1,2,1, while the projective/simple Hom pairing is the identity. Projective covers are self-dual here by the actual symmetric block forms, not merely because their heads are self-dual.

In the costandard basis (D00,D01,D11),

fD00=2D01,fD01=D11,fD11=0;eD00=0,eD01=D00,eD11=2D01.

The divided powers give f(2)D00=D11 and e(2)D11=D00, with all other second divided moves 0. Hence the integral ground-generated lattice is EXACTLY ZD00⊕2ZD01⊕ZD11, of index 2 in the full costandard lattice ZD00⊕ZD01⊕ZD11. The standard lattice has basis (P00,P01,P11), is integrally divided-power generated by its ground, and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice. Costandard ground cyclicity holds over Q, not over Z; crystal and composition-factor reachability do not imply integral vector generation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the invoked suppliers. The data I={0}, Λ=2Λ0 with charge (0,0), the degree-one and degree-two supported blocks, and the named categorification identifications of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G0 is the dual highest weight module and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module with the Fock dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. We verify every displayed pairing, self-duality, operator and lattice statement.

[F1]

The classes of the covers Y(A) and of the simples D(A) are dual bases of K0(Proj)×G0(Rep) under the Cartan Hom pairing, and the identification with the standard and costandard lattices is realized at parameter one by [Y(A)]↦PA and [D(A)]↦DA=πLA (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module).

[F2]

The Cartan pairing descends to the two Grothendieck groups and pairs the cover and simple bases dually (Projective and simple classes are dual bases under splitting, Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The degree-one block. For I={0}, level 2 and charge (0,0) the degree-one cyclotomic quotient is H1(0,0)=C[x1]/(x12) by the level-two instance of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra, and it is already supported, so B=C[x]/x2 with x=x1. Its radical is (x) and its quotient is C, so B is local; the unique simple is D01=C with x↦0, the regular module Y01=B is its projective cover, and the regular composition series 0⊂(x)⊂B has successive quotients D01,D01, giving [Y01]=2[D01] in G0. Every B-linear map B→D01 is determined by the image of 1, so dim⁡Hom⁡(Y01,D01)=1.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

The symmetric form on B and self-duality. The coefficient functional τ(a+bx)=b is a symmetrizing trace on B: it is linear, τ(uv)=τ(vu) for all u,v (both sides pick out the x-coefficient of the product), and its radical is zero because τ(x)≠0, so the associated form ⟨u,v⟩=τ(uv) has matrix (0110) in the basis (1,x), which is nonsingular. The anti-involution ∗ of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra that fixes x is the identity of B here, so the form is generator-fixing, and it exhibits an isomorphism Y01≅Y01⊛: the dual of the regular module with respect to the trace. This is the actual symmetric-algebra proof of cover self-duality, not an inference from self-duality of the head.

2.2step 1.1givenalgebra

The degree-two block and its simple. With x=x1, y=x2, u=s1 the relations give u2=1, [x,y]=0, ux=yu−1, uy=xu+1, x2=0, and from ux2=0 one gets y2=(x+y)u, so the eight words 1,x,y,xy,u,xu,yu,xyu span the degree-two algebra; the models (N,−N,−J) on M2(C) with N=E12 and J the swap matrix, (ϵ,1+ϵ,1) and (ϵ,−1+ϵ,−1) on C[ϵ]/ϵ2 satisfy all relations, and z=x+y is central with images 0,1+2ϵ,−1+2ϵ; the Hermite polynomials E0=(1−z2)2, E±=(1−E0±(3z−z3)/2)/2 map to the separate factor identities. Each factor is generated by its images of x,u, so the homomorphism is onto the eight-dimensional product; the eight-word spanning bound proves that the span of the eight words is isomorphic to M2(C)⊕B+⊕B− with B±=C[ϵ]/ϵ2. The supported content cut at 2α0 keeps the factor M2(C); its simple module C2 has Gram matrix J, since NtJ=JN and (−J)tJ=J(−J), and it is self-dual and projective, so its projective cover is itself and its endomorphism ring is C; degree 0 contributes C, and Hom-spaces between distinct content blocks vanish because they are different blocks. In particular the one-dimensional Fock weight vector M11 is not the two-dimensional module D11, and the degree-two projective cover has vector-space dimension 2 and composition length 1. Higher supported degrees vanish directly: in an all-zero-residue module on at least three strands, restriction to strands 1,2 forces x2=−x1 and x12=0 by the matrix factor. Since s2 commutes with x1, it commutes with x2, and the recursion gives x3=x2+s2. On either s2 eigenspace this is x2±1, which is invertible, contradicting nilpotence of x3 at residue zero. Thus such a nonzero module cannot exist; applying this to the regular module proves the supported algebra is zero in every degree at least three.

3.1step 2.2givenalgebra

The projected dual bases at parameter one. In the tensor square at parameter one, fM00=M01+M10, f(M01+M10)=2M11, and e reverses these moves with coefficients 2,1. Hence the ground constituent has basis P00,P01,P11 as displayed, and its complementary trivial line is M10−M01. Projection along this line gives D01=πM01=12(M01+M10) and fixes the endpoints. The normalized form is determined by C0(M00,M00)=1, e/f adjunction and orthogonality of distinct weights: C0(P01,P01)=C0(M00,eP01)=2, and 2C0(P11,P11)=C0(P01,eP11)=2. Thus the mixed vector is P01=M01+M10 of C0-norm 2, so the correct field dual is D01=12(M01+M10), and the endpoint vectors satisfy P00=D00=M00 and P11=D11=M11. The Gram matrix in the D-basis is diag⁡(1,12,1), and multiplying its first-argument basis by diag⁡(1,2,1) gives the identity matrix, which is the pairing C0(PA,DB)=δAB; this directly computes the parameter-one projected-simple dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and Simples, projectives and tiltings map to the three distinguished Fock bases, not an identification of L01=M01 with the simple.

4.1step 2.2step 3.1givenalgebra

The categorified residue operators. In these all-zero-residue blocks the residue projectors are the identities, so the bimodules are the explicit tower-inclusion bimodules. Induction from degree 0 to the degree-one block gives the regular module of B; the supported induction from B to the degree-two block M2(C) sends the simple C to C2 and the regular module B to M2(C), which is two copies of the simple C2; explicitly M2⊗BC=M2/M2N has dimension two and is the unique matrix-factor simple, whereas M2⊗BB=M2; restriction of C2 to B is the regular Jordan module B itself (the generator x of B acts on C2 as N with N2=0 and dim⁡ker⁡N=1), and restriction of D01=C to degree zero is the one-dimensional C-module. The right B-module M2 is free of rank two: each row is a regular B-module for right multiplication by N, so these induction functors are exact directly. These explicit bimodules realize the residue functors of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors and yield the displayed columns fD00=2D01, fD01=D11, fD11=0 and eD00=0, eD01=D00, eD11=2D01; equivalently, in the D-basis, f has columns (0,2,0)T,(0,0,1)T,0 and e has columns 0,(1,0,0)T,(0,2,0)T, so [e,f]=ef−fe is diag⁡(2,0,−2) in the sl2-normalization of Divided-power commutation and the simple Uqi(sl2) string modules.

5.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1givenalgebra

The normalized finite identifications. On projective classes the same bimodules give f[Y00]=[Y01], f[Y01]=2[Y11], e[Y01]=2[Y00] and e[Y11]=[Y01]. On simple classes they give step 4.1. Therefore the maps [YA]↦PA and [DA]↦DA intertwine both e and f with the explicit Fock matrices of step 3.1 and send the degree-zero class to the normalized ground. Over Q each module is ground generated, so these normalized intertwining maps are unique; consequently they agree with any named categorification identification with that normalization, rather than assuming a general bridge to establish this finite instance. Each cover/simple Hom space within a block has dimension one, by step 1.1 and the scalar endomorphism ring in step 2.2, while different degrees give zero Hom in the tower direct sum. Exactness of Hom from a projective makes the pairing additive on short exact sequences, so the pairing matrix is the identity on these bases. Its vector realization is precisely C0(PA,DB)=δAB from step 3.1, and the composition Cartan matrix is diag⁡(1,2,1).

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1givenalgebra

The index-two lattice and its cyclicity. The divided powers f(2)=f2/2 and e(2)=e2/2 give f(2)D00=D11 and e(2)D11=D00, and the displayed matrices preserve evenness of the D01-coordinate whenever the input has that coordinate even, so the lattice LZ=ZD00⊕2ZD01⊕ZD11 is stable under e,f, their divided powers and the toral operators at weights 2,0,−2. It is generated from the ground because fD00=2D01 and f(2)D00=D11. Its elements have D01-coordinate even, so it does not contain D01; hence it is a proper integral submodule containing the ground, of index 2 in the full costandard lattice, and D01 is not in the integral ground-generated span. Over Q division by 2 is available, so the ground vector generates the whole three-dimensional costandard space; the standard lattice is by step 5.1 the lattice with basis (P00,P01,P11), which is integrally generated by its ground under the divided powers and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice by step 3.1. This proves that integral costandard generation fails while the full integral duality and the standard divided-power statement survive.

7.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1given∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 verify the degree-one cover, its composition length against its Hom dimension, and the symmetric-form self-duality; step 2.2 and step 3.1 verify the degree-two block, the projected dual bases and the pairing identity; step 4.1 verifies the residue operators, their commutator and the categorified [Y01]=2[D01]; step 6.1 verifies the exact index-two lattice, its stability, its failure to contain D01 and the rational cyclicity. No step identifies the simple image with the unprojected monomial L01, and no self-duality is inferred from the head alone.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

97 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources