Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem

Statement

Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the category-O, Fock/global and Schur quotient suppliers invoked below.

Assume the bounded-below charge hypothesis: I is a nonempty set of consecutive integers bounded below and Λ∈P+ has level l and integral multicharge m1≥⋯≥ml in the letter alphabet I+. Use the actual admissible integral-origin stable realization of the tower definition, with roots cj+qj−nrow=mj. Then the two identifications of the preceding theorems hold simultaneously for the degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower HΛ of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors: K0(Proj(HΛ))≅V(Λ)Z with [Y(A)]↦PA and G0(Rep(HΛ))≅V(Λ)Z∗ with [D(A)]↦DA, [S(B)]↦SB, and they are mutually dual under the Cartan and Shapovalov pairings. Moreover:

(i) for every B∈ColΛ one has [S(B)]=∑A∈StdΛdA,B(1)[D(A)], where dA,B(s)∈Z[s] is defined by MB=∑AdA,B(s)LA (equivalently PA=∑BdA,B(s)MB);

(ii) the endomorphisms of both Grothendieck groups induced by ei,fi (i∈I) are the Chevalley operators ei,fi of U˙Z(glI+);

(iii) for A∈StdΛ and i∈I the module eiD(A) (resp. fiD(A)) is nonzero if and only if e~i(A)≠∅ (resp. f~i(A)≠∅), in which case it is a self-dual indecomposable module with irreducible socle and head isomorphic to D(e~i(A)) (resp. D(f~i(A)));

(iv) in the source's normalization the projective classes correspond to the quasi-canonical family PA, which at parameter one equals the canonical family on V(Λ)Z (PA=TA↑ at s=1), while the simple classes correspond to the dual-canonical family DA=πFockLA, the label bijections being ↑:StdαΛ→RevαΛ and its inverse rectification ↓:RevαΛ→StdαΛ.

For any admitted consecutive I, including Z and half-infinite sets, the same blockwise statements hold: for a fixed α and finite list of residue operations choose lower and upper cuts whose LETTER alphabet contains every charge and whose ROOT interval contains the support of α and the required shifted supports; added bottom tails are common ground and added top entries are absent, and the double-cut compatibility and the contractible-central-corner restriction identify these SAME Hecke blocks, intrinsic Spechts, projective/simple labels and residue maps. These compatible finite pieces give the original arbitrary-I statement. At level 0 only α=0 and the ground survive.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bounded-below data and the tower HΛ of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors, the two identifications of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G0 is the dual highest weight module and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module, the Fock data of The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module with its four families of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and the category-O side of The integral parabolic category-O blocks for higher-level Schur-Weyl duality, as well as the Axiom of Choice as used by the imported suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). We prove (i)-(iv) and the arbitrary-I extension.

[F1]

The classes of simples form a Z-basis of G0 for a finite-dimensional algebra, with composition multiplicities as coordinates (Simple classes freely generate the Grothendieck group of a length category).

[F2]

The Axiom of Choice holds: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2givenalgebra

Both identifications and their duality. By The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G0 is the dual highest weight module the map [D(A)]↦DA identifies G0(Rep(HΛ)) with the full integral costandard lattice V(Λ)Z∗ and is compatible with the standard classes [S(B)]↦SB; by The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module the map [Y(A)]↦PA identifies K0(Proj(HΛ)) with the standard lattice V(Λ)Z, the embedding of projectives induces the lattice inclusion, and the Cartan pairing is the normalized highest pairing C0(PA,DB)=δAB of The Fock pairing matches the projective-simple and standard-costandard pairings. Since the two lattice identifications are the actual source dictionary [L(A)]↦LA, [P(A)]↦PA of Simples, projectives and tiltings map to the three distinguished Fock bases at parameter one, the identifications hold simultaneously and are mutually dual.

1.2F2givenconstructalgebra

The actual surviving-head calculation. Fix A∈StdΛ and let M=fiOL(A), or M=eiOL(A). The local residue theorem The residue translation functors give the integrable Fock-space action says M=0 exactly when the corresponding crystal edge is absent; otherwise its head is the simple L(C) at that edge, and it is self-dual. The ground component StdΛ is closed under the two crystal operators by Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule, so C is standard. The actual detector/corner Hom comparison of The Whittaker functor is exact and fully faithful on the required projectives applies to maps from a Std-head object to a Std-socle object. Applying it to M and L(B) for each standard B gives Hom⁡H(πM,D(B))≅Hom⁡g(M,L(B)), of dimension δCB. Since the D(B) are the complete distinct Hecke simples, this computes the head of πM as the single simple D(C) and proves πM≠0. The natural intertwining of Category-O translation intertwines residue induction and restriction identifies πM with the appropriate Hecke translate of D(A), and its natural duality comparison makes that translate self-dual. Its socle is therefore also D(C). A direct sum of two nonzero finite-length modules has at least two nonzero simple head summands, so a module with simple head is indecomposable. If the edge is absent the translate is zero by the same natural isomorphism. This proves (iii) in both directions by a Hom calculation; no arbitrary head or socle preservation by an exact quotient is assumed.

1.3F2givenalgebra

The parameter-one normalization and label bijections. At parameter one the quasi-canonical family satisfies PA=TA↑ and the costandard family is DA=πFockLA with A↦A↑ the inverse rectification from standard to reverse-standard tableaux and ↓ the rectification in the opposite direction, by The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases and The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases; this gives (iv).

1.4given

Level zero. For level 0 the tower has H0Λ=C and HdΛ=0 for d>0 by the level-zero convention of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors, so only α=0 and the ground class remain, consistently with the two identifications being the rank-one lattices ZP∅=ZD∅.

2.1step 1.1F1givenalgebra

The decomposition formula (i). The formula [S(B)]=∑A∈StdΛdA,B(1)[D(A)] for every B∈ColΛ is the standard-class half of the identification of step 1.1; the coefficient dictionary MB=∑AdA,B(s)LA, PA=∑BdA,B(s)MB is that of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases, and the full polynomial transition matrix, its unitriangularity and the restriction to standard simple labels are those of Parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials give the dual-canonical transition matrix and Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule. This proves (i); no off-standard label is made a simple class.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra

The Chevalley operators (ii). The residue operators on G0 are the Chevalley operators by The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G0 is the dual highest weight module, and the corresponding statement on K0 for projective classes is The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module; on the category-O side both statements are the integrable Fock action of The residue translation functors give the integrable Fock-space action transferred by the actual natural residue comparisons. This proves (ii).

2.3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3givenalgebra

Arbitrary consecutive I. Let I be any nonempty consecutive set (possibly unbounded above or below), fix a content α and a finite list of residue operations, and choose a finite lower endpoint k and upper endpoint r so that the LETTER alphabet [k,r+1] contains every charge and the ROOT interval [k,r] contains the support of α and every shifted support occurring in the operations. The common-tail and double-cut compatibility of Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule and The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases, together with the contractible-central-corner restriction of The higher-level Schur-Weyl projective generator and Schur functor and The higher-level Schur-Weyl double centralizer and Schur quotient, shows that added bottom occupancy is maximal in every column (so every new entry is forced ground) and added top occupancy is zero, and that the monomial, bar, global and projected basis equations are unchanged on the selected finite weight set. Hence the Hecke block is the same content component of the same Hd(m), with the same intrinsic Specht modules, projective and simple labels, residue projectors and residue maps, and the blockwise statements of (i)-(iv) glue along these compatible finite pieces to give the arbitrary-I statement. At the level of the block decomposition of the tower, the excluded blocks for I≠Z are real (the supported cut is proper by The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors), and no equality of HΛ with ⨁dHd(m) is used.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3given∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 assembles the simultaneous full upper/lower integral lattice identifications and their perfect mutual pairing; step 1.2 proves the residue head/socle/indecomposability rule; step 1.3 proves the parameter-one normalization with its correctly directed label bijections; steps 2.1–2.2 prove the decomposition formula and Chevalley action; step 2.3 glues the actual same-block and full-basis maps for arbitrary consecutive I; and step 1.4 gives the level-zero ground line. These are all clauses of the statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

139 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources