How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The parabolic category-O Grothendieck group is the integral Fock module
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and bounded below. The standard-class map identifies the direct-sum of the genuine tableau parabolic blocks with the full integral Fock module, with matching multiset degrees and the residue Chevalley action of . For every projective and finite-length , In particular ; no false standard/simple orthogonality is asserted. The projective, simple and tilting basis identifications are proved separately.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The direct-sum parabolic blocks with their finite-length simple and standard classes, the residue functors and their Fock operators, the source forms and bases, and the projective covers.
Standard bases and operators (Residue Casimir operators and local affine-Hecke actions, Parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials give the dual-canonical transition matrix, The integral parabolic category-O blocks for higher-level Schur-Weyl duality, The Grothendieck group and character of O): the standard-class map, character injectivity on each block, the mixed multiplicity matrix, the integral Fock Chevalley action and the standard/simple bases.
Fock bases and pairing (The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases, The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases, Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators, Projective Hom pairing descends and is graded sesquilinear, Simple and standard bases of K0(O), Simple classes freely generate the Grothendieck group of a length category, Grothendieck group of an essentially small abelian category, BGG reciprocity): the source forms with monomial Gram matrix the inverse ordinary-bar matrix, the delta pairings, additivity of the projective-simple Hom pairing, and the simple/standard Grothendieck bases.
Residue action and heads/socles (The residue translation functors give the integrable Fock-space action, Indecomposable tilting objects exist and are classified in parabolic category O): the Fock Chevalley action on classes, and the tilting basis.
Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The standard-class map is an isomorphism. In each finite block the standard classes form a basis of the Grothendieck group and characters are injective, while the residue functors act on the standard basis by the explicit single-entry moves; the Fock monomials satisfy the identical relations and have the same degrees. Hence is a degree-preserving isomorphism in each block, and it extends to the direct sum over the blocks because the direct sum decomposition is by central character on both sides.
The transition matrix and duality at . Write with simple rows and standard columns. Then , so it is the simple-to-standard expansion that uses . BGG reciprocity instead gives , hence ; this matrix is the transposed standard/simple multiplicity array when rows are projective labels, not its inverse. Under the standard-class map these are exactly the defining and expansions. On the actual finite type- cuts, each nonconstant term of the quasi- root-factor expansion has a factor and coefficients regular at (the quantum-factorial denominators have nonzero ordinary-factorial values there). Thus the tensor bar matrix specializes to the identity; passage to the primitive wedge factors preserves this specialization. The source monomial Gram matrices, which are its inverse, are consequently the identity at . Multiplying the projective array by the simple array yields . No inverse BGG multiplicity matrix is asserted.
The general Hom pairing. For a projective and a finite-length , the functor is exact, so its dimension on is additive on a composition series and equals the pairing of with under the duality of step 2.1; in particular . This is a projective/simple statement: the standard/simple matrix is the unitriangular mixed multiplicity matrix, not the identity, so no standard/simple orthogonality is claimed.
Conclusion. The standard-class map identifies the direct-sum with the integral Fock module compatibly with degrees and the residue Chevalley action; the projective/simple pairing is the Fock pairing at , giving and , while standard/simple orthogonality is false; the projective, simple and tilting bases are proved separately.
Depends on
- The residue translation functors give the integrable Fock-space action
- The integral parabolic category-O blocks for higher-level Schur-Weyl duality
- The residue translation functors on the sum of parabolic blocks
- The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module
- The column monomial basis of the higher-level Fock module
- The Grothendieck group and character of O
- Simple and standard bases of K0(O)
- Simple classes freely generate the Grothendieck group of a length category
- Grothendieck group of an essentially small abelian category
- Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators
- BGG reciprocity
- The Axiom of Choice
- The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases
- Residue Casimir operators and local affine-Hecke actions
- Indecomposable tilting objects exist and are classified in parabolic category O
- Parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials give the dual-canonical transition matrix
- Projective Hom pairing descends and is graded sesquilinear
- The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases
Used by
- The Whittaker functor from the relevant parabolic category-O summand Definition
- Opposite-parabolic Ringel duality on a finite ideal Example
- Projective and simple dual bases in a degenerate cyclotomic block Example
- The Fock pairing matches the projective-simple and standard-costandard pairings Lemma
- Simples, projectives and tiltings map to the three distinguished Fock bases Theorem
- The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem Theorem
- The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G₀ is the dual highest weight module Theorem
- The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K₀ is the highest weight module Theorem
- The Whittaker functor is exact and fully faithful on the required projectives Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
129 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, The degenerate analogue of Ariki's categorification theorem, Math. Z. 266 (2010) 877-919 (complete 44-page arXiv article) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Volodymyr Mazorchuk, Lectures on Algebraic Categorification, QGM Master Class Series, European Mathematical Society 2012 (complete 77-page arXiv lecture-note set) (standard reference, not scraped)