Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Standard Aij as point pushes after relabeling

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, let n≥2 and 1≤i<j≤n, and use the base configuration Q=(q1,…,qn) and positive half twists of The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite. The standard pure braid Aij∈PBn is the image of the geometric word Wij of Standard geometric pure braid generators A_ij. Put Y(j):=int⁡D2∖{qk:k≠j}. For a based loop γ of Y(j) at qj, let Mj(γ)(t):=(q1,…,qj−1,γ(t),qj+1,…,qn)∈Fn(int⁡D2). This is the ordered motion in which only the j-th point moves.

Choose the compatible family of local meridian circles and stems constructed by the puncture-avoiding fan argument in the proof of The Ain are meridian generators of the forgetful free kernel. Thus, for each r<n, take 0<ϵr≤hn/10, let Cr={z:∣z−qr∣=ϵr} and cr=qr+(ϵr,0), and use the local stem τr from qr+1 to cr selected in that compatible family, inside Ur∖{qr}. For i<j, let hi,j:=Hj−1∘⋯∘Hi+1, where Hs represents the positive half twist σs and the empty composition for j=i+1 is the identity. The associated meridian stem from qj to Ci is hi,j∘τi; let γi,jcw be the based loop that follows this stem, traverses Ci clockwise once, and returns along the reverse stem. These are the compatible standard meridian stems obtained by transporting the adjacent local stem through the successive half twists. Then:

  1. Point push. For every 1≤i<j≤n, Aij=ι∗F[Mj(γi,jcw)]∈PBn. Thus the positive standard generator is the class of the motion that holds the other n−1 labelled points fixed and moves the j-th point clockwise once around qi along the stated stem.
  2. Relabeled form. Let ρ∈Sn satisfy ρ(j)=n, ρ(k)=k−1 for j<k≤n, and ρ(k)=k for k<j. The coordinate permutation (Rx)k:=xρ−1(k) gives homeomorphisms R∘ and RD on the open and closed ordered configuration spaces, respectively. It takes Q to Qρ=(q1,…,qj−1,qj+1,…,qn,qj). Put Yρ:=int⁡D2∖{qk:k≠j}, and define the open terminal-coordinate inclusion κ~ρ:π1(Yρ,qj)⟶π1(Fn(int⁡D2),Qρ),[γ]⟼[(q1,…,qj−1,qj+1,…,qn,γ)]. With ι∗F,ρ the open-to-closed map at basepoint Qρ, set κρ:=ι∗F,ρ∘κ~ρ. Then R∗D(Aij)=κρ([γi,jcw])∈π1(Fn(D2),Qρ), the loop class in which the last coordinate moves clockwise around qi and all other coordinates remain fixed.
  3. Terminal mapping-class sign. For i<n, Θn(Ain)=Push⁡n([γi,ncw]),Θn:=Ψnmc∘(Ψnconf)−1, where Θn is the isomorphism of Point pushing is the kernel of forgetting the last disk puncture. The inverse-endpoint convention in Point pushing the last puncture makes the clockwise fibre meridian correspond to the positive generator. The raw ordered slice of the positive standard word runs counterclockwise; the configuration identification inverts that slice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, n≥2, 1≤i<j≤n, the base configuration Q, the half twists σ1,…,σn−1 and their supports U1,…,Un−1, the words Wij, and the maps in the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

In ZF, AC implies DC and DC implies countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

The Statement of The Ain are meridian generators of the forgetful free kernel says that, under AC, the last-coordinate fibre inclusion κ identifies Fm−1 with the kernel of forgetting PBm→PBm−1, and the m−1 configuration-group images Ψ([A1m]),…,Ψ([Am−1,m]) of the standard geometric classes form a free basis. For the compatible stem family constructed in its proof, if [λr] is the counterclockwise meridian class in the fibre, then Ψ([Arm])=(κ∗[λr])−1. Here [Arm]=[Wrm] is the geometric braid class and, by [F3], its configuration-group image is the element denoted Arm in this example; κ∗[λ] is the closed-disc image of the open fibre loop. The supplier Statement makes this last-column assertion; its proof also supplies the local winding and conjugation arguments used below for arbitrary j. It does not assert that the whole word motion is braid-isotopic to a one-coordinate motion.

[F3]

The standard generators are Ars=Ψnconf([Wrs]), where Wrs=σs−1⋯σr+1σr2σr+1−1⋯σs−1−1. The rightmost factor is the bottom one, [γ⋆β]=[γ][β], and Ψnconf([β])=(ι∗F[zβ])−1 for the ordered coordinate loop zβ (Standard geometric pure braid generators A_ij, Pure geometric braids and ordered configuration loops).

[F4]

The positive half twist σr exchanges qr,qr+1, is supported in Ur=B(mr,3hn/2), and fixes every other base point; Ur∩Us=∅ when ∣r−s∣>1. Here the base points are equally spaced by 2hn, so the center of Ur+1 is distance 3hn from qr (The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F5]

Geometric braids form a group under stacking, with the right factor running first; coordinate paths of pure braids are loops in Fn(int⁡D2), and reversed braid paths represent inverse classes (The isotopy classes of geometric braids based at Q form a group, and the endpoint permutation is a homomorphism, Stacking of geometric braids is a well-defined associative operation on isotopy classes).

[F6]

Coordinate permutations act by homeomorphisms on both Fn(int⁡D2) and Fn(D2), and the open-to-closed inclusions commute with these permutations (The symmetric group acts continuously and freely on Fn(X) by permuting labels, The interior-disc and closed-disc configuration spaces are homotopy equivalent).

[F7]

The maps Ψnconf:Gnpure→PBn and Ψnmc:Gn→Mod⁡(D2,Q;∂D2) are group isomorphisms, with Ψnconf([β])=(ι∗F[zβ])−1 and, for the raw unordered slice S(β), Ψnmc([β])=δ([S(β)]−1); on a half twist, Ψnmc([σr])=[Hr], where Hr is orientation-preserving, supported in Ur, and exchanges qr,qr+1 (Pure geometric braids and ordered configuration loops, Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes).

[F8]

The point-pushing map for the last puncture is Push⁡n([γ])=δ([γˉ]), where γˉ is the unordered loop of the ordered motion that moves only qn and δ is the inverse-endpoint boundary map. The braid-to-mapping-class map sends that raw geometric motion to δ([γˉ]−1)=Push⁡n([γ])−1 (Point pushing the last puncture, Boundary map from point motions).

[F9]

Under AC, Θn=Ψnmc∣Gnpure∘(Ψnconf)−1 is an isomorphism and Θn∘κ=Push⁡n for the terminal-coordinate fibre inclusion (Point pushing is the kernel of forgetting the last disk puncture).

[F10]

Fn(X) is the space of pairwise distinct tuples in Xn, PBn=π1(Fn(D2),Q), and ι∗F:π1(Fn(int⁡D2),Q)→PBn is an isomorphism (Ordered configuration spaces Fn(X), The pure braid group PBn as the fundamental group of an ordered configuration space, The interior-disc and closed-disc configuration spaces are homotopy equivalent).

[F11]

The local two-point winding computation in the proof of The Ain are meridian generators of the forgetful free kernel identifies F2(Ur)≅S1×C with C convex and shows that the raw coordinate loop of σr2 has relative winding +1, equal to a counterclockwise local meridian motion of qr+1 around qr. By the inverse-endpoint convention, Ψnmc([σr2])=Push⁡qr+1([λrccw])−1=Push⁡qr+1([λrcw]). The proof's conjugation argument establishes, for any mapping class h taking a marked point p to p′, the typed naturality hPush⁡p([α])h−1=Push⁡p′([h∘α]), where α is a loop in the complement of Q∖{p} based at p and h∘α is based at p′ in the complement of Q∖{p′}. There Push⁡p is the inverse endpoint of an ambient lift of this single-point motion; for p=qn it agrees with [F8].

Verification

technique · direct

Choice bookkeeping. AC supplies DC and countable choice, so the cited fibre exact sequence, braid identifications, and point-pushing identifications are available. [A1, F1, F2, F7, F9]

1.1A1F1F2F7F9

The choice hypothesis discharges the cited fibration and mapping-class identifications.

Terminal fibre case. Fix i<n and let [λiccw] be the counterclockwise based meridian class in the last-coordinate fibre at qn from [F2]. Write [λicw]=[λiccw]−1. The standard generator in PBn is Ain=Ψnconf([Win]); applying Ψnconf to Ain again would be ill-typed. The source formula and the fact that the fibre inclusion is a homomorphism give Ain=(κ∗[λiccw])−1=κ∗[λicw]=ι∗F[Mn(λicw)]. This proves the terminal instance of claim 1. [F2, F3, F10]

2.1step 1.1F2F3F10

Thus the terminal generator is the closed-disc image of the clockwise last-coordinate meridian.

A point-motion loop maps to its point push. Let p=qj and let γ be any based loop in Y(j) at qj. By the geometric-braid/configuration identification [F3] and the open-to-closed map [F10], the ordered loop Mj(γ) defines a pure geometric braid βγ whose unordered slice is γˉ. Its inverse braid βγ−1 has coordinate loop class [Mj(γ)]−1 and unordered slice class [γˉ]−1. The braid/configuration and braid/mapping-class maps [F7] therefore give Ψnconf(βγ−1)=(ι∗F[Mj(γ)]−1)−1=ι∗F[Mj(γ)],Ψnmc(βγ−1)=δ(([γˉ]−1)−1)=δ([γˉ]). For any marked point qj, the inverse-endpoint point-motion map constructed in the kernel lemma's proof is Push⁡qj([γ])=δ([γˉ]); for j=n this agrees with [F8]. Thus Θn(ι∗F[Mj(γ)])=Ψnmc(βγ−1)=Push⁡qj([γ]). This identity will compare classes by the isomorphism Θn and uses no fibre-inclusion injectivity. [F3, F7, F8, F10, F11]

2.2step 1.1F3F7F8F10F11

For every marked point, the image under Θn of its one-coordinate motion is the corresponding point push.

Transport the adjacent point push. Fix i<j. Choose the local circle Ci and stem τi from the statement, and let λicw be the loop following τi, once clockwise around Ci, and back. Put gi,j:=[σj−1]⋯[σi+1]∈Gn and let hi,j=Hj−1∘⋯∘Hi+1 be its mapping-class representative, with the rightmost map acting first. Hence hi,j(qi+1)=qj and hi,j(qi)=qi. It fixes Ci pointwise: each support Ur for r≥i+2 is disjoint from Ui, while every point of Ci is at distance at least 3hn−ϵi≥2.9hn>3hn/2 from the center of Ui+1. Thus hi,j∘τi is a stem from qj to Ci, and hi,j∘λicw=γi,jcw. The path avoids all punctures other than its basepoint because hi,j permutes Q and sends the omitted point qi+1 to qj. The word identity [F3], first-under-second product, and the local winding and typed naturality in [F11] now give Θn(Aij)=Ψnmc([Wij])=hi,jΨnmc([σi2])hi,j−1=hi,jPush⁡qi+1([λicw])hi,j−1=Push⁡qj([γi,jcw]). For j=i+1, hi,j is the identity and this is exactly the local winding case. [F3, F7, F11]

2.3step 1.1F3F4F5F7F11

The conjugated geometric generator has the point-push image along the transported standard stem.

Point-push claim for every pair. By step 2.2, the image under Θn of the one-coordinate motion along γi,jcw is Push⁡qj([γi,jcw]). By step 2.3, this equals Θn(Aij). Since Θn is an isomorphism by [F9], it is injective, and therefore Aij=ι∗F[Mj(γi,jcw)]. This proves claim 1 without an isotopy assertion about the full word motion. [F9, step 2.2, step 2.3]

3.1F9step 2.2step 2.3

Equality under Θn proves the point-push statement for every pair.

Relabeled form and open-to-closed maps. Let Mnρ(γ)=(q1,…,qj−1,qj+1,…,qn,γ) be the open ordered loop based at Qρ. Pointwise, R∘∘Mj(γ)=Mnρ(γ). The coordinate-permutation square commutes with the open-to-closed inclusions, so R∗D(ι∗F[Mj(γ)])=ι∗F,ρ[Mnρ(γ)]=κρ([γ]). Apply this identity to the loop from the point-push claim to obtain R∗D(Aij)=κρ([γi,jcw]). This is the relabeled terminal-coordinate form. The argument uses functoriality only and asserts no injectivity of κ~ρ or κρ. [F6, F10, step 3.1]

4.1F6F10step 3.1

The coordinate permutation carries the proven open motion to the stated closed-disc terminal-coordinate class.

Terminal mapping-class sign. For i<n, the fibre formula and [F9] give Θn(Ain)=Θn(κ∗[λicw])=Push⁡n([λicw]). The source formula [F2] identifies the configuration-group image of [Win] as (κ∗[λiccw])−1, while [F3] identifies the same image as (ι∗F[zWin])−1 for the raw ordered coordinate loop. Equating and inverting gives ι∗F[zWin]=κ∗[λiccw]: the raw ordered slice is counterclockwise in the fibre. The configuration identification inverts it, so Ain=κ∗[λicw]. The inverse-endpoint convention then gives exactly the clockwise point push. [F2, F3, F8, F9, step 2.1]

5.1F2F3F8F9step 2.1∎

This proves the terminal mapping-class sign in claim 3 with the positive generator clockwise.

Remarks

  • The stem for Aij is the image of the adjacent local stem under the actual mapping-class representative Hj−1∘⋯∘Hi+1. This specifies the compatible meridian path and preserves its clockwise orientation.
  • The relabeling is a coordinate-permutation homeomorphism from basepoint Q to Qρ. The open terminal-coordinate map and its closed-disc composite have distinct codomains; only the latter is denoted κρ in the statement.
  • The example identifies standard generators and makes no new generation or presentation claim. The proof uses the local two-point winding and typed point-push conjugation already proved in The Ain are meridian generators of the forgetful free kernel.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources