Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An augmented coideal ideal of an enveloping algebra is generated by its primitive part

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field of characteristic 0 (Field, The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise) and let l be a Lie algebra over k (Lie algebras over a field). Equip its universal enveloping algebra U(l) with the standard cocommutative Hopf structure (Hopf-algebra structure on U(g)), with coproduct Δ(x)=x⊗1+1⊗x for x∈l and counit ε(x)=0. If J⊴U(l) is a two-sided ideal such that

Δ(J)⊆J⊗U(l)+U(l)⊗J,J⊆ker⁡ε,

then j:=J∩l is a Lie ideal and J=U(l)j=jU(l). Thus J is uniquely determined by j among two-sided ideals satisfying both displayed conditions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a characteristic-zero field k, a Lie algebra l, and a two-sided ideal J satisfying the coproduct and augmentation conditions.

[A1]

AC is the assertion that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[L2]

Under AC, every set, hence any chosen basis, can be well ordered (The well-ordering theorem).

[L3]

For a supplied totally ordered basis of l, ordered monomials form a basis of U(l) and the PBW symbol map identifies gr⁡U(l) with S(l) (Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem).

[L4]

The standard coproduct and counit are algebra maps, and are primitive on l (Hopf-algebra structure on U(g), Bialgebras, counits and antipodes over a commutative ring).

[L5]

The PBW filtration FnU(l) is exhaustive and is spanned by products of at most n elements of l (PBW filtration on the enveloping algebra).

[L7]

In a characteristic-zero field, every positive integer is nonzero and invertible (Field, The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise).

Proof

technique · PBW filtration and induction on degree
1.1A1L1L2L3L5construct

By [A1] and [L1], choose a basis of l; by [L2], give it a total well-order. Apply [L3]. In particular l embeds in U(l), and the associated graded algebra of the filtration [L5] is S(l).

1.2L3L4L5algebra

By [L4], Δ is filtered for the total-degree filtration on U(l)⊗U(l): this holds on each degree-one generator because Δ(x)=x⊗1+1⊗x, and hence on products because Δ is an algebra map. Its associated graded coproduct on S(l) is the algebra map making every x∈l primitive, since the two maps agree on the algebra generators.

1.3A1L1L3L4L5construct

Put Jn:=J∩FnU(l) and K:=gr⁡J. The ideal property makes K a graded ideal of S(l). To see its coideal property, use AC and [L1] to choose a complement Wn of Jn−1 in Jn; its image in Fn/Fn−1 is a subspace, so choose a complement there and lift it to Cn⊂Fn. Thus Fn=Fn−1⊕Wn⊕Cn and Jn=Jn−1⊕Wn. The total-degree filtration then has associated graded pieces Wp⊗(Wq⊕Cq) and (Wp⊕Cp)⊗Wq for J⊗U+U⊗J. Taking highest-degree symbols in the assumed containment gives ΔS(l)(K)⊆K⊗S(l)+S(l)⊗K.

1.4L3L4L5givenbasealgebra

Since ε(J)=0 and F0U(l)=k1, we have J0=0. PBW gives F1U(l)=k1⊕l, so K0=0 and K1=j. Also j is a Lie ideal: for x∈l and a∈j, the commutator xa−ax=[x,a] lies in J because J is two-sided, and lies in l by the enveloping relation.

1.5L6givenalgebra

Let Ij be the ideal of S(l) generated by j, and let π:S(l)→S(l/j) be the map induced by the vector-space quotient. The universal properties in [L6] construct inverse algebra maps between S(l)/Ij and S(l/j): maps from either algebra to a commutative unital k-algebra A correspond exactly to linear maps l→A vanishing on j. The maps are inverse because they agree with the identity on the algebra generators. Hence ker⁡π=Ij.

2.1L6L7step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5inductionihalgebra

We prove by induction on n that Kn⊆Ij∩Sn(l). The claim holds in degrees 0 and 1 by step 1.4. For n≥2, take z∈Kn. Its reduced coproduct has, in bidegree (p,q) with p,q>0 and p+q=n, a component in Kp⊗Sq(l)+Sp(l)⊗Kq by step 1.3; both p,q<n, so the induction hypothesis makes its image under π⊗π zero. Thus π(z) has zero reduced coproduct and is primitive in S(l/j). The (n−1,1) component of the coproduct of a homogeneous degree-n element f is the sum obtained by placing each of its n factors in the second tensor slot; multiplying the two slots gives nf. If f is primitive this component is zero, so [L7] forces f=0. Consequently π(z)=0 and z∈Ij.

3.1step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1algebra

The reverse inclusion Ij⊆K follows because K is an ideal and contains K1=j. Hence gr⁡J=K=Ij.

4.1L3L5step 3.1algebra

Since J is two-sided, the left and right ideals U(l)j and jU(l) lie in J, so their associated graded spaces lie in gr⁡J=Ij by step 3.1. Conversely, each degree-n element of Ij is a finite sum of products in Sn−1(l)j, and PBW lifts that sum to an element of U(l)j∩Fn with the same symbol. The right-handed products lift identically. Hence both associated graded spaces equal Ij.

5.1step 1.4step 2.1step 4.1inductiondischarge-induction: step 2.1given∎

For x∈J∩Fn, step 4.1 supplies y∈U(l)j∩Fn with the same degree-n symbol as x. Then x−y∈J∩Fn−1; descending induction, starting with J∩F0=0 from step 1.4, gives x∈U(l)j. The identical argument with the right-generated ideal gives x∈jU(l). Thus J=U(l)j=jU(l), and applying this equality to any other ideal satisfying the same two conditions and the same intersection proves the stated uniqueness.

Remarks

  • The zero Lie algebra is included: then U(0)=k, ker⁡ε=0, and the only admissible ideal is J=0.
  • The augmentation hypothesis is necessary. For nonzero l, the ideal J=U(l) satisfies the coproduct containment, but J∩l=l while U(l)(J∩l)=ker⁡ε≠U(l).
  • The unrestricted “largest ideal with fixed primitive part” claim is false: for l=kx, U(l)=k[x], the ideals 0 and (x2) have the same intersection 0 with l, and 0⊊(x2).
  • AC is used to choose and well-order a basis of arbitrary l, as required by the supplied general PBW theorem, and to split the induced filtration of J in step 1.3. These are the only nonconstructive choices in this proof; the characteristic-zero use is exactly the invertibility of n in step 2.1. No assertion is made in positive characteristic.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources