Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The formal quantum Serre half embeds in the shuffle algebra and is degreewise free

Statement

Let Uℏn+, V, ⟨V⟩, and pℏ:Uℏb+→V be as in The formal quantum shuffle Borel and its Cartan crossed product, with R=C⟦ℏ⟧ and q=eℏ, and let Un+ be the positive half of the Kac–Moody algebra. Assume AC; it is used only to apply the two-sided coideal lemma in step 3.1. For an indeterminate q′, let Uq′n+ be the algebra over C(q′) with the same generators and positive quantum Serre relations, with qi′=q′di. Then:

(i) The composite Uℏn+→Uℏb+→pℏV is an isomorphism of R-algebras onto ⟨V⟩. In particular, Uℏn+ is a free R-module and each root-graded component Uℏn+[α] is a finite-rank free R-module.

(ii) The classical limit is the classical half: Uℏn+/ℏUℏn+≅Un+ as NI-graded algebras, by ei↦eˉi.

(iii) For every α∈Q+, rank⁡RUℏn+[α]=dim⁡CUn+[α]=dim⁡C(q′)Uq′n+[α].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite symmetrizable Cartan datum and the formal Borel and quantum half of The formal quantum shuffle Borel and its Cartan crossed product.

[F1]

The formal Borel defines the conditional algebra map pℏ, gives V=⟨V⟩⊗RAC as an R-module, and gives the coproduct on Cartan symbols and words (The formal quantum shuffle Borel and its Cartan crossed product).

[F2]

For each i≠j, the positive quantum Serre sum vanishes in ⟨V⟩; this is part (i) only of The quantum Serre sums vanish in the shuffle algebra, and the opposite Serre ideal annihilates the shuffle half. The supplier's annihilation statement (ii) is not needed for this embedding proof.

[F3]

At qi=1, the positive Serre relations present Un+, and the classical Borel is generated by its Cartan and positive simple generators (Serre presentation of a kac moody algebra).

[F4]

Under AC, an augmented two-sided coideal ideal J in Ul is generated by its primitive intersection J∩l (An augmented coideal ideal of an enveloping algebra is generated by its primitive part).

[F5]

The opposite classical Borels are degreewise perfectly paired Lie bialgebras (The opposite Borels of a symmetrizable Kac–Moody algebra are root-degreewise dual Lie bialgebras).

[F6]

The formal order on R is additive on nonzero products, and R is a domain (Formal order is non-Archimedean under sums and additive under products over a domain).

[F7]

A finitely generated module over a PID is its torsion submodule plus a finite free summand (A finitely generated PID module is its torsion submodule direct-summed with a finite free module).

[F8]

The symmetric Gaussian binomial is defined by the quantum-factorial quotient (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

[F9]

AC is the assertion that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F11]

For a finite-dimensional vector space, the dimension of a quotient by a finite-dimensional subspace is the ambient dimension minus the subspace dimension (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T).

[F13]

A PID is a domain in which every ideal is principal (Principal ideal domain).

[F14]

Every finitely generated module over a PID is a finite direct sum of cyclic modules (Invariant-factor decomposition of a finitely generated module over a PID).

[F15]

The enveloping algebra is the tensor algebra quotient by the Lie-relator ideal, and Lie algebra maps into associative algebras extend uniquely to it (Universal enveloping algebra, Universal property of the enveloping algebra).

[F16]

Tensoring is right exact, so a quotient presentation remains a quotient by the scalar-extended relation subspace (Tensoring is right exact).

[F17]

The standard coproduct on Ub+ makes its Lie generators primitive and is cocommutative (Hopf-algebra structure on U(g)).

[F18]

A generalized Cartan matrix has a finite nonempty index set I={1,…,n} with n≥1 (Generalized cartan matrix).

[F19]

The symmetrizer entries di are positive integers and qi=qdi (Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups).

[F20]

R=C⟦ℏ⟧ is the formal power-series ring with coefficientwise operations (Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional [xn]).

[F21]

eℏ is the formal exponential ∑m≥0ℏm/m! (Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra).

[F22]

A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit (A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit).

[F23]

A submodule of a finite-rank free PID module is finite-rank free (A submodule of a free module of finite rank over a PID is free of no larger rank).

[F24]

Every symmetric Gaussian coefficient is a Laurent polynomial in qi (The quantum Pascal recurrences, the Gauss product formula and Gaussian integrality).

Proof

technique · Reduce the conditional shuffle map to the classical Borel, prove that its kernel has no primitive part by graded Lie-bialgebra duality, and then compare finite presentations over $R$ and over the generic field
1.1F1F2F3F8F18algebra

By [F2], the generator assignment of [F1] defines pℏ:Uℏb+→V. Its restriction to the Cartan coefficient algebra AC is the identity, and its image contains every one-letter word [vi]. Every element of V=⟨V⟩⊗RAC is a finite sum of products of a letter-generated element and an element of AC, so pℏ is surjective. In the symmetric formula, [m]i=qi−(m−1)(1+qi2+⋯+qi2m−2) specializes to m at qi=1; therefore [m]i! specializes to m! and each Gaussian coefficient specializes to (mr). By [F3], the reduced source is Ub+ and reduction defines a surjective graded algebra map p:Ub+→V0:=V/ℏV.

1.2F6F13F20F22givenalgebra

The ring R is a PID: if I≠0 is an ideal, the orders of its nonzero elements have a least value m∈N; choose f∈I of order m. It has the form f=ℏmu with u a unit by [F22], so ℏm∈I, while every g∈I has order at least m and is divisible by ℏm. Thus I=(ℏm); the zero ideal is principal as well, and [F6] says R is a domain, so [F13] applies.

2.1F1F3F17step 1.1algebra

Each generator hi,Dj,ei of the classical Borel has primitive coproduct by [F17], and its image under p is primitive in V0: this follows for Cartan symbols from [F1] and for [vi] by reducing its displayed coproduct modulo ℏ. Hence p commutes with coproduct and counit on generators, and therefore on the generated algebra. Thus p is a surjective Hopf map; since Ub+ is cocommutative by [F17], so is V0. This argument establishes Hopf compatibility only after reduction and makes no Hopf claim about pℏ.

3.1F4F9F15F16step 2.1algebra

Put J=ker⁡p and j=J∩b+. As the kernel of a Hopf map, J is a two-sided ideal and has zero counit. For x∈J, (p⊗p)Δ(x)=0; right exactness of tensor products and surjectivity of p give ker⁡(p⊗p)=J⊗Ub++Ub+⊗J, so J is a coideal. Under the stated AC hypothesis, apply [F4] to obtain J=Ub+j=jUb+ with j a Lie ideal. The universal property [F15] identifies the quotient Ub+/J with Ua, where a=b+/j, and p with the quotient map. AC is used here only through [F4]; all other choices below are finite-dimensional or explicitly specified.

3.2F1F5F23F6step 1.2step 2.1algebra

The first-order skew part δ(xˉ)=((Δ(x)−Δop(x))/ℏ) mod ℏ of the formal Borel coproduct is well-defined on V0: its numerator reduces to zero by step 2.1, and changing a lift by ℏy changes the quotient by Δ(y)−Δop(y), which is zero modulo ℏ because V0 is cocommutative. The quotient is unique because R is a domain and the coefficientwise word–Cartan module is ℏ-torsion-free. To see this, each ⟨V⟩[γ] is a submodule of a finite free word module and hence finite free by [F23] and step 1.2; tensoring each such component with the coefficientwise torsion-free AC in [F1] preserves ℏ-torsion-freeness, as do its coefficientwise completed tensor powers. Put D=Δ−Δop and let c cyclically permute three tensor factors. Coassociativity gives (1+c+c2)(D⊗id⁡)D=0: expanding D gives four permutations of (Δ⊗id⁡)Δ=(id⁡⊗Δ)Δ, whose cyclic sums cancel in pairs. Since D is divisible by ℏ, division by ℏ2 and reduction prove co-Jacobi for δ, and flip gives antisymmetry. For primitive a,b∈V0, subtracting the two algebra-map commutator identities for Δ and Δop, dividing by ℏ, and reducing gives δ([a,b])=[a⊗1+1⊗a,δ(b)]−[b⊗1+1⊗b,δ(a)], the required 1-cocycle rule. Directly from [F1], δ(hˉi)=δ(Dˉj)=0 and δ([vi]‾)=di[vi]‾∧hˉi. These values lie in ⋀2a; since a is generated by their images and the cobracket is a 1-cocycle, δ restricts to a Lie-bialgebra cobracket on a. The transposed bracket in [F5] gives the same formulas on b+: its Cartan cobracket is zero and its explicit rescaled-Manin normalization gives δb+(ei)=diei∧hi. Thus p∣b+:b+→a is a Lie-bialgebra map, because both cobrackets obey the 1-cocycle rule and agree on the Cartan and simple generators.

4.1F1F3F5step 3.2algebra

The graded dual p∗:agr′↪(b+)gr′≅b− is injective and is a Lie-algebra map by step 3.2 and [F5]; every root component is finite-dimensional. Its image contains the full Cartan subalgebra because p maps the classical Cartan basis to the independent polynomial Cartan variables, and it contains each fi because p(ei)=[vi]‾≠0 in the one-dimensional simple-root component. Since b− is generated by its Cartan and the fi by the separate Serre presentation [F3], the image is all of b−. Dualizing each finite-dimensional root component shows p∣b+ is an isomorphism, so j=0 and p:Ub+→V0 is an isomorphism.

5.1F1F3step 4.1algebra

The map p preserves the NI grading and sends ei to [vi]‾. The module decomposition in [F1] identifies the image of ⟨V⟩ in V0 with ⟨V⟩/ℏ⟨V⟩. Restricting the isomorphism of step 4.1 to the positive subalgebra proves Uℏn+/ℏUℏn+≅Un+ and identifies that classical half with ⟨V⟩/ℏ⟨V⟩.

6.1F3F7F14F18F23step 1.2step 5.1algebra

Fix α∈Q+. Since I is finite by [F18], the word space Sh(V)[α] has finitely many words and is finite free over R, so Nα:=⟨V⟩[α] is finite-rank free by [F23]. The presented component Mα:=Uℏn+[α] is finitely generated, since it is a quotient of the finite free span of words of degree α. By [F7] and [F14] over the PID of step 1.2, write Mα≅Rp⊕T, with T≅⨁j=1tR/(ℏmj) for positive integers mj: every nonzero nonunit of R is a unit times a power of ℏ. Since Mα/ℏMα≅Un+[α] by step 5.1, if d=dim⁡CUn+[α], then d=p+t.

7.1F7F10F22step 5.1step 6.1algebra

The surjection pℏ restricts to Mα↠Nα, and Nα has rank d because its reduction is the classical component in step 5.1. The target is torsion-free, so this map kills T; reducing the induced surjection Rp↠Nα modulo ℏ gives p≥d. Together with d=p+t, this forces t=0 and p=d. At α=0, both components are R⋅1 and the map sends unit to unit. If d=0, the decomposition gives Mα=Nα=0. For d>0, choose bases: the surjection is a square matrix whose determinant reduces to a nonzero determinant over C, hence is a unit by [F22]; [F10] makes it invertible. Therefore Mα→Nα is an isomorphism for every α, proving (i) and the first equality in (iii).

8.1F6F11F12F16F19F20F21F24step 1.2step 7.1algebra∎

Put K=Frac⁡(R). Evaluation q′↦eℏ embeds C[q′] into R: for a nonzero polynomial, factor out its maximal power of (q′−1); the remaining factor has nonzero value at 1, while eℏ−1≠0, so its evaluation is nonzero in the domain R. By [F19] and [F21], this substitution sends qi′=q′di to ediℏ; [F12] extends the injection to C(q′)↪K. For fixed α, the relations in that degree are the columns of a finite matrix over C[q′±1]; finiteness follows because there are finitely many words of degree α, and [F24] makes every Gaussian entry Laurent polynomial. Substituting q′=eℏ gives the formal presentation matrix for Mα. By [F16], its quotient after extension to K is the quotient by the same specialized columns. A field embedding preserves which matrix minors vanish, so the generic and formal matrices have the same rank; [F11] and step 7.1 give dim⁡C(q′)Uq′n+[α]=dim⁡K(Mα⊗RK)=d. This proves the remaining equality in (iii) and completes all assertions. The theorem is not an iff statement, so there are no reverse implications to prove.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

113 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources