Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brownian step-potential resolvent at zero

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let α,β>0, let V(x):=α+β1{x>0} for xR, let B be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion and let B^ be its all-path continuous jointly measurable version. Define, for xR, u(x):=0E[exp(0tV(x+B^r)dr)]dt. Then 0u1/α, the function u is Borel, C1 on R and C2 off 0, and 12u(x)=αu(x)1(x<0),12u(x)=(α+β)u(x)1(x>0), while u(0)=1α(α+β).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, ACω, DC, reals α,β>0, the potential V=α+β1{x>0}, a standard Brownian motion B and its jointly measurable continuous version B^.

[F1]

Every path of B^ is continuous and (t,ω)B^t(ω) is product measurable; hence (x,t,ω)V(x+B^t(ω)) is product measurable and the version agrees with B at all times on one measurable full event. We use only this full-event conclusion, not measurability of the entire equality set. Brownian motion has a jointly measurable continuous version

[F2]

Markov property: E[Φ((Bs+r)r0)Fs]=ΨΦ(Bs) almost surely for bounded Borel Φ, with ΨΦ(y)=Φ(y+w)μ(dw); and for f bounded Borel, Psf(x)=E[f(x+Bs)]=f(y)ps(x,y)dy with ps the Brownian transition density. Future-path Markov property The Brownian transition semigroup The Brownian kernels form a semigroup The future-path theorem also supplies its continuous-path Borel formulation; below it is applied to the Brownian process B^ with its own natural filtration.

[F3]

FTC package: the indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous and has the integrand as its derivative almost everywhere; for absolutely continuous F one has F(x)F(a)=axF(t)dt for all x. This interface carries ACω and DC. The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain

[F4]

Tonelli applies to nonnegative product-measurable integrands, giving measurability of the section integrals and equality of the iterated integrals; φ(x)=(2π)1/2ex2/2 has total mass one and Rev2dv=π. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one The Gaussian integral ex2dx=π

[F5]

The Lebesgue change-of-variables formula holds for a C1 diffeomorphism and an integrable function, using the absolute Jacobian, under Countable Choice. Monotone convergence passes nonnegative exhaustion limits, and dominated convergence applies under an integrable majorant. A differentiable function with zero derivative on an interval is constant. A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions Monotone convergence for the integral Dominated convergence A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant

[F6]

Taking out what is known: an Fs-measurable bounded factor may be moved inside a conditional expectation. Taking out what is known

[F7]

AC is the ambient assumption of the Brownian, Markov and conditional expectation interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write X for the supplied all-path continuous version. For parameters (x,t,omega,r), the nonnegative function 1{0rt}V(x+Xr(ω)) is product measurable by [F1]. Its section integral in r is measurable by [F4]; for a measurability-only application one may equip the remaining parameter space with the zero measure, which is finite, so no parameter measurability is lost. Thus the exponential and its successive integrals in omega and t are measurable, and u is Borel. Since αt0tV(x+Xr)dr(α+β)t, one has 0u0eαtdt=1/α. The last integral follows from [F3] on finite intervals and then [F5] by monotone convergence. X is itself Brownian, since all its finite-dimensional laws agree with B.

F1F3F4F5given
1.2

Put I(a,b)=0eas2b/s2ds for a>0,b>=0. For b=0, scaling the Gaussian integral gives I(a,0)=π/(2a). For b>0 put c=b/a and g(s)=eas2b/s2. This is integrable, bounded by eas2. Reciprocal substitution s=c/v gives I(a,b)=0(c/s2)g(s)ds. The increasing diffeomorphism v=asb/s maps (0,infinity) onto the real line, with derivative a(1+c/s2). As v2=as2+b/s22ab, [F4] and [F5] yield π=2ae2abI(a,b). All substitutions can first be applied on compact subintervals to integrable continuous functions, then exhausted by monotone convergence; the absolute Jacobian handles the reciprocal map. Now set t=s^2 in the Gaussian time integral, likewise by positive exhaustion. For λ=2α this gives 0eαtpt(z)dt=2/πI(α,z2/2)=λ1eλz, including z=0 by the separate b=0 case.

F4F5
2.1

For bounded Borel f define Gαf(x)=0eαtPtf(x)dt. For nonnegative f, Tonelli and step 1.2 give Gαf(x)=λ1Reλxyf(y)dy. The kernel has integral 2/λ2=1/α, as computed by integrating its exponential on each half-line using [F3] and exhaustion. For signed bounded f apply Tonelli separately to its positive and negative parts; both integrals are bounded by f/α, so subtraction is legitimate and gives the same formula.

F2F3F4F5step 1.2
2.2

Fix x and t>0. On each outcome, A(s)=0s1{x+Xr>0}dr is absolutely continuous with derivative 1{x+Xs>0} almost everywhere by [F3]. Set W(s)=eαsexp(stV(x+Xr)dr). The inner exponent is absolutely continuous and bounded on [0,t]. Composition with the exponential is absolutely continuous because the exponential is Lipschitz on its bounded range; the ordinary chain rule applies at every point where the inner derivative exists. Hence W(s)=β1{x+Xs>0}W(s) almost everywhere. The AC fundamental theorem gives eαtexp(0tV(x+Xr)dr)=β0teαs1{x+Xs>0}exp(stV(x+Xr)dr)ds. No derivative at every point of an open-set boundary is asserted.

F1F3step 1.1
3.1

Let f be bounded Borel and K(z)=eλz/λ. For fixed x and |h|<=1, the difference quotient K(x+hy)K(xy)/h is at most eλeλxy, by the one-sided derivatives of K and integration along the segment. It converges for every y unequal to x to sgn(xy)eλxy. Dominated convergence, with majorant feλeλxy, therefore differentiates the kernel formula. Put L(x)=y<xeλ(xy)f(y)dy and R(x)=y>xeλ(yx)f(y)dy. Then Gαf=(L+R)/λ and (Gαf)=L+R. These L,R are continuous: on a compact range of x write them as exponential factors times indefinite integrals of locally bounded functions, with fixed finite tails. At any continuity point of f, the difference quotient of its weighted indefinite integral tends to the integrand value, since the average error is bounded by the supremum error near that point. Thus L=λL+f(x) and R=λRf(x) there. It follows that (Gαf)=λ(L+R)2f=2αGαf2f at each such point. The first derivative is continuous everywhere.

F3F5step 2.1
3.2

For tau>=0, the function ϕx,τ(w)=exp(0τV(x+w(r))dr) is Borel on continuous-path space: evaluation is jointly measurable as in [F1], and the section-integral argument of step 1.1 applies. Apply the continuous-path formulation in [F2] to X and this bounded functional. At time zero, X_0=0 makes its expectation the Wiener integral. At general s this gives E[exp(ss+τV(x+Xr)dr)FsX]=hτ(x+Xs),hτ(y)=Eϕy,τ(X). The indicator 1{x+Xs>0} is measurable for this filtration. Multiplying by it using [F6] and taking expectations yields an equality for each s,tau; the expectation property here is the defining conditional-expectation event identity with the whole event. Tonelli integrates these nonnegative quantities in s and tau, so no simultaneous choice of conditional-expectation versions over uncountably many times is required. Integrate step 2.2 in t and expectation, then translate t=s+tau using [F5]. Since 0hτ(y)dτ=u(y), the result is u(x)=1αβ0eαsE[1{x+Xs>0}u(x+Xs)]ds.

F1F2F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.2
4.1

Set f(y)=1{y>0}u(y), bounded Borel by step 1.1. The semigroup formula and Gα1=1/α in step 2.1 turn step 3.2 into u=Gα1βGαf. Therefore step 3.1 already proves u is continuously differentiable on the whole real line. In particular f is continuous on each open half-line.

F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2
5.1

At every x unequal to zero, apply step 3.1 to 1 and to f from step 4.1. The coefficient beta must multiply both terms of its second derivative: 12u=αGα11β(αGαff)=αu1+β1{x>0}u. This is continuous separately on the half-lines, so u is C2 there and satisfies the stated two equations. At zero only the already established C1 regularity is used.

step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

To solve the ODE without an unproved general-solution assertion, on an interval where v=k2v, k>0, set F=vkv. Then (ekxF)=0, so [F5] makes F a constant times ekx. Differentiating ekxv and then subtracting the explicit primitive of that exponential gives, again by [F5], v=Aekx+Dekx. Apply this with v=u1/α, k=lambda, on the negative half-line and with v=u1/(α+β), k=μ=2(α+β), on the positive half-line. Boundedness in step 1.1 excludes the exponentially growing term at the respective infinite endpoint. Hence u(x)=1/α+Aeλx (x<0),u(x)=1/(α+β)+Deμx (x>0).

F5step 1.1step 5.1
7.1

Continuity of u and of u at 0, from [step 5.1], gives 1/α+A=1/(α+β)+D and λA=μD; substituting the second into the first yields u(0)=1/α+A with α(u(0)1/α)=α+β(u(0)1/(α+β)), whose solution is u(0)=1/α(α+β).

step 6.1
8.1

The boundary and degeneracy cases are covered: α,β>0 keep V bounded between α and α+β, so 0u1/α and all the integrals converge absolutely; the potential has its single discontinuity at x=0, so the second-order equation is asserted only off 0, where 1{y>0}u is continuous; the case x=0 is handled by the continuity of u and u rather than by the differential equation; the time integral starts at t=0 where the exponent vanishes; and the choice principles used are exactly those declared: ACω and DC enter through the FTC package of [F3], and AC is the ambient assumption of [F7].

step 2.2step 5.1step 7.1F3F7given

Source notes

Yoshida, Lemmas 6.8.1-6.8.3, computes the step-potential resolvent at the origin by an ODE matching argument after identifying the resolvent kernel of the Gaussian semigroup. The proof above separates the two analytical inputs: the Gaussian resolvent kernel λ1eλxy from the time integral of the heat kernel, and the Duhamel identity for the potential V=α+β1{x>0}, which is proved pathwise from the fundamental theorem for absolutely continuous functions. The conditional expectation step uses the future-path Markov property of the page and takes the bounded Fs-measurable factor out.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources