How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Let have characteristic zero (Field) and let be a closed immersion of smooth -schemes of finite type (Closed immersions of schemes) and let be a coherent ideal sheaf that is not identically zero on any irreducible component of , with the inverse-image ideal of under the quotient map . For the marked ideals on and on the canonical resolutions are related, at points , by with repeated times, where is the local codimension of the smooth immersion at , and resolving is locally equivalent to resolving (Canonical resolutions with invariants of a marked ideal).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A characteristic-zero field , a closed embedding of smooth finite-type -schemes, and a marked ideal on generically nonzero on every component. Let be the inverse image of under ; locally the ideal of is generated by regular parameters .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed for the canonical-resolution consumer clauses and their cited AC-dependent construction suppliers.
Closed immersions of schemes, Marked ideals and their support: the quotient map to defines as the ideal of the same closed subscheme of viewed inside . Locally it is generated by the equations of and lifts of generators of . It is coherent because the affine smooth coordinate rings are Noetherian, its restriction to is , and its support for mark is the image of .
Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors, Giraud's tangent-direction lemma, The supports of a multiple test blow-up stay inside the strict transforms of a hypersurface of maximal contact: the sections are tangent directions of at points of , and along the canonical resolution the supports are contained in the strict transforms of the hypersurfaces .
Canonical resolution of marked ideals: the canonical resolution of a marked ideal is built by the algorithm of Steps 1–2, whose reductions depend only on intrinsic data (supports, orders, derivative ideals and the invariants).
Proof
The invariant of the embedded ideal. Running Steps 2a and 1bb of the algorithm for at a point : in Step 2a the ideal is of maximal order with , so the companion ideal is itself and the invariant receives the first coordinate ; in Step 1bb (non-boundary case ) the resolution passes to a hypersurface of maximal contact. Passing successively to the tangent directions , each passage adjoins the source pair , encoded as the four rational coordinates under [F3], to the invariant by [F2], and after passages one arrives at the restriction to , where the invariant of appears. Hence with repeated times, and analogously and .
The resolutions correspond. By [F3] the centers of the resolution of are the maximal loci of the invariants computed in step 1.1; because the first encoded coordinates of are constant on the image of the resolution of , the maximal locus over is the image of the maximal locus of , and blowing it up in restricts to blowing it up in . Iterating, the canonical resolution of restricts over to the canonical resolution of , with the invariant comparison of step 1.1 (the prefixed constant pairs are removed on restriction).
Depends on
- Field
- The Axiom of Choice
- Canonical resolutions with invariants of a marked ideal
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Equivalence of marked ideals
- Marked ideals and their support
- Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Codimension-one components of a maximal-order support
- Giraud's tangent-direction lemma
- The supports of a multiple test blow-up stay inside the strict transforms of a hypersurface of maximal contact
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals
Used by
- Canonical resolutions over non-algebraically-closed ground fields Lemma
- Independence of the embedded desingularization from the ambient embedding Lemma
- Canonical principalization of ideals in characteristic zero Theorem
- Resolution of singularities in characteristic zero Theorem
- Weak embedded desingularization in characteristic zero Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.