How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Giraud's tangent-direction lemma
Statement
Let be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth -scheme , let be a regular center with SNC with , and let be a tangent direction of multiplicity one on an open (Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors). Let be the blowup of with exceptional divisor , and on an open where has local equation put . Then: (1) , i.e. is a tangent direction of the controlled transform; (2) is of multiplicity one on ; (3) is the strict transform of restricted to (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth -scheme , a regular center with SNC with , a tangent direction of multiplicity one on an open , the blowup with exceptional divisor , and an open on which has local equation , with .
Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors, Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: , and the all-characteristic inclusion implies every section of vanishes on the support; a tangent direction of multiplicity one is a section with for every .
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: a controlled transform is computed by ; the exceptional divisor has invertible ideal generated by .
Order of an ideal sheaf at a point: multiplicity one at means , i.e. ; in a regular local ring this means that may be taken as the first member of a regular system of parameters.
Strict transform of a closed subscheme, Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf: the strict transform of is cut out on by the saturation ; since (it vanishes on ) and considerations show divides exactly once in suitable charts, .
Proof
is a tangent direction of the controlled transform. By [F3] the section is the controlled transform of the section of the marked ideal ; since the generator lies in and the controlled transform of a generated ideal is generated by the controlled transforms of generators, . By [F2] with and the hypothesis , this ideal is contained in ; hence is a tangent direction of the controlled transform, which is (1).
Multiplicity one. Away from , the map is an isomorphism and is a unit, so a zero of has the same order as the corresponding zero of , namely one. At a zero of on , its image lies in . By [F1], , and the class of in is nonzero by [F4]; hence can be chosen as one of the regular parameters generating . Since , the point is on a blowup chart whose exceptional parameter is a different normal parameter. There is a chart coordinate, so [F4] gives order one. Thus has multiplicity one on , which is assertion (2).
The zero locus is the strict transform. By [F5] the strict transform of on is cut out by ; hence is the strict transform of restricted to , which is assertion (3).
Depends on
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Order of an ideal sheaf at a point
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
- Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform
- Controlled transforms preserve maximal order on nonempty transformed schemes
Used by
- The maximal-contact mechanism fails in positive characteristic Counterexample
- Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes Lemma
- The supports of a multiple test blow-up stay inside the strict transforms of a hypersurface of maximal contact Lemma
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005) 779-822; author's arXiv version math/0401401 (28 pp., dated October 25, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herwig Hauser, The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities (or: A proof we always wanted to understand), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 323-403 (standard reference, not scraped)