Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Giraud's tangent-direction lemma

Statement

Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth K-scheme X, let C⊊supp⁡(I,E,μ) be a regular center with SNC with E, and let u∈T(I)(U)=Dμ−1(I)(U) be a tangent direction of multiplicity one on an open U⊆X (Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors). Let σ ⁣:X′→X be the blowup of C with exceptional divisor D, and on an open U′⊆σ−1(U) where D has local equation y put u′:=y−1σ∗(u). Then: (1) u′∈Dμ−1(σc(I∣U,μ)∣U′), i.e. u′ is a tangent direction of the controlled transform; (2) u′ is of multiplicity one on U′; (3) V(u′) is the strict transform of V(u) restricted to U′ (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A marked ideal (I,E,μ) of maximal order on the smooth K-scheme X, a regular center C⊊supp⁡(I,E,μ) with SNC with E, a tangent direction u∈T(I)(U)=Dμ−1(I)(U) of multiplicity one on an open U⊆X, the blowup σ ⁣:X′→X with exceptional divisor D, and an open U′⊆σ−1(U) on which D has local equation y, with u′=y−1σ∗(u).

[F1]

Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors, Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: T(I)=Dμ−1(I), and the all-characteristic inclusion supp⁡(I,μ)⊆supp⁡(Dμ−1(I),1) implies every section of T(I) vanishes on the support; a tangent direction of multiplicity one is a section u∈T(I)(U) with ord⁡x(u)=1 for every x∈V(u).

[F2]

Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform: for 0≤r≤μ, σc(Dr(I),μ−r)⊆Dr(σc(I,μ)).

[F3]

Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: a controlled transform is computed by f↦y−(exponent)σ∗(f); the exceptional divisor D has invertible ideal generated by y.

[F4]

Order of an ideal sheaf at a point: multiplicity one at x means ord⁡x(u)=1, i.e. u∈mx∖mx2; in a regular local ring this means that u may be taken as the first member of a regular system of parameters.

[F5]

Strict transform of a closed subscheme, Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf: the strict transform of V(u) is cut out on U′ by the saturation (σ∗(u):y∞); since u∈IC (it vanishes on C⊆V(u)) and ord⁡ considerations show y divides σ∗(u) exactly once in suitable charts, (σ∗(u):y∞)=(σ∗(u)/y)=(u′).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

u′ is a tangent direction of the controlled transform. By [F3] the section u′=y−1σ∗(u) is the controlled transform of the section u of the marked ideal (Dμ−1(I),1); since the generator u lies in Dμ−1(I)(U) and the controlled transform of a generated ideal is generated by the controlled transforms of generators, u′∈σc(Dμ−1(I),1)(U′). By [F2] with r=μ−1 and the hypothesis C⊆supp⁡(I,μ), this ideal is contained in Dμ−1(σc(I,μ))(U′); hence u′ is a tangent direction of the controlled transform, which is (1).

1.2F1F4F5

Multiplicity one. Away from D, the map is an isomorphism and y is a unit, so a zero of u′ has the same order as the corresponding zero of u, namely one. At a zero of u′ on D, its image x lies in C. By [F1], C⊆V(u), and the class of u in mx/mx2 is nonzero by [F4]; hence u can be chosen as one of the regular parameters generating IC. Since u′=0, the point is on a blowup chart whose exceptional parameter y is a different normal parameter. There u′=u/y is a chart coordinate, so [F4] gives order one. Thus u′ has multiplicity one on U′, which is assertion (2).

2.1F5step 1.2∎

The zero locus is the strict transform. By [F5] the strict transform of V(u) on U′ is cut out by (σ∗(u):y∞)=(u′); hence V(u′) is the strict transform of V(u) restricted to U′, which is assertion (3).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources