How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coefficient ideal is equivalent to the marked ideal
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be a marked ideal of maximal order with (The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order). Then in the sense of Equivalence of marked ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC. Let be a marked ideal of maximal order with and its coefficient ideal .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is used through the marked-sum support and test-sequence assertion [F2].
The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order: is the sum of the marked ideals for in the sense of the addition operation.
Addition and multiplication of marked ideals: the multiple test blow-ups of a sum are exactly the simultaneous multiple test blow-ups of its summands, and the controlled transforms of the sum are the sums of the controlled transforms.
Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up: every multiple test blow-up of is a multiple test blow-up of each , with .
Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: in every characteristic and at every stage , for .
Equivalence of marked ideals: equivalence means equal -data, equal supports and equal multiple test blow-ups with equal induced supports.
Proof
The multiple test blow-ups coincide. By [F2], a multiple test blow-up of the coefficient sum is a simultaneous multiple test blow-up of its summands; since the summand is , every such sequence is a multiple test blow-up of . Conversely, [F3] shows that every multiple test blow-up of is a multiple test blow-up of every derivative summand, hence of their sum. Thus the two families coincide in every characteristic.
Equal supports at every stage. At any stage , [F4] shows that the support of is contained in the support of every derivative summand. Their intersection therefore contains , using the transformed-derivative inclusion in [F3]; the reverse inclusion follows because the summand is exactly . By [F2], this intersection is the support of the coefficient sum's controlled transform. Hence the two supports agree at every stage, and together with step 1.1 and [F5] this proves in every characteristic.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order
- Equivalence of marked ideals
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Addition and multiplication of marked ideals
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
- Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.