Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The coefficient ideal is equivalent to the marked ideal

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).

Let (I,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order with μ≥1 (The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order). Then C(I,μ)≃(I,μ) in the sense of Equivalence of marked ideals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC. Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order with μ≥1 and its coefficient ideal C(I,μ)=∑i=0μ−1(Di(I),μ−i).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is used through the marked-sum support and test-sequence assertion [F2].

[F1]

The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order: C(I,μ) is the sum of the marked ideals (DiI,μ−i) for 0≤i≤μ−1 in the sense of the addition operation.

[F2]

Addition and multiplication of marked ideals: the multiple test blow-ups of a sum are exactly the simultaneous multiple test blow-ups of its summands, and the controlled transforms of the sum are the sums of the controlled transforms.

[F3]

Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up: every multiple test blow-up of (I,μ) is a multiple test blow-up of each Di(I,μ), with [Di(I,μ)]k⊆Di(Ik,μ).

[F4]

Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: in every characteristic and at every stage k, supp⁡(Ik,μ)⊆supp⁡(Di(Ik),μ−i) for 0≤i<μ.

[F5]

Equivalence of marked ideals: equivalence means equal E-data, equal supports and equal multiple test blow-ups with equal induced supports.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3

The multiple test blow-ups coincide. By [F2], a multiple test blow-up of the coefficient sum is a simultaneous multiple test blow-up of its summands; since the i=0 summand is (I,μ), every such sequence is a multiple test blow-up of (I,μ). Conversely, [F3] shows that every multiple test blow-up of (I,μ) is a multiple test blow-up of every derivative summand, hence of their sum. Thus the two families coincide in every characteristic.

2.1A1F2F3F4F5step 1.1∎

Equal supports at every stage. At any stage k, [F4] shows that the support of (Ik,μ) is contained in the support of every derivative summand. Their intersection therefore contains supp⁡(Ik,μ), using the transformed-derivative inclusion in [F3]; the reverse inclusion follows because the i=0 summand is exactly (Ik,μ). By [F2], this intersection is the support of the coefficient sum's controlled transform. Hence the two supports agree at every stage, and together with step 1.1 and [F5] this proves C(I,μ)≃(I,μ) in every characteristic.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources