How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up
Statement
Let be a marked ideal on a smooth -scheme and let be a multiple test blow-up with controlled transforms (Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals). Then is also a multiple test blow-up of the marked ideal for every , and for all Indeed the centers of lie in the derivative supports by the all-characteristic forward inclusion in Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range, and the transform inclusion follows by induction on using Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A marked ideal on a smooth -scheme and a multiple test blow-up with controlled transforms , and .
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals: each step blows up a regular center in SNC position with , or is an isomorphism; the controlled transform is .
Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: in every characteristic, for ; for the target marking is zero and its support is all of .
Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform: for the single blow-up with center in the support, , and is monotone on inclusions.
Controlled transforms are well defined, Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: the controlled transform and the derivative ideal are well-defined ideal sheaves, so inclusions can be checked locally.
Proof
The centers are admissible for the derivative ideal. Let and let denote the -th controlled transform of the marked ideal along the same sequence. We prove by induction on that the sequence is a multiple test blow-up of and that . For this is equality. Assume it for . By [F2] applied at stage , , and the latter is contained in by the induction inclusion (a smaller ideal has a larger order-superlevel support), so is an admissible center for the derivative marked ideal and step is defined for it.
The transform inclusion. With the notation of step 1.1, , using the induction inclusion and the monotonicity of the controlled transform in step 1, and [F3] in step 2. This completes the induction and proves both assertions.
Depends on
- Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Controlled transforms are well defined
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
- Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.