How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Controlled transforms are well defined
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the regular-local and blowup suppliers. Let be a marked ideal on a smooth -scheme , let be a regular closed subscheme with SNC with , let be the blowup of with exceptional divisor (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup), and let be the ideal sheaf of and the invertible ideal of (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). Then Consequently the controlled transform is an ideal sheaf on (Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals), and for the local section , a local equation of , is well defined up to a unit and generates the controlled transform wherever generates .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A marked ideal on a smooth -scheme , a regular closed subscheme with SNC with , the blowup of with exceptional divisor , the ideal of and the invertible ideal of .
Marked ideals and their support: the support is , and means for every .
Order of an ideal sheaf at a point: ; equivalently, is the minimum of over local sections of at .
The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor: is the invertible ideal of the exceptional divisor, generated locally by the equation of .
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals: the controlled transform of along is ; for a local section the section is called a controlled transform of .
regular local regular quotient ideal is parameter generated, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: at a point the ideal is generated by parameters that extend to a regular system of parameters of ; in particular is reduced at , and a section not in has a nonvanishing value at some point of .
The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier, Effective cartier divisor: the exceptional divisor is an effective Cartier divisor with invertible ideal and local equation a nonzerodivisor.
Associated graded algebra of an ideal generated by a regular sequence (Stacks, Lemma 10.69.2): if is generated by a regular sequence in , then . In particular each is a finite free -module. The proof eliminates a homogeneous relation by induction on the sequence length and its degree, using nonzerodivisibility of the last generator modulo the preceding ones.
Proof
Fix , put and . By [F5], is generated by an initial parameter sequence and is a regular local domain. If were outside , choose the largest with . Its nonzero class in remains nonzero after localization at , since [F7] makes this module free over the domain . But at the generic point of the component of through , and its maximal ideal is . Thus has order at , contradicting . This proves ; outside the inclusion is automatic. If it is immediate everywhere.
Second inclusion. Pulling back the inclusion of step 1.1 along and using that inverse image commutes with ideal products, , the last equality by [F3].
The controlled transform is defined and well posed. By step 2.1 the product is an ideal sheaf on , namely the controlled transform of [F4]. If is a local equation of and are local generators of on an open set, then for a unit , so differs by the unit ; and replacing by the equation of another local generator changes by , again a unit. Hence is well defined up to a unit and generates the controlled transform wherever generates , as asserted.
Remarks
- The two inclusions admit the empty center reading: if then and both inclusions are trivial; the controlled transform is then with an isomorphism, matching the definition of a multiple test blow-up extended by isomorphisms.
- No choice beyond the published blowup interface is used in this item.
Depends on
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Effective cartier divisor
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- Ideal sheaves
- Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
- Marked ideals and their support
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Order of an ideal sheaf at a point
- Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position
- The Axiom of Choice
- regular local regular quotient ideal is parameter generated
- regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
- The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier
- Associated graded algebra of an ideal generated by a regular sequence
Used by
- Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform Lemma
- Controlled transforms preserve maximal order on nonempty transformed schemes Lemma
- Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up Lemma
- Etale commutativity of the maximal-order resolution step Lemma
- Glueing of homogenized ideals along etale neighbourhoods Lemma
- Smooth base change of multiple test blow-ups Lemma
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005) 779-822; author's arXiv version math/0401401 (28 pp., dated October 25, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.69.2 and equation (10.69.0.1): regular sequences are quasi-regular (standard reference, not scraped)