Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Controlled transforms are well defined

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the regular-local and blowup suppliers. Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal on a smooth K-scheme X, let C⊆supp⁡(I,E,μ) be a regular closed subscheme with SNC with E, let σ ⁣:X′→X be the blowup of C with exceptional divisor D (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup), and let IC⊆OX be the ideal sheaf of C and I(D)⊆OX′ the invertible ideal of D (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). Then I⊆ICμandσ∗I⊆I(D)μ. Consequently the controlled transform σc(I,μ):=(I(D)−μσ∗I,μ) is an ideal sheaf on X′ (Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals), and for f∈I(U) the local section y−μσ∗(f), y a local equation of D, is well defined up to a unit and generates the controlled transform wherever f generates I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A marked ideal (I,E,μ) on a smooth K-scheme X, a regular closed subscheme C⊆supp⁡(I,E,μ) with SNC with E, the blowup σ ⁣:X′→X of C with exceptional divisor D, the ideal IC of C and the invertible ideal I(D) of D.

[F1]

Marked ideals and their support: the support is supp⁡(I,E,μ)={x:ord⁡x(I)≥μ}, and C⊆supp⁡(I,E,μ) means ord⁡x(I)≥μ for every x∈C.

[F2]

Order of an ideal sheaf at a point: ord⁡x(I)=max⁡{n:Ix⊆mx n}; equivalently, ord⁡x(I) is the minimum of ord⁡x(f) over local sections f of I at x.

[F3]

The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor: σ∗IC=I(D) is the invertible ideal of the exceptional divisor, generated locally by the equation y of D.

[F4]

Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals: the controlled transform of (I,μ) along σ is σc(I,μ)=(I(D)−μσ∗I,μ); for a local section f the section y−μσ∗(f) is called a controlled transform of f.

[F5]

regular local regular quotient ideal is parameter generated, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: at a point x∈C the ideal IC is generated by parameters u1,…,uk that extend to a regular system of parameters u1,…,un of OX,x; in particular C is reduced at x, and a section not in IC has a nonvanishing value at some point of C.

[F6]

The pulled-back center ideal is the relative twist; the exceptional divisor is Cartier, Effective cartier divisor: the exceptional divisor D is an effective Cartier divisor with invertible ideal I(D) and local equation y a nonzerodivisor.

[F7]

Associated graded algebra of an ideal generated by a regular sequence (Stacks, Lemma 10.69.2): if P=(u1,…,uc) is generated by a regular sequence in R, then gr⁡PR=(R/P)[U1,…,Uc]. In particular each Pj/Pj+1 is a finite free R/P-module. The proof eliminates a homogeneous relation by induction on the sequence length and its degree, using nonzerodivisibility of the last generator modulo the preceding ones.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5F7

Fix x∈C, put R=OX,x and P=IC,x. By [F5], P is generated by an initial parameter sequence and R/P is a regular local domain. If f∈Ix were outside Pμ, choose the largest j<μ with f∈Pj. Its nonzero class in Pj/Pj+1 remains nonzero after localization at P, since [F7] makes this module free over the domain R/P. But RP=OX,η at the generic point η of the component of C through x, and its maximal ideal is PRP. Thus f has order j<μ at η, contradicting η∈C⊆supp⁡(I,μ). This proves Ix⊆Pμ; outside C the inclusion is automatic. If μ=0 it is immediate everywhere.

2.1F3step 1.1

Second inclusion. Pulling back the inclusion of step 1.1 along σ and using that inverse image commutes with ideal products, σ∗I⊆σ∗(ICμ)=(σ∗IC)μ=I(D)μ, the last equality by [F3].

3.1F3F4F6step 2.1∎

The controlled transform is defined and well posed. By step 2.1 the product I(D)−μσ∗I is an ideal sheaf on X′, namely the controlled transform of [F4]. If y is a local equation of D and f,f′ are local generators of I on an open set, then f′=uf for a unit u, so y−μσ∗(f′)=(σ∗u) y−μσ∗(f) differs by the unit σ∗u; and replacing y by the equation y′=vy of another local generator changes y−μσ∗(f) by v−μ, again a unit. Hence y−μσ∗(f) is well defined up to a unit and generates the controlled transform wherever f generates I, as asserted.

Remarks

  • The two inclusions admit the empty center reading: if C=∅ then IC=OX and both inclusions are trivial; the controlled transform is then σ∗I with σ an isomorphism, matching the definition of a multiple test blow-up extended by isomorphisms.
  • No choice beyond the published blowup interface is used in this item.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources